Day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the management of gallbladder disease: a literature review.
Complications
Conversion-to-open
Day-case surgery
Gallstones
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Unexpected admission
Journal
Langenbeck's archives of surgery
ISSN: 1435-2451
Titre abrégé: Langenbecks Arch Surg
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9808285
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Sep 2024
28 Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
28
08
2024
accepted:
16
09
2024
medline:
29
9
2024
pubmed:
28
9
2024
entrez:
28
9
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DCLC) has gained traction globally due to its benefits, including shorter hospital stays, reduced costs, and enhanced patient experience. While concerns about patient safety, particularly related to bleeding and bile duct injury persist, the literature supports the efficacy and advantages of DCLC highlighting the need for its wider adoption in healthcare settings to optimise resources and improve patient outcomes. This was a literature review that aims to assess the feasibility and safety of day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallstone patients, focusing on incidence and aetiology of unexpected admissions and readmissions, as well as conversion-to-open rates. PubMed was searched for all studies focusing on DCLC between 2014 and 2024. The timeframe was specifically selected to identify recent trends and practices in this evolving field. By focusing on this specific period, the review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of current practices, emerging trends, and the evolving standard of care in this area. This review highlights that the main causes of unexpected admission post DCLC were postoperative nausea, vomiting, and pain, while the implementation of anaesthetic pathways notably increased day-case rates. Studies addressing complication rates postoperatively consistently found no significant difference between day-case and in-patient procedures. DCLC for symptomatic gallstone patients is supported by research as safe and effective, with high success rates and patient satisfaction. Studies show minimal complications and acceptable readmission rates, suggesting that DCLC can be the standard approach for selective patients, improving outcomes and healthcare efficiency.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DCLC) has gained traction globally due to its benefits, including shorter hospital stays, reduced costs, and enhanced patient experience. While concerns about patient safety, particularly related to bleeding and bile duct injury persist, the literature supports the efficacy and advantages of DCLC highlighting the need for its wider adoption in healthcare settings to optimise resources and improve patient outcomes.
METHODS
METHODS
This was a literature review that aims to assess the feasibility and safety of day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallstone patients, focusing on incidence and aetiology of unexpected admissions and readmissions, as well as conversion-to-open rates. PubMed was searched for all studies focusing on DCLC between 2014 and 2024. The timeframe was specifically selected to identify recent trends and practices in this evolving field. By focusing on this specific period, the review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of current practices, emerging trends, and the evolving standard of care in this area.
RESULTS
RESULTS
This review highlights that the main causes of unexpected admission post DCLC were postoperative nausea, vomiting, and pain, while the implementation of anaesthetic pathways notably increased day-case rates. Studies addressing complication rates postoperatively consistently found no significant difference between day-case and in-patient procedures.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
DCLC for symptomatic gallstone patients is supported by research as safe and effective, with high success rates and patient satisfaction. Studies show minimal complications and acceptable readmission rates, suggesting that DCLC can be the standard approach for selective patients, improving outcomes and healthcare efficiency.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39340655
doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03479-6
pii: 10.1007/s00423-024-03479-6
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
292Informations de copyright
© 2024. Crown.
Références
McIntyre C, Johnston A, Foley D, Lawler J, Bucholc M, Flanagan L et al Readmission to hospital following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2024 Aug 14];52(1):47–55. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32090306/
El-Sharkawy AM, Tewari N, Vohra RS, Vohra RS, Pasquali S, Kirkham AJ et al The Cholecystectomy As A Day Case (CAAD) Score: A Validated Score of Preoperative Predictors of Successful Day-Case Cholecystectomy Using the CholeS Data Set. World J Surg [Internet]. 2019 Aug 15 [cited 2024 Aug 14];43(8):1928–34. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31016355/
Ayyaz F, Joyner J, Cheetham M, Briggs T, Gray W Association of day-case rates with post COVID-19 recovery of elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy activity across England. Ann R Coll Surg Engl [Internet]. 2024 Apr 2 [cited 2024 Aug 14]; https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38563060/
Keeratibharat N, Patcharanarumol S, Puranapanya S, Phupaibul S, Khomweerawong N, Chansangrat J (2024) Comparative study of ambulatory versus inpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Thailand: Assessing effectiveness and safety with a propensity score matched analysis. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg [Internet]. May 20 [cited 2024 Aug 14]; https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38764363/
Aslet MED, Yates DRA, Wasawo S Improving the day case rate for laparoscopic cholecystectomy via introduction of a dedicated clinical pathway. J Perioper Pract [Internet]. 2020 Jun 1 [cited 2024 Aug 14];30(6):156–62. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31524067/
Kang SH, Park MH Comparison of early postoperative recovery between laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized trial. Medicine [Internet]. 2019 Jun 1 [cited 2024 Aug 14];98(25):e16022. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31232934/
Carron M, Zarantonello F, Lazzarotto N, Tellaroli P, Ori C Role of sugammadex in accelerating postoperative discharge: A meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth [Internet]. 2017 Jun 1 [cited 2024 Aug 14];39:38–44. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28494905/
Macedo-Alves D, Monteiro JM, Freire L, Guerreiro E. Differences between Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy with Discharge at the End of the Day Versus Overnight Stay: A Retrospective Study. Acta Med Port [Internet]. 2020 Sep. 1 [cited 2024 Sep. 19];33(9):552–558. https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/12420
Cao J, Liu B, Shi J, Meng X, Zhang H, Pan Y et al (2021) Safety of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the elderly. ANZ J Surg [Internet]. Apr 1 [cited 2024 Aug 14];91(4):597–602. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33605041/
Gurusamy K, Samraj K, Gluud C, Wilson E, Davidson BR Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the safety and effectiveness of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg [Internet]. 2010 Feb [cited 2024 Aug 14];97(2):141–150. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20035546/
Beck AC, Goffredo P, Gao X, McGonagill PW, Weigel RJ, Hassan I. Unanticipated Admission Following Outpatient Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Identifying Opportunities for Improvement. The American SurgeonTM. 2021;87(7):1080–1086. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33316162/
Bowling K, Leong S, El-Badawy S, Massri E, Rait J, Atkinson J et al (2017) A Single Centre Experience of Day Case Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Outcomes by Body Mass Index Group. Surg Res Pract [Internet]. [cited 2024 Aug 14];2017:1–4. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29094063/
Wu Q, Fu N, Chen W, Jin X, He L, Mo C et al Risk factors for patient selection in ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A Single-centre experience. J Minim Access Surg [Internet]. 2022 Apr 1 [cited 2024 Aug 14];18(2):302. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8973494/
Ryan JM, O’Connell E, Rogers AC, Sorensen J, McNamara DA Systematic review and meta-analysis of factors which reduce the length of stay associated with elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. HPB (Oxford) [Internet]. 2021 Feb 1 [cited 2024 Aug 14];23(2):161. https://www.hpbonline.org/article/S1365-182X(20)31125-4/fulltext
Tiryaki C, Bayhan Z, Kargi E, Alponat A (2016 Jan-Mar) Ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a single center experience. J Minim Access Surg 12(1):47–53. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.152096 PMID: 26917919; PMCID: PMC4746975. Available from: Ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a single center experience - PubMed (nih.gov)
Barazanchi H, MacFater AW, Rahiri WS, l J, Tutone S, Hill AG, Joshi GP et al (2018) P A I N evidence-based management of pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a PROSPECT review update on behalf of the PROSPECT collaboration x. Br J Anaesth 121:787–803. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30236241/
Ho C, Spry C Day Surgery versus Overnight Stay for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Laparoscopic Hernia Repair: A Review of Comparative Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines. Day Surgery versus Overnight Stay for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Laparoscopic Hernia Repair: A Review of Comparative Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines [Internet]. 2017 Jun 14 [cited 2024 Aug 14]; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK493354/
Tang H, Dong A, Yan L Day surgery versus overnight stay laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Liver Dis [Internet]. 2015 Jul 1 [cited 2024 Aug 14];47(7):556–61. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25944717/
Shaha A, Yavatmal S, Shirsath K, Yelke V To evaluate post-operative shoulder tip pain in low pressure (10MMHG Co2) versus standard pressure (14MMHG Co2) pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Int J Health Sci (Qassim) [Internet]. 2024 Feb 11 [cited 2024 Aug 14];8(S1):268–73. https://sciencescholar.us/journal/index.php/ijhs/article/view/14691
Salleh AAM, bin Ariffin AC, Hairol O, Zamri Z, Azlanudin A, Hilmi MA et al Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Daycare and Overnight Stay Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Clin Ter [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2024 Aug 14];166(3):165–8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26152626/
Rutherford D, Massie EM, Worsley C, Wilson MSJ (2021) Intraperitoneal local anaesthetic instillation versus no intraperitoneal local anaesthetic instillation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev [Internet]. Oct 25 [cited 2024 Aug 14];10(10). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34693999/
Yang SC, Chang KY, Wei LF, Shyr YM, Ho CM To drain or not to drain: the association between residual intraperitoneal gas and post-laparoscopic shoulder pain for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Scientific Reports 2021 11:1 [Internet]. 2021 Jun 1 [cited 2024 Aug 14];11(1):1–8. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-85714-4
Xiong W, Li M, Wang M, Zhang S, Yang Q The safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the day surgery unit comparing with that in the inpatient unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Available from: https://publications.bads.co.uk/bads-directory-of-procedures--national-dataset-1-p.asp
The British Association of Day Surgery BADS Directory of Procedures & National Dataset [Internet]. [cited 2024 Aug 14]. https://publications.bads.co.uk/bads-directory-of-procedures--national-dataset-1-p.asp
Subirana H, Rey FJ, Barri J et al (2021) Jul-Sep;17(3):311–317 Single-incision versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in an ambulatory surgery setting: A prospective randomised double-blind controlled trial. Journal of Minimal Access Surgery. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32964868/
Hammond C, Surgery D, Manager W, Deakin M Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Fourth Edition Authors Patient Selection. 2024 [cited 2024 Aug 14]; https://bads.co.uk/media/qsvj42pr/laparoscopic-cholecystectomy-fouth-edition.pdf
Öbrink E, Lerström J, Hillström C, Oddby E, Jakobsson JG Can simple perioperative measures improve quality of recovery following ambulatory laparoscopic surgery in females? An open prospective randomised cohort study, comparing nutritional preoperative drink and chewing gum during recovery to standard care. Ann Med Surg (Lond) [Internet]. 2019 Aug 1 [cited 2024 Aug 14];44:20–25. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6593201/
Kumar S, Ali S, Ahmad S, Meena K, Chandola HC Randomised Controlled Trial of Day-Case Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy vs Routine Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Indian J Surg [Internet]. 2015 Dec 1 [cited 2024 Aug 14];77(Suppl 2):520–4. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12262-013-0906-4
Reeves JJ, Burton BN, Broderick RC, Waterman RS, Gabriel RA Obesity and unanticipated hospital admission following outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc [Internet]. 2021 Mar 1 [cited 2024 Aug 14];35(3):1348–54. https://link.springer.com/article/ https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07514-7
Boggett S, Chahal R, Griffiths J, Lin J, Wang D, Williams Z et al A randomised controlled trial comparing deep neuromuscular blockade reversed with sugammadex with moderate neuromuscular block reversed with neostigmine. Anaesthesia [Internet]. 2020 Sep 1 [cited 2024 Aug 14];75(9):1153–1163. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32395901/
Irwin MG, Chung CKE, Ip KY, Wiles MD Influence of propofol-based total intravenous anaesthesia on peri-operative outcome measures: a narrative review. Anaesthesia [Internet]. 2020 Jan 1 [cited 2024 Aug 14];75. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31903578
Pratap MS, Ranjan R, Saurabh G, Singh R (2023) Iatrogenic bile duct injury: a stitch in time. International Surgery Journal [Internet]. May 30 [cited 2024 Aug 14];10(6):1128–30. https://www.ijsurgery.com/index.php/isj/article/view/9674
Cha SM, Park S, Kang H, Baek CW, Jung YH, Cha YJ, In J. Gastric distension with SLIPA versus LMA ProSeal during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized trial. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2014 Jun;24(3):216–220. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182905bb6
Shaikh OA, Aaqil SI, Aftab RM, Khan M Rising incidence of iatrogenic bile duct injuries following cholecystectomy: a cause of worry. International Journal of Surgery: Global Health [Internet]. 2023 Mar [cited 2024 Aug 14];6(2):e119–e119. https://journals.lww.com/ijsgh/fulltext/2023/03010/rising_incidence_of_iatrogenic_bile_duct_injuries.8.aspx
Chun K (2014) Recent classifications of the common bile duct injury. Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 18(3):69–72. https://doi.org/10.14701/kjhbps.2014.18.3.69 Epub 2014 Aug 31. PMID: 26155253; PMCID: PMC4492327. Available from: Recent classifications of the common bile duct injury - PMC (nih.gov)
doi: 10.14701/kjhbps.2014.18.3.69
pubmed: 26155253
pmcid: 4492327
Patel S, Dickson-Lowe R, Qureshi N, Lascelles S WE8.12 Improvement of the Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Service at a District General Hospital During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Br J Surg [Internet]. 2022 Aug 9 [cited 2024 Aug 14];109(Suppl 5). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9384768/
Ramzan R, Afzal D, Butt AI, Hassaan M, Sarwar MZ, Naqi SA Outcome of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy as a Day Case Procedure. Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences [Internet]. 2022 Dec 3 [cited 2024 Aug 14];16(10):262–262. https://pjmhsonline.com/index.php/pjmhs/article/view/3053
Manzia TM, Quaranta C, Filingeri V, Toti L, Anselmo A, Tariciotti L, De Carolis G, Cacciola R, Di Lorenzo N, Sorge R, Angelico R, Monteleone G, Tisone G (2020) Feasibility and cost effectiveness of ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A retrospective cohort study. Ann Med Surg (Lond). ;55:56–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2020.04.036 . PMID: 32461804; PMCID: PMC7240280. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341318629_Feasibility_and_cost_effectiveness_of_ambulatory_laparoscopic_cholecystectomy_A_retrospective_cohort_study