Participants' baseline characteristics and feedback of the nature-based social intervention "friends in nature" among lonely older adults in assisted living facilities in finland: a randomised controlled trial of the RECETAS EU-project.


Journal

BMC geriatrics
ISSN: 1471-2318
Titre abrégé: BMC Geriatr
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968548

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 Oct 2024
Historique:
received: 26 02 2024
accepted: 25 09 2024
medline: 8 10 2024
pubmed: 8 10 2024
entrez: 7 10 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Loneliness is common among older adults in institutional settings. It leads to adverse effects on health and wellbeing, for which nature contact with peers in turn may have positive impact. However, the effects of nature engagement among older adults have not been studied in randomised controlled trials (RCT). The "Friends in Nature" (FIN) group intervention RCT for lonely older adults in Helsinki assisted living facilities (ALFs) aims to explore the effects of peer-related nature experiences on loneliness and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). In this study we aim describe the participants' baseline characteristics of the RCT, feasibility of FIN intervention and intervention participants' feedback on the FIN. Lonely participants were recruited from 22 ALFs in Helsinki area, Finland, and randomised into two groups: 1) nature-based social intervention once a week for nine weeks (n = 162) and 2) usual care (n = 157). Demographics, diagnoses and medication use were retrieved from medical records, and baseline cognition, functioning, HRQoL, loneliness and psychological wellbeing were assessed. Primary trial outcomes will be participants' loneliness (De Jong Giervald Loneliness Scale) and HRQoL (15D). The mean age of participants was 83 years, 73% were female and mean Minimental State Examination of 21 points. The participants were living with multiple co-morbidities and/or disabilities. The intervention and control groups were comparable at baseline. The adherence with intervention was moderate, with a mean attendance of 6.8 out of the nine sessions. Of the participants, 14% refused, fell ill or were deceased, and therefore, participated three sessions or less. General subjective alleviation of loneliness was achieved in 57% of the intervention participants. Of the respondents, 96% would have recommended a respective group intervention to other older adults. Intervention participants appreciated their nature excursions and experiences. We have successfully randomised 319 lonely residents in assisted living facilities into a trial about the effects of nature experiences in a group-format. The feedback from participants was favourable. The trial will provide important information about possibilities of alleviating loneliness with peer-related nature-based experiences in frail residents. ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT05507684. Registration 19/08/2022.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Loneliness is common among older adults in institutional settings. It leads to adverse effects on health and wellbeing, for which nature contact with peers in turn may have positive impact. However, the effects of nature engagement among older adults have not been studied in randomised controlled trials (RCT). The "Friends in Nature" (FIN) group intervention RCT for lonely older adults in Helsinki assisted living facilities (ALFs) aims to explore the effects of peer-related nature experiences on loneliness and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). In this study we aim describe the participants' baseline characteristics of the RCT, feasibility of FIN intervention and intervention participants' feedback on the FIN.
METHODS METHODS
Lonely participants were recruited from 22 ALFs in Helsinki area, Finland, and randomised into two groups: 1) nature-based social intervention once a week for nine weeks (n = 162) and 2) usual care (n = 157). Demographics, diagnoses and medication use were retrieved from medical records, and baseline cognition, functioning, HRQoL, loneliness and psychological wellbeing were assessed. Primary trial outcomes will be participants' loneliness (De Jong Giervald Loneliness Scale) and HRQoL (15D).
RESULTS RESULTS
The mean age of participants was 83 years, 73% were female and mean Minimental State Examination of 21 points. The participants were living with multiple co-morbidities and/or disabilities. The intervention and control groups were comparable at baseline. The adherence with intervention was moderate, with a mean attendance of 6.8 out of the nine sessions. Of the participants, 14% refused, fell ill or were deceased, and therefore, participated three sessions or less. General subjective alleviation of loneliness was achieved in 57% of the intervention participants. Of the respondents, 96% would have recommended a respective group intervention to other older adults. Intervention participants appreciated their nature excursions and experiences.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
We have successfully randomised 319 lonely residents in assisted living facilities into a trial about the effects of nature experiences in a group-format. The feedback from participants was favourable. The trial will provide important information about possibilities of alleviating loneliness with peer-related nature-based experiences in frail residents.
TRIAL REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT05507684. Registration 19/08/2022.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39375627
doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05408-0
pii: 10.1186/s12877-024-05408-0
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT05507684']

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

812

Investigateurs

Acurio David (A)
Bártová Alzbeta (B)
Cattaneo Lucie (C)
Holmerova Iva (H)
Garcia Gabriela (G)

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Perlman D, Peplau LA. Toward a social psychology of loneliness. In: Duck S, Gilmour R, editors. Personal relationships in disorder. London: Academic Press; 1981. p. 31–56.
Ong AD, Uchino BN, Wethington E. Loneliness and health in older adults: a mini-review and synthesis. Gerontology. 2016;62(4):443–9. https://doi.org/10.1159/000441651 .
doi: 10.1159/000441651 pubmed: 26539997
Gardiner C, Laud P, Heaton T, Gott M. What is the prevalence of loneliness amongst older people living in residential and nursing care homes? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Age Ageing. 2020;49:748–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaa049 .
doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaa049 pubmed: 32396600
Cacioppo S, Capitanio JP, Cacioppo JT. Toward a neurology of loneliness. Psychol Bull. 2014;140(6):1464–504. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037618 . Epub 2014 Sep 15.
doi: 10.1037/a0037618 pubmed: 25222636 pmcid: 5130107
Jansson AH, Muurinen S, Savikko N, Soini H, Suominen M, Kautiainen H, Pitkala KH. Loneliness in nursing homes and assisted living facilities: prevalence, associated factors and prognosis. J Nurs Home Res Sci. 2017;3:43–9. https://doi.org/10.14283/jnhrs.2017.7 .
doi: 10.14283/jnhrs.2017.7
Gerst-Emerson K, Jayawardhana J. Loneliness as a public health issue: the impact of loneliness on health care utilization among older adults. Am J Public Health. 2015;105:1013–9. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302427 .
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302427 pubmed: 25790413 pmcid: 4386514
Aerts R, Honnay O, Van Nieuwenhuyse A. Biodiversity and human health: mechanisms and evidence of the positive health effects of diversity in nature and green spaces. Br Med Bull. 2018;127(1):5–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldy021 .
doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldy021 pubmed: 30007287
Jones R, Tarter R, Ross AM. Greenspace interventions, stress and cortisol: a scoping review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(6):2802. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18062802 .
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18062802 pubmed: 33801917 pmcid: 8001092
Yuan Y, Huang F, Lin F, Zhu P, Zhu P. Green space exposure on mortality and cardiovascular outcomes in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021;33(7):1783–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-020-01710-0 .
doi: 10.1007/s40520-020-01710-0 pubmed: 32951189
Moeller C, King N, Burr V, Gibbs GR, Gomersall T. Nature-based interventions in institutional and organisational settings: a scoping review. Int J Environ Health Res. 2018;28(3):293–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603123.2018.1468425 .
doi: 10.1080/09603123.2018.1468425 pubmed: 29699406
Zhao Y, Liu Y, Wang Z. Effectiveness of horticultural therapy in people with dementia: a quantitative systematic review. J Clin Nurs. 2022;31(13–14):1983–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15204 .
doi: 10.1111/jocn.15204 pubmed: 32017241
Haluza D, Schönbauer R, Cervinka R. Green perspectives for public health: a narrative review on the physiological effects of experiencing outdoor nature. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014;11(5):5445–61. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110505445 .
doi: 10.3390/ijerph110505445 pubmed: 24852391 pmcid: 4053896
Leavell MA, Leiferman JA, Gascon M, Braddick F, Gonzalez JC, Litt JS. Nature-based social prescribing in urban settings to improve social connectedness and mental well-being: review. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2019;6(4):297–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-019-00251-7 .
doi: 10.1007/s40572-019-00251-7 pubmed: 31713144
Robinson JM, Brindley P, Cameron R, MacCarthy D, Jorgensen A. Nature’s role in supporting health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a geospatial and socioecological study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(5):2227. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052227 .
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052227 pubmed: 33668228 pmcid: 7967714
Gardiner C, Geldenhuys G, Gott M. Interventions to reduce social isolation and loneliness among older people: an integrative review. Health Soc Care Community. 2018;26(2):147–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12367 .
doi: 10.1111/hsc.12367 pubmed: 27413007
Reinhardt GY, Vidovic D, Hammerton C. Understanding loneliness: a systematic review of the impact of social prescribing initiatives on loneliness. Perspect Public Health. 2021;141(4):204–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757913920967040 .
doi: 10.1177/1757913920967040 pubmed: 34159848 pmcid: 8295963
Pitkala KH, Routasalo P, Kautiainen H, Tilvis RS. Effects of psychosocial group rehabilitation on health, use of health care services, and mortality of older persons suffering from loneliness: a randomized, controlled trial. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2009;64(7):792–800. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glp011 .
doi: 10.1093/gerona/glp011 pubmed: 19223606
Coll-Planas L, Carbó-Cardeña A, Jansson A, Dostálová V, Bartova A, Rautiainen L, et al. Nature-based social interventions to address loneliness among vulnerable populations: a common study protocol for three related randomized controlled trials in Barcelona, Helsinki, and Prague within the RECETAS European project. BMC Public Health. 2024;24(1):172. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17547-x .
doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17547-x pubmed: 38218784 pmcid: 10787456
Litt JS, Coll-Planas L, Sachs A, Rochau U, Beacom A, Jansson A, et al. RECETAS: Rationale and logic model of a nature-based social intervention for people experiencing loneliness. Cities and Health. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/23748834.2023.2300207 . (in press).
doi: 10.1080/23748834.2023.2300207
Morris JN, Fries BE, Mehr DR, Hawes C, Phillips C, Mor V, et al. MDS cognitive performance scale. J Gerontol. 1994;49(4):M174–82. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/49.4.m174 .
doi: 10.1093/geronj/49.4.m174 pubmed: 8014392
Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state” a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12:189–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 .
doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 pubmed: 1202204
Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8 .
doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8 pubmed: 3558716
Merikanto I, Kronholm E, Peltonen M, Laatikainen T, Lahti T, Partonen T. Relation of chronotype to sleep complaints in the general Finnish population. Chronobiol Int. 2012;29(3):311–7. https://doi.org/10.3109/07420528.2012.655870 .
doi: 10.3109/07420528.2012.655870 pubmed: 22390244
Hughes CP, Berg L, Danziger WL, Coben LA, Martin RL. A new clinical scale for the staging of dementia. Br J Psychiatry. 1982;140:566–72. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.140.6.566 .
doi: 10.1192/bjp.140.6.566 pubmed: 7104545
Forti P, Olivelli V, Rietti E, Maltoni B, Ravaglia G. Diagnostic performance of an executive clock drawing task (CLOX) as a screening test for mild cognitive impairment in elderly persons with cognitive complaints. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2010;30:20–7. https://doi.org/10.1159/000315515 .
doi: 10.1159/000315515 pubmed: 20606441
Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J. 1965;14:61–5.
pubmed: 14258950
Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56(3):M146–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/56.3.m146 .
doi: 10.1093/gerona/56.3.m146 pubmed: 11253156
Kurlowicz L, Greenberg SA. The geriatric depression scale (GDS). Am J Nurs. 2007;107(10):67–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000292207.37066.2f .
doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000292207.37066.2f
De Jong GJ, Van Tilburg T. The De Jong Gierveld short scales for emotional and social loneliness: tested on data from 7 countries in the UN generations and gender surveys. Eur J Ageing. 2010;7(2):121–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-010-0144-6 .
doi: 10.1007/s10433-010-0144-6
Sintonen H. The 15D instrument of health-related quality of life: properties and applications. Ann Med. 2001;33:328–36. https://doi.org/10.3109/07853890109002086 .
doi: 10.3109/07853890109002086 pubmed: 11491191
De Jong Gierveld J, Tilburg TV. A 6-item scale for overall, emotional, and social loneliness: confirmatory tests on survey data. Res Aging. 1 de septiembre de 2006;28(5):582-98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027506289 .
Liimatta HA, Lampela P, Kautiainen H, Laitinen-Parkkonen P, Pitkala KH. The effects of preventive home visits on older people’s use of health care and social services and related costs. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2020;75(8):1586–93. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glz139 .
doi: 10.1093/gerona/glz139 pubmed: 31139827
Routasalo PE, Tilvis RS, Kautiainen H, Pitkala KH. Effects of psychosocial group rehabilitation on social functioning, loneliness and well-being of lonely, older people: randomized controlled trial. J Adv Nurs. 2009;65:297–305. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04837.x .
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04837.x pubmed: 19054177
Savikko N. Loneliness of Older People and Elements of an Intervention for Its Alleviation. [medical thesis]. Annales Universitates Turkuensis. Turku: University of Turku; 2008.
Jansson AH, Savikko NM, Pitkälä KH. Training professionals to implement a group model for alleviating loneliness among older people – 10-year follow-up study. Educ Gerontol. 2018;44(2–3):119–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2017.1420005 .
doi: 10.1080/03601277.2017.1420005
Pitkala KH, Savikko N, Routasalo P. Group dynamics in older people’s closed groups. Findings from Finnish psychosocial group rehabilitation for lonely older people. In: Derrickson H (Ed.): Group Therapy. Hauppauge, N.Y.: Nova Publishers; 2015. pp. 39–73.
Onder G, Carpenter I, Finne-Soveri H, Gindin J, Frijters D, Henrard JC, et al. Assessment of nursing home residents in Europe: the Services and Health for Elderly in Long TERm care (SHELTER) study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;9(12):5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-5 .
doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-5
Aalto UL, Finne-Soveri H, Kautiainen H, Öhman H, Roitto HM, Pitkälä KH. Relationship between anticholinergic burden and health-related quality of life among residents in long-term care. J Nutr Health Aging. 2021;25(2):224–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-020-1493-2 .
Juola AL, Bjorkman M, Pylkkanen S, Finne-Soveri UH, Soini H, Kautiainen H, et al. Feasibility and baseline findings of an educational intervention in a randomized, controlled trial to optimize drug treatment among residents assisted living facilities. Eur Geriatric Med. 2014;5:195–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurger.2014.02.005 .
doi: 10.1016/j.eurger.2014.02.005

Auteurs

Kaisu H Pitkala (KH)

Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Helsinki, PO Box 20, 00014, Helsinki, Finland. kaisu.pitkala@helsinki.fi.
Unit of Primary Health Care, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland. kaisu.pitkala@helsinki.fi.

Laura Rautiainen (L)

Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Helsinki, PO Box 20, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.
The Finnish Association for the Welfare of Older Adults, Helsinki, Finland.

Ulla L Aalto (UL)

University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Department of Geriatrics, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.

Hannu Kautiainen (H)

Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Helsinki, PO Box 20, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.
Unit of Primary Health Care, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.

Annika Kolster (A)

Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Helsinki, PO Box 20, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.
Health Services, Western Uusimaa Wellbeing Services, Espoo, Finland.

Marja-Liisa Laakkonen (ML)

Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Helsinki, PO Box 20, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.
Department of Social Services and Health Care, Geriatric Clinic, Helsinki Hospital, City of Helsinki, Finland.

Timo Partonen (T)

Department of Healthcare and Social Welfare, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.

Hanna-Maria Roitto (HM)

University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Department of Social Services and Health Care, Geriatric Clinic, Helsinki Hospital, City of Helsinki, Finland.

Timo E Strandberg (TE)

University of Helsinki, and, Helsinki University Hospital , Helsinki, Finland.
University of Oulu, Center for Life Course Health Research, Oulu, Finland.

Nerkez Opacin (N)

RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia.

Sibylle Puntscher (S)

Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT TIROL - University for Health Sciences and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria.

Uwe Siebert (U)

Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT TIROL - University for Health Sciences and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria.
Institute for Technology Assessment and Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Center for Health Decision Science, Departments of Epidemiology and Health Policy & Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

Laura Coll-Planas (L)

Research Group On Methodology, Methods, Models and Outcomes of Health and Social Sciences (M3O), Faculty of Health Sciences and Welfare. Centre for Health and Social Care Research (CESS), Vic, Spain.
University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia (UVic-UCC). Institute for Research and Innovation in Life Sciences and Health in Central Catalonia (IRIS-CC), Vic, Spain.

Ashby L Sachs (AL)

Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain.
CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.

Jill S Litt (JS)

Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain.

Anu H Jansson (AH)

Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Helsinki, PO Box 20, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.
The Finnish Association for the Welfare of Older Adults, Helsinki, Finland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH