Drain versus no-drain at the donor sites of iliac crest bone graft: a retrospective study.
Blood loss
Close suction drainage
Iliac crest bone graft
Incision complications
Treatment
Journal
Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research
ISSN: 1749-799X
Titre abrégé: J Orthop Surg Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101265112
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 Oct 2024
21 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
20
08
2024
accepted:
05
10
2024
medline:
21
10
2024
pubmed:
21
10
2024
entrez:
20
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Closed suction drainage is typically used in orthopaedic surgery to reduce the occurrence of incision complications. However, whether drainage tubes should be routinely placed in iliac crest bone graft surgeries is still unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of closed suction drainage at iliac crest bone donor site on clinical prognosis. G.Power was used for a prior analysis to estimate the required sample size. 91 patients with tibial plateau fractures who underwent iliac crest harvesting and grafting between January 2019 and January 2022 were enrolled in the study. All surgeries were performed by the same experienced surgeon team. Patients were divided into close suction drainage (CSD) group and no-CSD group according to the use of drainage tube. The demographic and perioperative data of the patients were collected and analyzed. There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics between the two groups except that the CSD group had more people with diabetes. The use of closed suction drainage in patients undergoing iliac crest harvest can significantly reduce the incidence of incision complications without increasing pain level and extending hospital stay. However, the closed suction drainage obviously caused the increase of blood loss. More drainage tubes would cause more drainage fluid to flow out. And drainage tube placement may impose a higher financial burden on patients. The closed suction drainage should not be recommended routinely for iliac crest bone graft patients. Only when the patient is at high risk for infection and without severe blood loss, placing a single drainage tube is recommended. This study was registered at (NCT04807062) and approved by the Ethics Committee of the participating institution (Theoretical No. 2015-003-1).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Closed suction drainage is typically used in orthopaedic surgery to reduce the occurrence of incision complications. However, whether drainage tubes should be routinely placed in iliac crest bone graft surgeries is still unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of closed suction drainage at iliac crest bone donor site on clinical prognosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
METHODS
G.Power was used for a prior analysis to estimate the required sample size. 91 patients with tibial plateau fractures who underwent iliac crest harvesting and grafting between January 2019 and January 2022 were enrolled in the study. All surgeries were performed by the same experienced surgeon team. Patients were divided into close suction drainage (CSD) group and no-CSD group according to the use of drainage tube. The demographic and perioperative data of the patients were collected and analyzed.
RESULTS
RESULTS
There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics between the two groups except that the CSD group had more people with diabetes. The use of closed suction drainage in patients undergoing iliac crest harvest can significantly reduce the incidence of incision complications without increasing pain level and extending hospital stay. However, the closed suction drainage obviously caused the increase of blood loss. More drainage tubes would cause more drainage fluid to flow out. And drainage tube placement may impose a higher financial burden on patients.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The closed suction drainage should not be recommended routinely for iliac crest bone graft patients. Only when the patient is at high risk for infection and without severe blood loss, placing a single drainage tube is recommended.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
This study was registered at (NCT04807062) and approved by the Ethics Committee of the participating institution (Theoretical No. 2015-003-1).
Identifiants
pubmed: 39428517
doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05147-3
pii: 10.1186/s13018-024-05147-3
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04807062']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Comparative Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
675Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Li Z, Chen W, Su Y, Zhang Q, Hou Z, Pan J, et al. The application of closed reduction internal fixation and iliac bone block grafting in the treatment of acute displaced femoral neck fractures. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(9):e75479.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075479
pubmed: 24040414
pmcid: 3769404
Lehr AM, Oner FC, Hoebink EA, Kempen DHR, van Susante JLC, Castelein RM, et al. Patients cannot reliably distinguish the Iliac Crest Bone Graft Donor Site from the Contralateral side after lumbar Spine Fusion: a patient-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019;44(8):527–33.
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002882
pubmed: 30234805
Wang Z, Zhu Y, Deng X, Xin X, Tian S, Fu L, et al. Structural bicortical autologous iliac crest bone graft combined with the tunnel bone tamping method for the depressed Tibial Plateau fractures. Biomed Res Int. 2021;2021:1249734.
pubmed: 34476258
pmcid: 8407991
Almaiman M, Al-Bargi HH, Manson P. Complication of anterior iliac bone graft harvesting in 372 adult patients from may 2006 to may 2011 and a literature review. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2013;6(4):257–66.
doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1357510
pubmed: 24436771
pmcid: 3820742
Sittitavornwong S, Gutta R. Bone graft harvesting from regional sites. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2010;22(3):317–30. v-vi.
doi: 10.1016/j.coms.2010.04.006
pubmed: 20713265
Pirris SM, Nottmeier EW, Kimes S, O’Brien M, Rahmathulla G. A retrospective study of iliac crest bone grafting techniques with allograft reconstruction: do patients even know which iliac crest was harvested? Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;21(4):595–600.
doi: 10.3171/2014.6.SPINE13902
pubmed: 25014500
Oliva F, Migliorini F, Cuozzo F, Torsiello E, Hildebrand F, Maffulli N. Outcomes and complications of the reamer irrigator aspirator versus traditional iliac crest bone graft harvesting: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Traumatol. 2021;22(1):50.
doi: 10.1186/s10195-021-00612-9
pubmed: 34851462
pmcid: 8636545
Parker MJ, Livingstone V, Clifton R, McKee A. Closed suction surgical wound drainage after orthopaedic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;2007(3):Cd001825.
pubmed: 17636687
pmcid: 8408575
Boissonneault AR, Schenker M, Staley C, Roorbach M, Erwood AA, Grabel ZJ, et al. Impact of closed suction drainage after surgical fixation of acetabular fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019;139(7):907–12.
doi: 10.1007/s00402-019-03110-0
pubmed: 30687873
Yang M, Yan C, Niu N, Lu Y, Yue W, Pan L. Analysis of the need for postoperative drainage application for hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Comput Math Methods Med. 2022;2022:2069468.
pubmed: 35251296
pmcid: 8894062
Tjeenk RM, Peeters MP, van den Ende E, Kastelein GW, Breslau PJ. Wound drainage versus non-drainage for proximal femoral fractures. A prospective randomised study. Injury. 2005;36(1):100–4.
pubmed: 15589927
Chang HM, Lu WY, Kuan FC, Su WR, Chen PY, Su PF, et al. Wound drainage after proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) fixation may negatively affect the patients with intertrochanteric fractures: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Injury. 2021;52(3):575–81.
doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.10.033
pubmed: 33059925
Muthu S, Ramakrishnan E, Natarajan KK, Chellamuthu G. Risk-benefit analysis of wound drain usage in spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis with evidence summary. Eur Spine J. 2020;29(9):2111–28.
doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06540-2
pubmed: 32700123
Zhang Q, Liu L, Sun W, Gao F, Zhang Q, Cheng L, et al. Are closed suction drains necessary for primary total knee arthroplasty? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Med (Baltim). 2018;97(30):e11290.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011290
Kim MG, Im CJ, Jung WC, Yoon TR, Park KS. Comparison between simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty with and without drainage: a retrospective cohort study. Med (Baltim). 2022;101(43):e31134.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000031134
Lawal YZ, Ogirima MO, Dahiru IL, Abubakar K, Ajibade A. On the use of drains in orthopedic and trauma. Niger J Clin Pract. 2014;17(3):366–9.
doi: 10.4103/1119-3077.130246
pubmed: 24714019
van Rijckevorsel V, de Jong L, Klem T, Kuijper TM, Roukema GR. Drain versus no drain after hip hemi-arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures; differences in clinical outcomes. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022;48(3):1799–805.
doi: 10.1007/s00068-020-01528-5
pubmed: 33084918
Xu H, Xie J, Lei Y, Huang Q, Huang Z, Pei F. Closed suction drainage following routine primary total joint arthroplasty is associated with a higher transfusion rate and longer postoperative length of stay: a retrospective cohort study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019;14(1):163.
doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1211-0
pubmed: 31142376
pmcid: 6542095
Zhang JZ, Zhao K, Li JY, Meng HY, Zhu YB, Zhang YZ. Prophylactic closed suction drainage is irrelevant to Accelerated Rehabilitation after Open reduction and internal fixation for closed distal femur fractures. Orthop Surg. 2020;12(6):1768–75.
doi: 10.1111/os.12812
pubmed: 33047488
pmcid: 7767690
Cillo JE Jr., Marx RE, Stevens MR. Evaluation of autologous platelet-poor plasma gel as a hemostatic adjunct after posterior iliac crest bone harvest. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65(9):1734–8.
doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.09.008
pubmed: 17719390
Migliorini F, Cuozzo F, Torsiello E, Spiezia F, Oliva F, Maffulli N. Autologous bone grafting in trauma and orthopaedic surgery: an evidence-based narrative review. J Clin Med. 2021;10(19).
Sasso RC, Williams JI, Dimasi N, Meyer PR. Jr. Postoperative drains at the donor sites of iliac-crest bone grafts. A prospective, randomized study of morbidity at the donor site in patients who had a traumatic injury of the spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80(5):631–5.
doi: 10.2106/00004623-199805000-00003
pubmed: 9611023
Copuroğlu C, Ercan S, Ozcan M, Ciftdemir M, Turan FN, Yalniz E. Comparison of autogenous bone graft donor site haemostatic agents used in spinal surgery. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2011;45(5):359–64.
pubmed: 22033001
Jiang J, Li X, Li H, Lv X, Xu Y, Hu Y, et al. Recent progress in nanozymes for the treatment of diabetic wounds. J Mater Chem B. 2023;11(29):6746–61.
doi: 10.1039/D3TB00803G
pubmed: 37350323
Johansson T, Engquist M, Pettersson LG, Lisander B. Blood loss after total hip replacement: a prospective randomized study between wound compression and drainage. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20(8):967–71.
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.02.004
pubmed: 16376249
Helito CP, Bonadio MB, Sobrado MF, Giglio PN, Pécora JR, Camanho GL, et al. Comparison of Floseal
doi: 10.6061/clinics/2019/e1186
Good L, Peterson E, Lisander B. Tranexamic acid decreases external blood loss but not hidden blood loss in total knee replacement. Br J Anaesth. 2003;90(5):596–9.
doi: 10.1093/bja/aeg111
pubmed: 12697586