Deciphering the neural responses to a naturalistic persuasive message.
fMRI
functional connectivity
intersubject correlation
persuasion
willingness to pay
Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
ISSN: 1091-6490
Titre abrégé: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7505876
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 Oct 2024
22 Oct 2024
Historique:
medline:
16
10
2024
pubmed:
16
10
2024
entrez:
16
10
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Effective health promotion may benefit from understanding how persuasion emerges. While earlier research has identified brain regions implicated in persuasion, these studies often relied on event-related analyses and frequently simplified persuasive communications. The present study investigates the neural basis of valuation change induced by a persuasive healthy eating call, employing naturalistic stimuli. Fifty healthy participants performed two blocks of a bidding task, in which they had to bid on sugar-containing, sugar-free, and nonedible products during functional MRI. In between the two blocks, they listened to a persuasive healthy eating call that influenced their bidding behavior. Intriguingly, participants who resisted persuasion exhibited increased synchronization of brain activity during listening in several regions, including default mode network structures. Additionally, intersubject functional connectivity among these brain regions was found to be weaker in persuaded individuals. These results emphasize the individualized nature of processing persuasive messages, challenging conventional interpretations of synchronized neural activity. Our findings support the emerging practice of tailoring persuasive messages in health promotion campaigns.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39413130
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2401317121
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2401317121Subventions
Organisme : RF government
ID : 075-15-2022-1037
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests statement:The authors declare no competing interest.