Difference between hand and forearm transepidermal water loss and skin pH as an improved method to biomonitor occupational hand eczema: our findings in healthcare workers.


Journal

Arhiv za higijenu rada i toksikologiju
ISSN: 1848-6312
Titre abrégé: Arh Hig Rada Toksikol
Pays: Croatia
ID NLM: 0373100

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 01 08 2024
accepted: 01 09 2024
medline: 6 10 2024
pubmed: 6 10 2024
entrez: 6 10 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The aim of this cross-sectional field study was to establish the condition of hand and forearm skin barrier among dentists and physicians and how it may be associated with personal and work-related factors. The study consisted of an occupational questionnaire, clinical examination of skin on hands, and transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and pH measurements on hands and forearms. The participants were divided in the following groups (N=37 each, N=148 in total): physicians, medical surgeons, dentists, and dental surgeons. We calculated the difference between hand and forearm TEWL and pH (ΔTEWL and ΔpH, respectively) and divided it by the forearm values (ΔTEWL% and ΔpH%, respectively). There was a clear trend of increasing median ΔTEWL%, starting from physicians with non-surgical specialisation (56 %) to medical surgeons (65 %), dentists (104 %), and dental surgeons (108 %), with the latter two groups showing particularly worrisome signs of work-related skin barrier impairment, since they had double the TEWL on hands than on forearms. Although less prominent, the same worsening trend was noted for skin pH, with dental surgeons having on average a 0.3 points higher skin pH on hands than on forearms. These findings were mainly associated with prolonged glove use and male sex. Our findings also suggest that comparing TEWL and pH between hands and forearms can better establish occupational skin barrier impairment on hands. Cilj ove presječne epidemiološke terenske studije bio je istražiti razliku između stanja kožne barijere šaka i podlaktica među zdravstvenim radnicima te povezanosti s osobnim i radnim čimbenicima. Studija je uključivala upitnik o radnoj izloženosti, klinički pregled kože šaka i mjerenje transepidermalnoga gubitka vode (TEWL) i pH kože šaka i podlaktica. Sudionici su bili sljedeći zdravstveni djelatnici (N=37 u svakoj skupini): liječnici-nekirurzi, liječnici-kirurzi, stomatolozi-nekirurzi i stomatolozi-kirurzi. ΔTEWL i ΔpH izračunani su kao razlika vrijednosti na šaci i podlaktici, a ΔTEWL% i ΔpH% kao ta razlika podijeljena s vrijednošću na podlaktici. Uočili smo jasan trend povećanja razlika između stanja kožne barijere šake u odnosu na podlakticu, počevši od liječnika-nekirurga s medijanom ΔTEWL% od 56 %, do liječnika-kirurga (65 %), stomatologa-nekirurga (104 %) i stomatologa-kirurga (108 %). TEWL vrijednosti na šakama u objema skupinama stomatologa u prosjeku su bile dvostruko veće od onih na podlaktici, što je posebno zabrinjavajući pokazatelj oštećenja kožne barijere. Iako manje izražen, isti trend pogoršanja primijećen je za pH kože, pri čemu su kirurzi u prosjeku imali 0,3 viši pH kože šaka nego podlaktica. Dugotrajna uporaba rukavica bila je glavni radni čimbenik povezan s oštećenjem kožne barijere vidljivim u većoj razlici vrijednosti TEWL i pH kože šake i podlaktice, a muški je spol bio osobni čimbenik značajno povezan s višim TEWL-om i nižim pH kože. Naši rezultati upućuju na bolju diferencijaciju oštećenja kožne barijere na rukama zbog profesionalne izloženosti kožnim štetnostima usporedbom rezultata mjerenja na šaci s rezultatom na podlaktici.

Autres résumés

Type: Publisher (hrv)
Cilj ove presječne epidemiološke terenske studije bio je istražiti razliku između stanja kožne barijere šaka i podlaktica među zdravstvenim radnicima te povezanosti s osobnim i radnim čimbenicima. Studija je uključivala upitnik o radnoj izloženosti, klinički pregled kože šaka i mjerenje transepidermalnoga gubitka vode (TEWL) i pH kože šaka i podlaktica. Sudionici su bili sljedeći zdravstveni djelatnici (N=37 u svakoj skupini): liječnici-nekirurzi, liječnici-kirurzi, stomatolozi-nekirurzi i stomatolozi-kirurzi. ΔTEWL i ΔpH izračunani su kao razlika vrijednosti na šaci i podlaktici, a ΔTEWL% i ΔpH% kao ta razlika podijeljena s vrijednošću na podlaktici. Uočili smo jasan trend povećanja razlika između stanja kožne barijere šake u odnosu na podlakticu, počevši od liječnika-nekirurga s medijanom ΔTEWL% od 56 %, do liječnika-kirurga (65 %), stomatologa-nekirurga (104 %) i stomatologa-kirurga (108 %). TEWL vrijednosti na šakama u objema skupinama stomatologa u prosjeku su bile dvostruko veće od onih na podlaktici, što je posebno zabrinjavajući pokazatelj oštećenja kožne barijere. Iako manje izražen, isti trend pogoršanja primijećen je za pH kože, pri čemu su kirurzi u prosjeku imali 0,3 viši pH kože šaka nego podlaktica. Dugotrajna uporaba rukavica bila je glavni radni čimbenik povezan s oštećenjem kožne barijere vidljivim u većoj razlici vrijednosti TEWL i pH kože šake i podlaktice, a muški je spol bio osobni čimbenik značajno povezan s višim TEWL-om i nižim pH kože. Naši rezultati upućuju na bolju diferencijaciju oštećenja kožne barijere na rukama zbog profesionalne izloženosti kožnim štetnostima usporedbom rezultata mjerenja na šaci s rezultatom na podlaktici.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39369331
pii: aiht-2024-75-3885
doi: 10.2478/aiht-2024-75-3885
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

172-179

Informations de copyright

© 2024 Željka Babić et al., published by Sciendo.

Références

Babić Ž, Japundžić-Rapić I, Lugović Mihić L, Macan J. Evaluation of skin barrier condition among physicians and dentists. Dermatitis 2024;35:70–6. doi: 10.1089/derm.2023.0266
doi: 10.1089/derm.2023.0266
Japundžić-Rapić I, Macan J, Babić Ž, Vodanović M, Salarić I, Prpić-Mehičić G, Gabrić D, Pondeljak N, Lugović-Mihić L. Work-related and personal predictors of hand eczema in physicians and dentists: results from a field study. Dermatitis 2024;35:101–5. doi: 10.1089/derm.2022.0071
doi: 10.1089/derm.2022.0071
Šakić F, Babić Ž, Franić Z, Macan J. Characteristics of hand eczema in final-year apprentice nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic. Contact Dermatitis 2022;86:98–106. doi: 10.1111/cod.14006
doi: 10.1111/cod.14006
Henning MAS, Jemec GB, Ibler KS. Occupational skin disease in physicians: a review of the literature. Ann Work Expo Health 2021;65:11–25. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxaa091
doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxaa091
Leggat PA, Kedjarune U, Smith DR. Occupational health problems in modern dentistry: a review. Ind Health 2007;45:611–21. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.45.611
doi: 10.2486/indhealth.45.611
Fluhr JW, Akengin A, Bornkessel A, Fuchs S, Praessler J, Norgauer J, Grieshaber R, Kleesz P, Elsner P. Additive impairment of the barrier function by mechanical irritation, occlusion and sodium lauryl sulphate in vivo . Br J Dermatol 2005;153:125–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06430.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06430.x
Lodén M, Olsson H, Axéll T, Linde YW. Friction, capacitance and transepidermal water loss (TEWL) in dry atopic and normal skin. Br J Dermatol 1992;126:137–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1992.tb07810.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1992.tb07810.x
Lotfinejad N, Peters A, Tartari E, Fankhauser-Rodriguez C, Pires D, Pittet D. Hand hygiene in health care: 20 years of ongoing advances and perspectives. Lancet Infect Dis 2021;21(8):e209–21. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00383-2 . Erratum in: Lancet Infect Dis 2021;21(10):e302. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00476-X
doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00383-2
Myers R, Larson E, Cheng B, Schwartz A, Da Silva K, Kunzel C. Hand hygiene among general practice dentists: a survey of knowledge, attitudes and practices. J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139:948–57. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0282
doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0282
Novák M, Breznický J, Kompaníková J, Malinovská N, Hudečková H. Impact of hand hygiene knowledge on the hand hygiene compliance. Med Glas (Zenica) 2020;17:194–9. doi: 10.17392/1051-20
doi: 10.17392/1051-20
Kanayama H, Sato K, Mori T, Hirai T, Umemura T, Tamura T, Ido T, Kumakiri M, Kusaka Y. Work-related allergy in medical doctors: atopy, exposure to domestic animals, eczema induced by common chemicals and membership of the surgical profession as potential risk factors. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2012;85:455–66. doi: 10.1007/s00420-011-0682-z
doi: 10.1007/s00420-011-0682-z
Larese Filon F, Pesce M, Paulo MS, Loney T, Modenese A, John SM, Kezic S, Macan J. Incidence of occupational contact dermatitis in healthcare workers: a systematic review. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2021;35:1285–9. doi: 10.1111/jdv.17096
doi: 10.1111/jdv.17096
Viau C. Biomonitoring in occupational health: scientific, socio-ethical, and regulatory issues. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2005;207(2 Suppl):347–53. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2004.12.030
doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2004.12.030
Jansen van Rensburg S, Franken A, Du Plessis JL. Measurement of transepidermal water loss, stratum corneum hydration and skin surface pH in occupational settings: A review. Skin Res Technol 2019;25:595–605. doi: 10.1111/srt.12711
doi: 10.1111/srt.12711
Surber C, Humbert P, Abels C, Maibach H. The acid mantle: a myth or an essential part of skin health? Curr Probl Dermatol 2018;54:1–10. doi: 10.1159/000489512
doi: 10.1159/000489512
Mayrovitz HN. Transepidermal water loss and stratum corneum hydration in forearm versus hand palm. Skin Res Technol 2023;29(3):e13218. doi: 10.1111/srt.13218
doi: 10.1111/srt.13218
Babić Ž, Šakić F, Franić Z, Macan J. Skin barrier function in nursing apprentices during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Contact Dermatitis 2022;86:507–13. doi: 10.1111/cod.14069
doi: 10.1111/cod.14069
Jungbauer FHW, van der Harst JJ, Groothoff JW, Coenraads PJ. Skin protection in nursing work: promoting the use of gloves and hand alcohol. Contact Der matitis 2004;51:135–40. doi: 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2004.00422.x
doi: 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2004.00422.x
Pedersen LK, Held E, Johansen JD, Agner T. Less skin irritation from alcohol-based disinfectant than from detergent used for hand disinfection. Br J Dermatol 2005;153:1142–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06875.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06875.x
du Plessis JL, Stefaniak AB, Wilhelm KP. Measurement of skin surface pH. Curr Probl Dermatol 2018;54:19–25. doi: 10.1159/000489514
doi: 10.1159/000489514
Tiedemann D, Clausen ML, John SM, Angelova-Fischer I, Kezic S, Agner T. Effect of glove occlusion on the skin barrier. Contact Dermatitis 2016;74:2–10. doi: 10.1111/cod.12470
doi: 10.1111/cod.12470
Susitaival P, Flyvholm MA, Meding B, Kanerva L, Lindberg M, Svensson A, Olafsson JH. Nordic Occupational Skin Questionnaire (NOSQ-2002): a new tool for surveying occupational skin diseases and exposure. Contact Dermatitis 2003;49:70–6. doi: 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2003.00159.x
doi: 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2003.00159.x
RStudio: Integrated Development for R [computer program]. Boston, Massachusetts: PBC; 2023.
Cheung C, Smith Pease CK, Hoog JO, Hotchkiss SA. Expression and localization of human alcohol and aldehyde dehydrogenase enzymes in skin. Biochim Biophys Res Commun 1999;261:100–7. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1999.0943
doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1999.0943
Houben E, De Paepe K, Rogiers V. Skin condition associated with intensive use of alcoholic gels for hand disinfection: a combination of biophysical and sensorial data. Contact Dermatitis 2006;54:261–7. doi: 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2006.00817.x
doi: 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2006.00817.x
Luebberding S, Krueger N, Kerscher M. Skin physiology in men and women: in vivo evaluation of 300 people including TEWL, SC hydration, sebum content and skin surface pH. Int J Cosmet Sci 2013;35:477–83. doi: 10.1111/ics.12068
doi: 10.1111/ics.12068
Jacobi U, Gautier J, Sterry W, Lademann J. Gender-related differences in the physiology of the stratum corneum. Dermatology 2005;211:312–7. doi: 10.1159/000088499
doi: 10.1159/000088499
Kleesz P, Darlenski R, Fluhr JW. Full-body skin mapping for six biophysical parameters: baseline values at 16 anatomical sites in 125 human subjects. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2012;25:25–33. doi: 10.1159/000330721
doi: 10.1159/000330721
Ehlers C, Ivens UI, Møller ML, Senderovitz T, Serup J. Females have lower skin surface pH than men. A study on the surface of gender, forearm site variation, right/left difference and time of the day on the skin surface pH. Skin Res Technol 2001;7:90–4. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0846.2001.70206.x
doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0846.2001.70206.x
Franić Z, Babić Ž, Milić M, Macan J. Skin characteristics of hairdresser apprentices at the beginning of vocational training. Dermatitis 2021;32:437–43. doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000718
doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000718
Korinth G, Göen T, Koch HM, Merz T, Uter W. Visible and subclinical skin changes in male and female dispatch department workers of newspaper printing plants. Skin Res Technol 2005;11:132–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0846.2005.00104.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0846.2005.00104.x
Mauro M, De Giusti V, Bovenzi M, Larese Filon F. Effectiveness of a secondary prevention protocol for occupational contact dermatitis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2017;31:656–63. doi: 10.1111/jdv.13947
doi: 10.1111/jdv.13947
Halkier-Sørensen L, Thestrup-Pedersen K. The relationship between skin surface temperature, transepidermal water loss and electrical capacitance among workers in the fish processing industry: comparison with other occupations. A field study. Contact Dermatitis 1991;24:345–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1991.tb01749.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1991.tb01749.x
Montero-Vilchez T, Martinez-Lopez A, Cuenca-Barrales C, Quiñones-Vico MI, Sierra-Sanchez A, Molina-Leyva A, Gonçalo M, Cambil-Martin J, Arias-Santiago S. Assessment of hand hygiene strategies on skin barrier function during COVID-19 pandemic: A randomized clinical trial. Contact Dermatitis 2022;86:276–85. doi: 10.1111/cod.14034
doi: 10.1111/cod.14034
Williams C, Wilkinson M, McShane P, Pennington D, Fernandez C, Pierce S. The use of a measure of acute irritation to predict the outcome of repeated usage of hand soap products. Br J Dermatol 2011;164:1311–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10246.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10246.x
Franić Z, Babić Ž, Bjelajac A, Macan J. Factors related to skin health in hairdressing apprentices from two Croatian regions. Contact Dermatitis 2019;81:266–73. doi: 10.1111/cod.13304
doi: 10.1111/cod.13304
Babić Ž, Samardžić T, Macan J. Comparison of beautician and hairdressing apprentices with regard to skin health and skin barrier function. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol 2020;71:190–6. doi: 10.2478/aiht-2020-71-3452
doi: 10.2478/aiht-2020-71-3452
Babić Ž, Turk R, Macan J. Toxicological aspects of increased use of surface and hand disinfectants in Croatia during the COVID-19 pandemic: a preliminary report. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol 2020;71:261–4. doi: 10.2478/aiht-2020-71-3470
doi: 10.2478/aiht-2020-71-3470
Bađun M. Costs of occupational injuries and illnesses in Croatia. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol 2017;68:66–73. doi: 10.1515/aiht-2017-68-2899
doi: 10.1515/aiht-2017-68-2899
Grabovac I, Mustajbegović J. Healthy occupational culture for a worker-friendly workplace. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol 2015;66:1–8. doi: 10.1515/aiht-2015-66-2558
doi: 10.1515/aiht-2015-66-2558
Kujundžić Brkulj M, Macan J. Zaštita kože na radu u hrvatskih frizera (rezultati EvaHair upitnika provedenog u sklopu EU projekta SafeHair ) [Skin protection at work in Croatian hairdressers (results of the EvaHair questionnaire developed within the EU project “SafeHair”), in Croatian]. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol 2013;64:295–303. doi: 10.2478/10004-1254-64-2013-2333
doi: 10.2478/10004-1254-64-2013-2333
Macan J, Kanceljak-Macan B, Milkovic-Kraus S. Pre-employment evaluation of atopy and contact sensitisation in the prevention of allergy-related diseases. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol 2002;53:119–24. PMID: 12365188
pubmed: 12365188

Auteurs

Željka Babić (Ž)

Institute for Medical Research and Occupational Health, Division of Occupational and Environmental Health, Zagreb, Croatia.

Franka Šakić (F)

Institute for Medical Research and Occupational Health, Division of Occupational and Environmental Health, Zagreb, Croatia.

Iva Japudžić Rapić (IJ)

Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Department of Dermatovenereology, Zagreb, Croatia.

Liborija Lugović-Mihić (L)

Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Department of Dermatovenereology, Zagreb, Croatia.
University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia.

Jelena Macan (J)

Institute for Medical Research and Occupational Health, Division of Occupational and Environmental Health, Zagreb, Croatia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH