The roles of employment status and income in the mental health of informal caregivers in Germany.
Employment
Informal caregiving
Mental health
Net household income
Journal
BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 Oct 2024
14 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
14
05
2024
accepted:
01
10
2024
medline:
14
10
2024
pubmed:
14
10
2024
entrez:
13
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Informal caregivers often experience multiple negative consequences as a result of the informal care they provide. Among other factors, employment status, financial resources, and mental health are related to informal caregiving. This analysis examined the association between informal caregivers' employment status and their mental health, as well as the moderating effect of net household income on this relationship. The research question was addressed with data from the German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP) survey, comprising 3,053 informal caregivers (1,007 male; 2,046 female). Data were obtained through self-reports, and mental health was measured with the Summary Scale Mental Score. Stepwise adjusted multiple linear regression models were used to examine the association between employment status and mental health. The moderating effects were tested with interaction terms. All analyses were also stratified for gender. Informal caregivers with full-time jobs reported better mental health than unemployed or marginally employed caregivers (β = 0.077, p < 0.001). The significant interaction term for full-time (β=-0.066, p = 0.001) and part-time workers (β=-0.066, p = 0.003) indicated a moderating effect of net household income on the association between employment status and mental health. This finding was especially evident in women. Employment appears to be a relevant protective factor for informal caregivers' mental health. However, if informal caregivers are not employed, a low net household income might additionally restrict their mental health. Therefore, welfare policy structures must be created to reduce the negative financial consequences for informal caregivers and enable them to achieve work-life-care balance.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Informal caregivers often experience multiple negative consequences as a result of the informal care they provide. Among other factors, employment status, financial resources, and mental health are related to informal caregiving. This analysis examined the association between informal caregivers' employment status and their mental health, as well as the moderating effect of net household income on this relationship.
METHODS
METHODS
The research question was addressed with data from the German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP) survey, comprising 3,053 informal caregivers (1,007 male; 2,046 female). Data were obtained through self-reports, and mental health was measured with the Summary Scale Mental Score. Stepwise adjusted multiple linear regression models were used to examine the association between employment status and mental health. The moderating effects were tested with interaction terms. All analyses were also stratified for gender.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Informal caregivers with full-time jobs reported better mental health than unemployed or marginally employed caregivers (β = 0.077, p < 0.001). The significant interaction term for full-time (β=-0.066, p = 0.001) and part-time workers (β=-0.066, p = 0.003) indicated a moderating effect of net household income on the association between employment status and mental health. This finding was especially evident in women.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Employment appears to be a relevant protective factor for informal caregivers' mental health. However, if informal caregivers are not employed, a low net household income might additionally restrict their mental health. Therefore, welfare policy structures must be created to reduce the negative financial consequences for informal caregivers and enable them to achieve work-life-care balance.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39396955
doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20252-y
pii: 10.1186/s12889-024-20252-y
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2802Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
OECD. Informal carers. 2017.
Federal Statistical Office. 15. koordinierte Bevölkerungsvorausberechnung für Deutschland [15th coordinated population prognosis for Germany]. 2023.
Lisenkova K, McQuaid RW, Wright RE. Demographic change and labour markets. Twenty-First Century Soc. 2010;5(3):243–59.
doi: 10.1080/17450144.2010.480828
Bührer C, Hagist C. The effect of digitalization on the labor market. The Palgrave Handbook of managing continuous business transformation. 2017:115 – 37.
Vinarski-Peretz H, Halperin D. Informal caregivers along the work–eldercare axis: a comparative analysis of Australia, England, and Israel. Int J Law Policy Family. 2021;35(1):ebaa015.
doi: 10.1093/lawfam/ebaa015
Longacre ML, Valdmanis VG, Handorf EA, Fang CY. Work impact and emotional stress among informal caregivers for older adults. Journals Gerontol Ser B: Psychol Sci Social Sci. 2017;72(3):522–31.
Neubert L, König H-H, Mietzner C, Brettschneider C. Dementia care-giving and employment: a mixed-studies review on a presumed conflict. Ageing Soc. 2021;41(5):1094–125.
doi: 10.1017/S0144686X19001545
Bauer JM, Sousa-Poza A. Impacts of informal caregiving on caregiver employment, health, and family. J Popul Ageing. 2015;8(3):113–45.
doi: 10.1007/s12062-015-9116-0
WHO. Mental Health Atlas 2011. World Health Organization; 2011.
Bidenko K, Bohnet-Joschko S. Vereinbarkeit Von Beruf Und Pflege: Wie Wirkt Sich Erwerbstätigkeit auf die Gesundheit pflegender Angehöriger aus? [Balancing work and caregiving: Impact of Employment on the health of family caregivers]. Gesundheitswesen. 2021;83(02):122–7.
doi: 10.1055/a-1173-8918
pubmed: 32645733
Wang Y-N, Hsu W-C, Yang P-S, Yao G, Chiu Y-C, Chen S-T, et al. Caregiving demands, job demands, and health outcomes for employed family caregivers of older adults with dementia: structural equation modeling. Geriatr Nurs. 2018;39(6):676–82.
doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2018.05.003
pubmed: 29859698
Bom J, Bakx P, Schut F, Van Doorslaer E. The impact of informal caregiving for older adults on the health of various types of caregivers: a systematic review. Gerontologist. 2019;59(5):e629–42.
pubmed: 30395200
Verbakel E, Metzelthin SF, Kempen GI. Caregiving to older adults: determinants of informal caregivers’ subjective well-being and formal and informal support as alleviating conditions. J Gerontol Ser B: Psychol Sci Social Sci. 2018;73(6):1099–111.
Stratmann M, Forsell Y, Möller J, Liang Y. Informal care and the impact on depression and anxiety among Swedish adults: a population-based cohort study. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):1–7.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11246-1
Kumagai N. Distinct impacts of high intensity caregiving on caregivers’ mental health and continuation of caregiving. Health Econ Rev. 2017;7:1–14.
doi: 10.1186/s13561-017-0151-9
Le DD, Ibuka Y. Understanding the effects of informal caregiving on health and well-being: heterogeneity and mechanisms. Soc Sci Med. 2023;317:115630.
doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115630
pubmed: 36580861
Pearse R, Connell R. Gender norms and the economy: insights from social research. Fem Econ. 2016;22(1):30–53.
doi: 10.1080/13545701.2015.1078485
King T, Hewitt B, Crammond B, Sutherland G, Maheen H, Kavanagh A. Reordering gender systems: can COVID-19 lead to improved gender equality and health? Lancet. 2020;396(10244):80–1.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31418-5
pubmed: 32569582
pmcid: 7304958
Cascella Carbó GF, García-Orellán R. Burden and gender inequalities around informal care. Investigacion Y Educ en enfermeria. 2020;38(1).
Boniol M, McIsaac M, Xu L, Wuliji T, Diallo K, Campbell J. Gender equity in the health workforce: analysis of 104 countries. World Health Organization; 2019.
Lacey RE, McMunn A, Webb E. Informal caregiving patterns and trajectories of psychological distress in the UK Household Longitudinal Study. Psychol Med. 2019;49(10):1652–60.
doi: 10.1017/S0033291718002222
pubmed: 30205848
Federal Ministry for Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women and Youth. Who takes care of children, household and the elderly? A dossier on the societal dimension of a private question. 2020.
Federal Statistical Office. Gender Care Gap. Frauen Leisten 43,8% mehr unbezahlte Arbeit als Männer [press release]. 2022 Feb 28.
Lietzmann T, Frodermann C. Gender role attitudes and labour market behaviours: do attitudes contribute to gender differences in employment in Germany? Work. Employ Soc. 2023;37(2):373–93.
doi: 10.1177/09500170211011318
Ervin J, Taouk Y, Alfonzo LF, Peasgood T, King T. Longitudinal association between informal unpaid caregiving and mental health amongst working age adults in high-income OECD countries: A systematic review. EClinicalMedicine. 2022;53:101595.
Zwar L, König H-H, Hajek A. Gender differences in mental health, quality of life, and caregiver burden among informal caregivers during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany: a representative, population-based study. Gerontology. 2023;69(2):149–62.
doi: 10.1159/000523846
pubmed: 35390788
Brown MJ, Cohen SA. Informal caregiving, poor mental health, and subjective cognitive decline: results from a population-based sample. J Gerontol Nurs. 2020;46(12):31–41.
doi: 10.3928/00989134-20201106-04
pubmed: 33232495
pmcid: 8045765
Gérain P, Zech E. Informal caregiver burnout? Development of a theoretical framework to understand the impact of caregiving. Front Psychol. 2019;10:466359.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01748
Fleitas Alfonzo L, Taouk Y, Emerson E, King T. Impact of informal care on the mental health of caregivers during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Public Health. 2023;45(4):e668–76.
doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdad193
Nam I. Financial difficulty effects on depressive symptoms among dementia patient caregivers. Community Ment Health J. 2016;52:1093–7.
doi: 10.1007/s10597-016-0033-3
pubmed: 27289466
Chiao CY, Wu HS, Hsiao CY. Caregiver burden for informal caregivers of patients with dementia: a systematic review. Int Nurs Rev. 2015;62(3):340–50.
doi: 10.1111/inr.12194
pubmed: 26058542
Goetze H, Brähler E, Gansera L, Schnabel A, Köhler N. Exhaustion and overload of family caregivers of palliative cancer patients. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2014;65(2):66–72.
Goebel J, Grabka MM, Liebig S, Kroh M, Richter D, Schröder C, et al. The German socio-economic panel (SOEP). Jahrb Natl Stat. 2019;239(2):345–60.
Kroh M, Kühne S, Siegers R, Belcheva V. SOEP-Core-Documentation of sample sizes and panel attrition (1984 until 2016). SOEP Survey Papers; 2018.
Andersen HH, Mühlbacher A, Nübling M, Schupp J, Wagner GG. Computation of standard values for physical and mental health scale scores using the SOEP version of SF-12v2. J Contextual Economics–Schmollers Jahrbuch. 2007;1:171–82.
Liu Y, Dokos M, Fauth EB, Lee YG, Zarit SH. Financial strain, employment, and role captivity and overload over time among dementia family caregivers. Gerontologist. 2019;59(5):e512–20.
pubmed: 31322654
pmcid: 6857684
Barnett AE. Adult child caregiver health trajectories and the impact of multiple roles over time. Res Aging. 2015;37(3):227–52.
doi: 10.1177/0164027514527834
pubmed: 25651570
Chumbler NR, Pienta AM, Dwyer JW. The depressive symptomatology of parent care among the near elderly: the influence of multiple role commitments. Res Aging. 2004;26(3):330–51.
doi: 10.1177/0164027503262425
Martire LM, Stephens MAP, Atienza AA. The interplay of work and caregiving: relationships between role satisfaction, role involvement, and caregivers’ well-being. Journals Gerontol Ser B: Psychol Sci Social Sci. 1997;52(5):S279–89.
doi: 10.1093/geronb/52B.5.S279
Hollederer A, Wildner M. Subjektive Gesundheit Und Erwerbslosigkeit in Deutschland auf Basis der EU-SILC-Daten Von 2005 bis 2014 [Subjective Health and Unemployment in Germany: Analysis of 2005–2014 EU-SILC Data]. Gesundheitswesen. 2019;81(12):1082–90.
pubmed: 30463099
Mossakowski KN. Social causation and social selection. The Wiley Blackwell encyclopedia of health, illness, behavior, and society. 2014:2154-60.
Eberl A, Lang S, Seebaß K. The impact of informal care and employment on the mental health of the caregiver. Sozialer Fortschritt. 2017;66(1):77–96.
doi: 10.3790/sfo.66.1.77
Ciccarelli N, Van Soest A. Informal caregiving, employment status and work hours of the 50 + population in Europe. De Economist. 2018;166(3):363–96.
doi: 10.1007/s10645-018-9323-1
pubmed: 30996393
pmcid: 6434966
Lüdecke D, Mnich E, Kofahl C. The impact of sociodemographic factors on the utilisation of support services for family caregivers of elderly dependents - results from the German sample of the EUROFAMCARE study. GMS Psycho-Social-Medicine. 2012;9:1–11.
Pinquart M, Sörensen S. Gender differences in caregiver stressors, social resources, and health: an updated meta-analysis. J Gerontol Ser B: Psychol Sci Social Sci. 2006;61(1):33–45.
doi: 10.1093/geronb/61.1.P33
Buffel V, Van de Straat V, Bracke P. Employment status and mental health care use in times of economic contraction: a repeated cross-sectional study in Europe, using a three-level model. Int J Equity Health. 2015;14:1–19.
doi: 10.1186/s12939-015-0153-3
Li AKC, Nowrouzi-Kia B. Relationships between employment status with self-perceived mental and physical health in Canada. AIMS Public Health. 2024;11(1):236.
doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2024012
pubmed: 38617416
pmcid: 11007413