Cell-bound complement activation products in antiphospholipid antibody-positive patients without other systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases.

The objective of this study was to analyze complement activation in antiphospholipid antibody (aPL)-positive patients without other systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases, using C3/C4 and cell-bound complement activation products (CB-CAPs) (B-lymphocytes [BC4d], erythrocytes [EC4d], and platelets [PC4d]). Persistently aPL-positive patients with or without aPL-related clinical manifestations (thrombotic APS [TAPS], microvascular APS [MAPS], obstetric APS, thrombocytopenia [TP], and/or hemolytic anemia [HA]) were enrolled in a single center study. Blood and clinical data were collected at baseline; a subgroup of patients completed 6- or 12-month follow-up. At baseline, 4/31 (13%) patients had decreased C3/C4, while 7/29 (24%) had elevated BC4d, 11/33 (33%) EC4d, and 12/32 (38%) PC4d. Based on different aPL profiles, all patients with decreased C3/C4 or elevated BC4d, EC4d, and PC4d had triple aPL or isolated lupus anticoagulant positivity. Based on different aPL clinical phenotypes, the number of patients with strongly positive EC4d and PC4d were proportionally higher in those with MAPS/TP/HA, compared to TAPS or no APS. Compared to baseline, the frequencies of BC4d, EC4d, and PC4d positivity were not significantly different in the subgroup of patients during their 6- or 12-month follow-up. There was a weak correlation between C3/C4 and CB-CAPs, especially for PC4d. In summary, complement activation in aPL-positive patients varies based on aPL profiles and clinical phenotypes. Given the higher percentage of aPL-positive patients with abnormal CB-CAPs, compared to C3/C4, and the poor inverse correlation between CB-CAPs and C3/C4, our study generates the hypothesis that CB-CAPs have a role in assessing disease activity and thrombosis risk in aPL-positive patients.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Erkan, Vega, O’Malley and Concoff.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Author DE received research support from company Exagen. Authors TO and AC were employees of company Exagen. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The authors declare that this study received funding from Exagen. The funder had the following involvement in the study: participation in the study design and analysis, and performing study-related blood tests.