Population age structure dependency of the excess mortality P-score.
COVID-19
Decomposition
Excess mortality
P-score
Standardization
Journal
Population health metrics
ISSN: 1478-7954
Titre abrégé: Popul Health Metr
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101178411
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Sep 2024
27 Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
30
05
2024
accepted:
18
09
2024
medline:
28
9
2024
pubmed:
28
9
2024
entrez:
28
9
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, the excess mortality P-score has gained prominence as a measure of pandemic burden. The P-score indicates the percentage by which observed deaths deviate from expected deaths. As the P-score is regularly used to compare excess mortality between countries, questions arise regarding the age dependency of the measure. In this paper we present formal and empirical results on the population structure bias of the P-score with a special focus on cross-country comparisons during the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe. P-scores were calculated for European countries for 2021, 2022, and 2023 using data from the 2024 revision of the United Nations' World Population Prospects and the HMDs Short Term Mortality Fluctuations data series. The expected deaths for 2021, 2022, and 2023 were estimated using a Lee-Carter forecast model assuming pre-pandemic conditions. P-score differences between countries were decomposed using a Kitagawa-type decomposition into excess-mortality and structural components. To investigate the sensitivity of P-score cross-country rankings to differences in population structure we calculated the rank-correlation between age-standardized and classical P-scores. The P-score is an average of age-specific percent excess deaths weighted by the age-distribution of expected deaths. It can be shown that the effect of differences in the distribution of deaths only plays a marginal role in a European comparison. In most cases, the excess mortality effect is the dominant effect. P-score rankings among European countries during the COVID-19 pandemic are similar under both age-standardized and classical P-scores. Although the P-score formally depends on the age-distribution of expected deaths, this structural component only plays a minor role in a European comparison, as the distribution of deaths across the continent is similar. Thus, the P-score is suitable as a measure of excess mortality in a European comparison, as it mainly reflects the differences in excess mortality. However, this finding should not be extrapolated to global comparisons, where countries could have very different death distributions. In situations were P-score comparisons are biased age-standardization can be applied as a solution.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, the excess mortality P-score has gained prominence as a measure of pandemic burden. The P-score indicates the percentage by which observed deaths deviate from expected deaths. As the P-score is regularly used to compare excess mortality between countries, questions arise regarding the age dependency of the measure. In this paper we present formal and empirical results on the population structure bias of the P-score with a special focus on cross-country comparisons during the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe.
METHODS
METHODS
P-scores were calculated for European countries for 2021, 2022, and 2023 using data from the 2024 revision of the United Nations' World Population Prospects and the HMDs Short Term Mortality Fluctuations data series. The expected deaths for 2021, 2022, and 2023 were estimated using a Lee-Carter forecast model assuming pre-pandemic conditions. P-score differences between countries were decomposed using a Kitagawa-type decomposition into excess-mortality and structural components. To investigate the sensitivity of P-score cross-country rankings to differences in population structure we calculated the rank-correlation between age-standardized and classical P-scores.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The P-score is an average of age-specific percent excess deaths weighted by the age-distribution of expected deaths. It can be shown that the effect of differences in the distribution of deaths only plays a marginal role in a European comparison. In most cases, the excess mortality effect is the dominant effect. P-score rankings among European countries during the COVID-19 pandemic are similar under both age-standardized and classical P-scores.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Although the P-score formally depends on the age-distribution of expected deaths, this structural component only plays a minor role in a European comparison, as the distribution of deaths across the continent is similar. Thus, the P-score is suitable as a measure of excess mortality in a European comparison, as it mainly reflects the differences in excess mortality. However, this finding should not be extrapolated to global comparisons, where countries could have very different death distributions. In situations were P-score comparisons are biased age-standardization can be applied as a solution.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39334191
doi: 10.1186/s12963-024-00346-w
pii: 10.1186/s12963-024-00346-w
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
25Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Mathieu E et al. Coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19). Our world in data. https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus (2020).
Von Cube M, Timsit J-F, Kammerlander A, Schumacher M. Quantifying and communicating the burden of COVID-19. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021;21(2024):164. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01349-z .
doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01349-z
Schöley J. Robustness and bias of European excess death estimates in 2020 under varying model specifications preprint (Epidemiology, 2021). https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.04.21258353 (2023).
Msemburi W, et al. The WHO estimates of excess mortality associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. Nature. 2023;613(7942):130–7.
doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05522-2
pubmed: 36517599
Wu J, McCann A, Katz J, Peltier E, Singh K D. The pandemic’s hidden toll: half a million deaths. The New York Times. ISSN: 0362-4331. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/04/21/world/coronavirus-missingdeaths.html (2020).
Romei V, Giles C, Burn-Murdoch J. Global coronavirus death toll could be 60% higher than reported—free to read. Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/6bd88b7d-3386-4543-b2e9-0d5c6fac846c (2020).
De Nicola G, Kauermann G. Estimating excess mortality in high-income countries during the COVID-19 pandemic May 30, 2023. arXiv:2305.19139 [stat] (2023).
Davies L. Excess deaths, baselines, Z-scores, P-scores and peaks Oct. 20, 2020. arXiv: 2010.10320 [stat] (2023).
Karlinsky A, Kobak D. Tracking excess mortality across countries during the COVID-19 pandemic with the World Mortality Dataset. eLife. 2021;10:e69336. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69336 .
doi: 10.7554/eLife.69336
pubmed: 34190045
pmcid: 8331176
Brunner JH, Sigurdsson FS, Svennebye L, Täube V. COVID-19: excess mortality in selected European countries—European Free Trade Association. https://www.efta.int/media-resources/news/covid-19-excess-mortalityselected-european-countries (2024).
Aron J, Muellbauer J, Giattino C, Ritchie H. A pandemic primer on excess mortality statistics and their comparability across countries Our world in data. https://ourworldindata.org/covid-excess-mortality .
Colonia SRR, Cardeal LM, Oliveira RAD, Trinca LA. Assessing COVID-19 pandemic excess deaths in Brazil: years 2020 and 2021. PLoS One. 2023;18:e0272752. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272752 .
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272752
pubmed: 37228083
pmcid: 10212149
De Padua Durante AC, et al. Mixed effects modelling of excess mortality and COVID-19 lockdowns in Thailand. Sci Rep. 2024;14:8240.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58358-3
pubmed: 38589527
pmcid: 11001903
Kontis V, et al. Lessons learned and lessons missed: impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on all-cause mortality in 40 industrialised countries and US states prior to mass vaccination. Wellcome Open Res. 2022;6:279.
doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17253.2
pubmed: 35252592
pmcid: 8861471
De Geyter C, Masciocchi M, Gobrecht-Keller U. Excess mortality caused by the COVID-19 pandemic negatively impacts birth numbers in European countries. Human Reprod. 2023;37:822–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deac031 .
doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac031
Oduor C, et al. Estimating excess mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic from a population-based infectious disease surveillance in two diverse populations in Kenya, March 2020–December 2021. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022;3:e0002141.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002141
Aron J, Muellbauer J. Excess mortality versus COVID-19 death rates: a spatial analysis of socioeconomic disparities and political allegiance across US states. Rev Income Wealth. 2022;68:348–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12570 .
doi: 10.1111/roiw.12570
pubmed: 35602915
pmcid: 9115509
Heuveline P. Interpreting changes in life expectancy during temporary mortality shocks. Demogr Res. 2023;48:1–18.
doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2023.48.1
pubmed: 38031551
pmcid: 10686282
Muellbauer J, Aron J. The US excess mortality rate from COVID-19 is substantially worse than Europe’s. https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/us-excessmortality-rate-covid-19-substantially-worse-europes (2024).
Yule GU. On some points relating to vital statistics more especially statistics of occupational mortality. J R Stat Soc. 1934;97(1):1–84. https://doi.org/10.2307/2342014 .
doi: 10.2307/2342014
Delgado-Rodríguez M, Llorca J. Caution should be exercised when using the standardized infection ratio. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2005;26:8–9.
doi: 10.1086/503173
pubmed: 15693402
Rey G, et al. The impact of major heat waves on all-cause and cause-specific mortality in France from 1971 to 2003. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2007;80:615–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-007-0173-4 .
doi: 10.1007/s00420-007-0173-4
pubmed: 17468879
pmcid: 2291483
Kitagawa EM. Components of a difference between two rates. J Am Stat Assoc. 1955;50:1168.
Preston SH, Heuveline P, Guillot M. Demography: measuring and modeling population processes. ISBN: 978-1557864512. Blackwell Publishers, Malden (2001)
Jdanov DA, et al. The short-term mortality fluctuation data series, monitoring mortality shocks across time and space. Sci Data. 2021;8:235.
doi: 10.1038/s41597-021-01019-1
pubmed: 34489477
pmcid: 8421508
Rizzi S, Gampe J, Eilers PHC. Efficient estimation of smooth distributions from coarsely grouped data. Am J Epidemiol. 2015;182:138–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwv020 .
doi: 10.1093/aje/kwv020
pubmed: 26081676
pmcid: 4493979
D Pascariu M, J Dańko M, ., Schöley J, Rizzi S. Ungroup: an R package for efficient estimation of smooth distributions from coarsely binned data. J Open Source Softw. 2018;3:937. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00937 .
doi: 10.21105/joss.00937
Lee RD, Carter LR. Modeling and forecasting US mortality. J Am Stat Assoc. 1992;87:659.
United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World Population Prospects 2024 Online Edition (2024).
Villegas AM, Kaishev VK, Millossovich P. StMoMo: an R package for stochastic mortality modeling. J Stat Softw. 2018;84:1–38. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v084.i03 .
doi: 10.18637/jss.v084.i03
Wang H, et al. Estimating excess mortality due to the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic analysis of COVID-19-related mortality, 2020–21. Lancet. 2022;399:1513–36.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02796-3