Assessment of intermediate phase post anesthesia quality of recovery and its affecting factors.
Patient satisfaction
Post Anesthesia
Quality of recovery
Journal
BMC anesthesiology
ISSN: 1471-2253
Titre abrégé: BMC Anesthesiol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968535
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Sep 2024
28 Sep 2024
Historique:
received:
05
04
2024
accepted:
26
08
2024
medline:
29
9
2024
pubmed:
29
9
2024
entrez:
28
9
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Recovery after surgery and anesthesia is dependent on patient, surgical, and anesthetic characteristics, as well as the presence of any of numerous adverse sequelae. Postoperative recovery is a complex and multidimensional process that requires a holistic view of the recovery of capacities and homeostasis after anesthesia and surgery. To assess the quality of recovery after anesthesia and its affecting factors at Wachamo University Nigist Eleni Mohamed Memorial Comprehensive Hospital. a prospective observational study was conducted at Wachamo University Nigist Eleni Mohamed Memorial Comprehensive Hospital among 384 surgical patients who undergone under anesthesia. Quality of recovery was assessed by using Quality of Recovery 40. Student t-test and one-way ANOVA were utilized to compare the mean of Quality of recovery in different groups. Binary regression was used to find out the factors affecting Quality of recovery quality of recovery. SPSS 27 was used for analysis. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Sex and smoking history were the factors that we failed to find an association with poor quality of recovery. Preoperative antiemetic administration; premedication with benzodiazepines and emergency procedures were the factors that show potential relation with poor quality of recovery after anesthesia and surgery. Procedures performed under general anesthesia; Patients who had coexisting diseases; post-anesthesia incidence of nausea and vomiting; Visual Analog Scale score >/= 7 during discharge and prolonged duration of surgery were the factors that had a significant association with poor quality of recovery. The magnitude of good quality of recovery was 65.6% whereas 34.4% scored poor quality of recovery. The predictors for the prevalence of poor quality of recovery were found to be orthopedic procedures; procedures undergone under general anesthesia; incidence of post-anesthesia nausea and vomiting; prolonged length of the procedure and severity of pain.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Recovery after surgery and anesthesia is dependent on patient, surgical, and anesthetic characteristics, as well as the presence of any of numerous adverse sequelae. Postoperative recovery is a complex and multidimensional process that requires a holistic view of the recovery of capacities and homeostasis after anesthesia and surgery.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
To assess the quality of recovery after anesthesia and its affecting factors at Wachamo University Nigist Eleni Mohamed Memorial Comprehensive Hospital.
METHOD
METHODS
a prospective observational study was conducted at Wachamo University Nigist Eleni Mohamed Memorial Comprehensive Hospital among 384 surgical patients who undergone under anesthesia. Quality of recovery was assessed by using Quality of Recovery 40. Student t-test and one-way ANOVA were utilized to compare the mean of Quality of recovery in different groups. Binary regression was used to find out the factors affecting Quality of recovery quality of recovery. SPSS 27 was used for analysis. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULT
RESULTS
Sex and smoking history were the factors that we failed to find an association with poor quality of recovery. Preoperative antiemetic administration; premedication with benzodiazepines and emergency procedures were the factors that show potential relation with poor quality of recovery after anesthesia and surgery. Procedures performed under general anesthesia; Patients who had coexisting diseases; post-anesthesia incidence of nausea and vomiting; Visual Analog Scale score >/= 7 during discharge and prolonged duration of surgery were the factors that had a significant association with poor quality of recovery.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The magnitude of good quality of recovery was 65.6% whereas 34.4% scored poor quality of recovery. The predictors for the prevalence of poor quality of recovery were found to be orthopedic procedures; procedures undergone under general anesthesia; incidence of post-anesthesia nausea and vomiting; prolonged length of the procedure and severity of pain.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39342095
doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02696-2
pii: 10.1186/s12871-024-02696-2
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antiemetics
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
342Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Lee L, Tran T, Mayo NE, Carli F, Feldman LS. What does it really mean to recover from an operation? Surgery. 2014;155(2):211–6.
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.10.002
pubmed: 24331759
Borrell-Vega J, Humeidan ML, Bergese SD. Defining quality of recovery – what is important to patients? Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2018;32(3–4):259–68.
doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2018.07.002
pubmed: 30522716
Gornall BF, Myles PS, Smith CL, Burke JA, Leslie K, Pereira MJ, et al. Measurement of quality of recovery using the QoR-40: a quantitative systematic review. Br J Anaesth. 2013;111(2):161–9.
doi: 10.1093/bja/aet014
pubmed: 23471753
Kleif J, Waage J, Christensen KB, Gögenur I. Systematic review of the QoR-15 score, a patient- reported outcome measure measuring quality of recovery after surgery and anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2018;120(1):28–36.
doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.11.013
pubmed: 29397134
Stark PA, Myles PS, Burke JA. Development and psychometric evaluation of a postoperative quality of recovery score. Anesthesiology. 2013;118(6):1332–40.
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318289b84b
pubmed: 23411725
Bowyer A, Jakobsson J, Ljungqvist O, Royse C. A review of the scope and measurement of postoperative quality of recovery. Anaesthesia. 2014;69(11):1266–78.
doi: 10.1111/anae.12730
pubmed: 24888412
Myles P. The Measurement of Quality of Recovery using the QoR-15: a Protocol for a Systematic Review. 2022 Aug 30 [cited 2024 Mar 30]; https://osf.io/78hta/
Royse CF, Newman S, Chung F, Stygall J, McKay RE, Boldt J, et al. Development and feasibility of a scale to assess postoperative recovery. Anesthesiology. 2010;113(4):892–905.
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181d960a9
pubmed: 20601860
Burns D, Perlas A. Regional anaesthesia and quality of recovery after surgery. Anaesthesia. 2020;75(5):576–9.
doi: 10.1111/anae.14980
pubmed: 31944262
Bowyer A, Royse C. The importance of postoperative quality of recovery: influences, assessment, and clinical and prognostic implications. Can J Anesth Can Anesth. 2016;63(2):176–83.
doi: 10.1007/s12630-015-0508-7
Neville A, Lee L, Antonescu I, Mayo NE, Vassiliou MC, Fried GM, et al. Systematic review of outcomes used to evaluate enhanced recovery after surgery. Br J Surg. 2014;101(3):159–70.
doi: 10.1002/bjs.9324
pubmed: 24469616
Ferraz SM, Moreira JP, Mendes LC, Amaral TM, Andrade AR, Santos AR, et al. Evaluation of the quality of recovery and the postoperative health status after elective surgery. Braz J Anesthesiol Engl Ed. 2018;68(6):577–83.
Guimarães-Pereira L, Costa M, Sousa G, Abelha F. Quality of recovery after anaesthesia measured with QoR-40: a prospective observational study. Braz J Anesthesiol Engl Ed. 2016;66(4):369–75.
Sá AC, Sousa G, Santos A, Santos C, Abelha FJ. Quality of recovery after Anesthesia: validation of the Portuguese Version of the quality of Recovery 15 Questionnaire. Acta Médica Port. 2015;28(5):567–74.
doi: 10.20344/amp.6129
Stessel B, Fiddelers AA, Joosten EA, Hoofwijk DMN, Gramke HF, Buhre WFFA. Prevalence and predictors of quality of recovery at Home after Day surgery. Med (Baltim). 2015;94(39):e1553.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001553
Payakachat N, Ali MM, Tilford JM. Can the EQ-5D detect meaningful change? A systematic review. PharmacoEconomics. 2015;33(11):1137–54.
doi: 10.1007/s40273-015-0295-6
pubmed: 26040242
pmcid: 4609224
Berg K, Idvall E, Nilsson U, Årestedt KF, Unosson M. Psychometric evaluation of the post-discharge surgical recovery scale. J Eval Clin Pract. 2010;16(4):794–801.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01197.x
pubmed: 20557414
Moro ET, Silva MAND, Couri MG, Issa DDS, Barbieri JM. Quality of recovery from anesthesia in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery of the lower limbs. Braz J Anesthesiol Engl Ed. 2016;66(6):642–50.
Berg K, Kjellgren K, Unosson M, Årestedt K. Postoperative recovery and its association with health-related quality of life among day surgery patients. BMC Nurs. 2012;11(1):24.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6955-11-24
pubmed: 23148514
pmcid: 3534532
Bowyer AJ, Royse CF. Postoperative recovery and outcomes – what are we measuring and for whom? Anaesthesia. 2016;71(S1):72–7.
doi: 10.1111/anae.13312
pubmed: 26620150
Poitras S, Beaule PE, Dervin GF. Validity of a short-term quality of life questionnaire in patients undergoing joint replacement: the quality of Recovery–40. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27(9):1604–e16081.
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.03.015
pubmed: 22595180
Royse CF, Chung F, Newman S, Stygall J, Wilkinson DJ. Predictors of patient satisfaction with anaesthesia and surgery care: a cohort study using the postoperative quality of Recovery Scale. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2013;30(3):106–10.
doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328357e584
pubmed: 22907610
Phillips NM, Haesler E, Street M, Kent B. Post-anaesthetic discharge scoring criteria: a systematic review. JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2011;9(41):1679–713.
pubmed: 27820558
Price CC, Garvan CW, Monk TG. Type and severity of cognitive decline in older adults after noncardiac surgery. Anesthesiology. 2008;108:8–17.