Elucidation of the noncovalent interactions driving enzyme activity guides branching enzyme engineering for α-glucan modification.


Journal

Nature communications
ISSN: 2041-1723
Titre abrégé: Nat Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101528555

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 Oct 2024
Historique:
received: 22 01 2024
accepted: 23 09 2024
medline: 10 10 2024
pubmed: 10 10 2024
entrez: 9 10 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Branching enzymes (BEs) confer to α-glucans, the primary energy-storage reservoir in nature, a variety of features, like slow digestion. The full catalytic cycle of BEs can be divided in six steps, namely two covalent catalytic steps involving glycosylation and transglycosylation, and four noncatalytic steps involving substrate binding and transfers (SBTs). Despite the ever-growing wealth of biochemical and structural information on BEs, clear mechanistic insights into SBTs from an industrial-performance perspective are still missing. Here, we report a Rhodothermus profundi BE (RpBE) endowed with twice as much enzymatic activity as the Rhodothermus obamensis BE currently used in industry. Furthermore, we focus on the SBTs for RpBE by means of large-scale computations supported by experiment. Engineering of the crucial positions responsible for the initial substrate-binding step improves enzymatic activity significantly, while offering a possibility to customize product types. In addition, we show that the high-efficiency substrate-transfer steps preceding glycosylation and transglycosylation are the main reason for the remarkable enzymatic activity of RpBE, suggestive of engineering directions for the BE family.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39384762
doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-53018-6
pii: 10.1038/s41467-024-53018-6
doi:

Substances chimiques

Glucans 0
1,4-alpha-Glucan Branching Enzyme EC 2.4.1.18
Bacterial Proteins 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

8760

Subventions

Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China)
ID : 22005157

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Ban, X. et al. Bacterial 1,4-alpha-glucan branching enzymes: characteristics, preparation and commercial applications. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 40, 380–396 (2020).
pubmed: 31996051 doi: 10.1080/07388551.2020.1713720
Chakraborty, R., Kalita, P. & Sen, S. Natural starch in biomedical and food industry: perception and overview. Curr. Drug. Discov. Technol. 16, 355–367 (2019).
pubmed: 30280669 doi: 10.2174/1570163815666181003143732
Punia, S. Barley starch modifications: physical, chemical and enzymatic - A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 144, 578–585 (2020).
pubmed: 31843612 doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.12.088
Li, X. et al. Partial branching enzyme treatment increases the low glycaemic property and α-1,6 branching ratio of maize starch. Food Chem. 164, 502–509 (2014).
pubmed: 24996363 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.05.074
Tetlow, I. J. & Emes, M. J. A review of starch-branching enzymes and their role in amylopectin biosynthesis. IUBMB Life 66, 546–558 (2014).
pubmed: 25196474 doi: 10.1002/iub.1297
Bilyard, M. K. et al. Palladium-mediated enzyme activation suggests multiphase initiation of glycogenesis. Nature 563, 235–240 (2018).
pubmed: 30356213 doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0644-7
Huynh, N., Ou, Q., Cox, P., Lill, R. & King-Jones, K. Glycogen branching enzyme controls cellular iron homeostasis via Iron Regulatory Protein 1 and mitoNEET. Nat. Commun. 10, 5463 (2019).
pubmed: 31784520 pmcid: 6884552 doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13237-8
Bürgy, L. et al. Coalescence and directed anisotropic growth of starch granule initials in subdomains of Arabidopsis thaliana chloroplasts. Nat. Commun. 12, 6944 (2021).
pubmed: 34836943 pmcid: 8626487 doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27151-5
Baecker, P. A., Greenberg, E. & Preiss, J. Biosynthesis of bacterial glycogen. primary structure of Escherichia coli 1,4-alpha-D-glucan:1,4-alpha-D-glucan 6-alpha-D-(1, 4-alpha-D-glucano)-transferase as deduced from the nucleotide sequence of the glg B gene. J. Biol. Chem. 261, 8738–8743 (1986).
pubmed: 3013861 doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)84443-5
Svensson, B. Regional distant sequence homology between amylases, alpha-glucosidases and transglucanosylases. FEBS Lett. 230, 72–76 (1988).
pubmed: 2450787 doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(88)80644-6
Palomo, M. et al. Thermus thermophilus glycoside hydrolase family 57 branching enzyme: crystal structure, mechanism of action, and products formed. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 3520–3530 (2011).
pubmed: 21097495 doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.179515
Bax, H. H. M., van der Maarel, M. & Jurak, E. Alpha-1,4-transglycosylation activity of GH57 glycogen branching enzymes is higher in the absence of a flexible loop with a conserved tyrosine residue. Polym. (Basel) 15, 2777 (2023).
doi: 10.3390/polym15132777
Xiang, G., Leemhuis, H. & van der Maarel, M. Structural elements determining the transglycosylating activity of glycoside hydrolase family 57 glycogen branching enzymes. Proteins 90, 155–163 (2022).
pubmed: 34346105 doi: 10.1002/prot.26200
Lombard, V., Golaconda Ramulu, H., Drula, E., Coutinho, P. M. & Henrissat, B. The carbohydrate-active enzymes database (CAZy) in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res 42, D490–D495 (2014).
pubmed: 24270786 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1178
Ye, X. et al. Glycogen branching enzyme with a novel chain transfer mode derived from corallococcus sp. strain EGB and its potential applications. J. Agric. Food Chem. 70, 4735–4748 (2022).
pubmed: 35404056 doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.2c01621
Janeček, Š. & Svensson, B. Amylolytic glycoside hydrolases. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 73, 2601–2602 (2016).
pubmed: 27130913 pmcid: 11108492 doi: 10.1007/s00018-016-2240-z
Hayashi, M. et al. Bound substrate in the structure of cyanobacterial branching enzyme supports a new mechanistic model. J. Biol. Chem. 292, 5465–5475 (2017).
pubmed: 28193843 doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.755629
Kelly, R. M., Leemhuis, H. & Dijkhuizen, L. Conversion of a cyclodextrin glucanotransferase into an alpha-amylase: assessment of directed evolution strategies. Biochemistry 46, 11216–11222 (2007).
pubmed: 17824673 doi: 10.1021/bi701160h
Ban, X. et al. Alternations in the chain length distribution of polysaccharides by adjusting the active sites of the 1,4-α-glucan branching enzyme. Food Res. Int. 162, 112119 (2022).
pubmed: 36461352 doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.112119
Feng, L. et al. Crystal structures of Escherichia coli branching enzyme in complex with linear oligosaccharides. Biochemistry 54, 6207–6218 (2015).
pubmed: 26280198 doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.5b00228
Feng, L. et al. Crystal structures of Escherichia coli branching enzyme in complex with cyclodextrins. Acta Crystallogr. D. Struct. Biol. 72, 641–647 (2016).
pubmed: 27139627 doi: 10.1107/S2059798316003272
Chaen, K., Noguchi, J., Omori, T., Kakuta, Y. & Kimura, M. Crystal structure of the rice branching enzyme I (BEI) in complex with maltopentaose. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 424, 508–511 (2012).
pubmed: 22771800 doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.06.145
Froese, D. S. et al. Structural basis of glycogen branching enzyme deficiency and pharmacologic rescue by rational peptide design. Hum. Mol. Genet. 24, 5667–5676 (2015).
pubmed: 26199317 pmcid: 4581599 doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddv280
Gavgani, H. N. et al. A structural explanation for the mechanism and specificity of plant branching enzymes I and IIb. J. Biol. Chem. 298, 101395 (2022).
pubmed: 34762912 doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.101395
Fawaz, R. et al. The structure of maltooctaose-bound escherichia coli branching enzyme suggests a mechanism for donor chain specificity. Molecules 28, 4377 (2023).
pubmed: 37298853 pmcid: 10254366 doi: 10.3390/molecules28114377
Zhang, X., Leemhuis, H. & van der Maarel, M. Synthesis of highly branched alpha-glucans with different structures using GH13 and GH57 glycogen branching enzymes. Carbohydr. Polym. 216, 231–237 (2019).
pubmed: 31047062 doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.04.038
Li, D. et al. A cold-active 1,4-alpha-glucan branching enzyme from Bifidobacterium longum reduces the retrogradation and enhances the slow digestibility of wheat starch. Food Chem. 324, 126855 (2020).
pubmed: 32344341 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.126855
Sorndech, W. et al. Synergistic amylomaltase and branching enzyme catalysis to suppress cassava starch digestibility. Carbohydr. Polym. 132, 409–418 (2015).
pubmed: 26256365 doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.05.084
Huang, J. et al. Discovery of deaminase functions by structure-based protein clustering. Cell 186, 3182–3195 (2023).
pubmed: 37379837 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.05.041
Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).
pubmed: 34265844 pmcid: 8371605 doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2
Varadi, M. et al. AlphaFold Protein Structure Database: massively expanding the structural coverage of protein-sequence space with high-accuracy models. Nucleic Acids Res 50, D439–D444 (2022).
pubmed: 34791371 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab1061
Laurents, D. V. AlphaFold 2 and NMR spectroscopy: partners to understand protein structure, dynamics and function. Front. Mol. Biosci. 9, 906437 (2022).
pubmed: 35655760 pmcid: 9152297 doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2022.906437
Yang, J., Wang, Y. & Zhang, Y. ResQ: an approach to unified estimation of B-factor and residue-specific error in protein structure prediction. J. Mol. Biol. 428, 693–701 (2016).
pubmed: 26437129 doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.09.024
Honorato, R. V. et al. Structural biology in the clouds: the WeNMR-EOSC Ecosystem. Front Mol. Biosci. 8, 729513 (2021).
pubmed: 34395534 pmcid: 8356364 doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.729513
Honorato, R. V. et al. The HADDOCK2.4 web server for integrative modeling of biomolecular complexes. Nat Protoc (2024).
Boittier, E. D., Burns, J. M., Gandhi, N. S. & Ferro, V. GlycoTorch Vina: docking designed and tested for glycosaminoglycans. J. Chem. Inf. Model 60, 6328–6343 (2020).
pubmed: 33152249 doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00373
Nivedha, A. K., Thieker, D. F., Makeneni, S., Hu, H. & Woods, R. J. Vina-Carb: Improving glycosidic angles during carbohydrate docking. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 12, 892–901 (2016).
pubmed: 26744922 pmcid: 5140039 doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00834
Rodrigues, J. P. et al. Clustering biomolecular complexes by residue contacts similarity. Proteins 80, 1810–7 (2012).
pubmed: 22489062 doi: 10.1002/prot.24078
Wang, Z. et al. Expression and characterization of an extremely thermophilic 1,4-α-glucan branching enzyme from Rhodothermus obamensis STB05. Protein Expr. Purif. 164, 105478 (2019).
pubmed: 31421223 doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2019.105478
Löffler, P., Schmitz, S., Hupfeld, E., Sterner, R. & Merkl, R. Rosetta:MSF: a modular framework for multi-state computational protein design. PLoS Comput. Biol. 13, e1005600 (2017).
pubmed: 28604768 pmcid: 5484525 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005600
Ban, X. et al. The amino acid on the top of the active groove allosterically modulates product specificity of the 1,4-α-glucan branching enzyme. Food Chem. 384, 132458 (2022).
pubmed: 35219229 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132458
Jiang, H. et al. Flexible loop in carbohydrate-binding module 48 allosterically modulates substrate binding of the 1,4-alpha-glucan branching enzyme. J. Agric. Food Chem. 69, 5755–5763 (2021).
pubmed: 33988022 doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c00293
Takata, H. et al. Properties and active center of the thermostable branching enzyme from Bacillus stearothermophilus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60, 3096–3104 (1994).
pubmed: 7944355 pmcid: 201776 doi: 10.1128/aem.60.9.3096-3104.1994
Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Methods Enzymol. 276, 307–326 (1997).
pubmed: 27754618 doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(97)76066-X
McCoy, A. J. et al. Phaser crystallographic software. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 40, 658–674 (2007).
pubmed: 19461840 pmcid: 2483472 doi: 10.1107/S0021889807021206
Liebschner, D. et al. Macromolecular structure determination using X-rays, neutrons and electrons: recent developments in Phenix. Acta Crystallogr. D. Struct. Biol. 75, 861–877 (2019).
pubmed: 31588918 pmcid: 6778852 doi: 10.1107/S2059798319011471
Afonine, P. V. et al. Towards automated crystallographic structure refinement with phenix.refine. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 68, 352–367 (2012).
pubmed: 22505256 pmcid: 3322595 doi: 10.1107/S0907444912001308
Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 2126–2132 (2004).
pubmed: 15572765 doi: 10.1107/S0907444904019158
Brünger, A. T. et al. Crystallography & NMR system: a new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 54, 905–921 (1998).
pubmed: 9757107 doi: 10.1107/S0907444998003254
Zong, Z. et al. Mechanism and biomass association of glucuronoyl esterase: an α/β hydrolase with potential in biomass conversion. Nat. Commun. 13, 1449 (2022).
pubmed: 35304453 pmcid: 8933493 doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28938-w
Knott, B. C., Crowley, M. F., Himmel, M. E., Stahlberg, J. & Beckham, G. T. Carbohydrate-protein interactions that drive processive polysaccharide translocation in enzymes revealed from a computational study of cellobiohydrolase processivity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 8810–8819 (2014).
pubmed: 24869982 doi: 10.1021/ja504074g
Zong, Z. et al. Lysine mutation of the claw-arm-like loop accelerates catalysis by cellobiohydrolases. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 14451–14459 (2019).
pubmed: 31432675 doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b08477
Zong, Z., Liu, X., Ye, Z. & Liu, D. A double-switch pHLIP system enables selective enrichment of circulating tumor microenvironment-derived extracellular vesicles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 120, e2214912120 (2023).
pubmed: 36595702 pmcid: 9926244 doi: 10.1073/pnas.2214912120
Phillips, J. C. et al. Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J. Comput. Chem. 26, 1781–1802 (2005).
pubmed: 16222654 pmcid: 2486339 doi: 10.1002/jcc.20289
Vanommeslaeghe, K. et al. CHARMM general force field: A force field for drug-like molecules compatible with the CHARMM all-atom additive biological force fields. J. Comput. Chem. 31, 671–690 (2010).
pubmed: 19575467 pmcid: 2888302 doi: 10.1002/jcc.21367
MacKerell, A. D. et al. All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J. Phys. Chem. B 102, 3586–3616 (1998).
pubmed: 24889800 doi: 10.1021/jp973084f
MacKerell, A. D. Jr., Feig, M. & Brooks, C. L. 3rd Improved treatment of the protein backbone in empirical force fields. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 698–699 (2004).
pubmed: 14733527 doi: 10.1021/ja036959e
Jorgensen, W. L., Chandrasekhar, J., Madura, J. D., Impey, R. W. & Klein, M. L. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J. Chem. Phys. 79, 926–935 (1983).
doi: 10.1063/1.445869
Uhlenbeck, G. E. & Ornstein, L. S. On the theory of the Brownian motion. Phys. Rev. 36, 823–841 (1930).
doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.36.823
Feller, S. E., Zhang, Y., Pastor, R. W. & Brooks, B. R. Constant pressure molecular dynamics simulation: The langevin piston method. J. Chem. Phys. 103, 4613–4621 (1995).
doi: 10.1063/1.470648
Miyamoto, S. & Kollman, P. A. Settle: an analytical version of the SHAKE and RATTLE algorithm for rigid water models. J. Comput. Chem. 13, 952–962 (1992).
doi: 10.1002/jcc.540130805
Ryckaert, J.-P., Ciccotti, G. & Berendsen, H. J. C. Numerical integration of the cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: molecular dynamics of n-alkanes. J. Comput. Phys. 23, 327–341 (1977).
doi: 10.1016/0021-9991(77)90098-5
Andersen, H. C. Rattle: a “velocity” version of the shake algorithm for molecular dynamics calculations. J. Comput. Phys. 52, 24–34 (1983).
doi: 10.1016/0021-9991(83)90014-1
Humphrey, W., Dalke, A. & Schulten, K. VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 14, 33–8 (1996).
Fu, H., Shao, X., Cai, W. & Chipot, C. Taming rugged free energy landscapes using an average force. Acc. Chem. Res. 52, 3254–3264 (2019).
pubmed: 31680510 doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00473
Marcos-Alcalde, I., Setoain, J., Mendieta-Moreno, J. I., Mendieta, J. & Gómez-Puertas, P. MEPSA: minimum energy pathway analysis for energy landscapes. Bioinformatics 31, 3853–5 (2015).
pubmed: 26231428 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv453

Auteurs

Zhiyou Zong (Z)

National Engineering Research Center of Industrial Enzymes, Tianjin Institute of Industrial Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Tianjin, China. zongzhy@tib.cas.cn.
National Center of Technology Innovation for Synthetic Biology, Tianjin, China. zongzhy@tib.cas.cn.

Xuewen Zhang (X)

National Engineering Research Center of Industrial Enzymes, Tianjin Institute of Industrial Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Tianjin, China.
National Center of Technology Innovation for Synthetic Biology, Tianjin, China.

Peng Chen (P)

National Engineering Research Center of Industrial Enzymes, Tianjin Institute of Industrial Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Tianjin, China.
National Center of Technology Innovation for Synthetic Biology, Tianjin, China.

Zhuoyue Fu (Z)

National Engineering Research Center of Industrial Enzymes, Tianjin Institute of Industrial Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Tianjin, China.
National Center of Technology Innovation for Synthetic Biology, Tianjin, China.

Yan Zeng (Y)

National Engineering Research Center of Industrial Enzymes, Tianjin Institute of Industrial Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Tianjin, China.
National Center of Technology Innovation for Synthetic Biology, Tianjin, China.

Qian Wang (Q)

National Engineering Research Center of Industrial Enzymes, Tianjin Institute of Industrial Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Tianjin, China.
National Center of Technology Innovation for Synthetic Biology, Tianjin, China.

Christophe Chipot (C)

Laboratoire International Associé CNRS and University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, LPCT, UMR 7019 Université de Lorraine CNRS, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, USA.
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, USA.

Leila Lo Leggio (LL)

Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Yuanxia Sun (Y)

National Engineering Research Center of Industrial Enzymes, Tianjin Institute of Industrial Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Tianjin, China. sun_yx@tib.cas.cn.
National Center of Technology Innovation for Synthetic Biology, Tianjin, China. sun_yx@tib.cas.cn.

Articles similaires

Photosynthesis Ribulose-Bisphosphate Carboxylase Carbon Dioxide Molecular Dynamics Simulation Cyanobacteria

Two codependent routes lead to high-level MRSA.

Abimbola Feyisara Adedeji-Olulana, Katarzyna Wacnik, Lucia Lafage et al.
1.00
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Penicillin-Binding Proteins Peptidoglycan Bacterial Proteins Anti-Bacterial Agents

Mutational analysis of Phanerochaete chrysosporium´s purine transporter.

Mariana Barraco-Vega, Manuel Sanguinetti, Gabriela da Rosa et al.
1.00
Phanerochaete Fungal Proteins Purines Aspergillus nidulans DNA Mutational Analysis
Protein Processing, Post-Translational Humans Blood Coagulation Fibrin Fibrinogen

Classifications MeSH