Ventilator performances for non-invasive ventilation: a bench study.
COPD Exacerbations
Critical Care
Equipment Evaluations
Non invasive ventilation
Journal
BMJ open respiratory research
ISSN: 2052-4439
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open Respir Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101638061
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 Oct 2024
22 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
19
10
2023
accepted:
16
09
2024
medline:
23
10
2024
pubmed:
23
10
2024
entrez:
22
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
A wide range of recent ventilators, dedicated or not, is available for non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in respiratory or intensive care units (ICU). We conducted a bench study to compare their technical performances. Ventilators, including five ICU ventilators with NIV mode on, two dedicated NIV ventilators and one transport ventilator, were evaluated on a test bench for NIV, consisting of a 3D manikin head connected to an ASL 5000 lung model via a non-vented mask. Ventilators were tested according to three simulated lung profiles (normal, obstructive, restrictive), three levels of simulated air leakage (0, 15, 30 L/min), two levels of pressure support (8, 14 cmH The global median Asynchrony Index (AI) was higher with ICU ventilators than with dedicated NIV ventilators (4% (0; 76) vs 0% (0; 15), respectively; p<0.05) and different between all ventilators (p<0.001). The AI was higher with ICU ventilators for the normal and restrictive profiles (p<0.01) and not different between ventilators for the obstructive profile. Auto-triggering represented 43% of all patient-ventilator asynchrony. Triggering delay, cycling delay, inspiratory pressure-time product, pressure rise time and pressure at mask were different between all ventilators (p<0.01). Dedicated NIV ventilators induced a lower pressure-time product than ICU and transport ventilators (p<0.01). There was no difference between ventilators for minute ventilation and peak flow. Despite the integration of NIV algorithms, most recent ICU ventilators appear to be less efficient than dedicated NIV ventilators. Technical performances could change, however, according to the underlying respiratory disease and the level of air leakage.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39438080
pii: 11/1/e002144
doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2023-002144
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Comparative Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: Christian Caillard reports non-financial support from Asten. Christophe Girault reports grants and non-financial support from Fischer & Paykel Healthcare, Resmed Ltd., Loweinstein Medical, Asten, outside the submitted work. Antoine Cuvelier, Maxime Patout, Emeline Fresnel, Fabienne Tamion and Elise Artaud-Macari have nothing to disclose.