Radiographic and complication evaluation of 2 different bioresorbable pins in hallux valgus corrective surgery.

Osteotomies to correct hallux valgus are usually secured using metal implants. Their main disadvantage is the need for a repeat surgery for removal of implanted material. Bioresorbable implants would make it possible to overcome this complication. Few studies analyse the results of using bioresorbable pins. The primary objective of this study is to compare hallux valgus correction radiographic results with the use of two types of bioresorbable pins. The secondary objectives are to screen for possible complications related to the use of these bioresorbable pins. This is a descriptive, retrospective, single-centre study carried out between May 2018 and May 2022 in the orthopaedic surgery department of the Centre Chirurgical Emile Gallé at the CHRU in Nancy (France). The study involved 105 hallux valgus (98 patients) operated on by open double metatarsal and phalangeal osteotomy. Osteotomies were stabilised with resorbable polylactic acid (PLLA) pins (Arthrex® TRIM-IT® drill pin) in 57 cases (53 patients), and with resorbable polylactic acid-polyglycolic acid copolymer (PGLA) pins (Bioretec® ActivaPins®) in 48 cases (45 patients). The efficacy of hallux valgus correction was analysed in terms of changes in preoperative and postoperative radiographic parameters at 1 and 6 months on a weight-bearing foot. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the demographic and radiological parameters of each group. The mean age was 59.7 years (range 25-81 years) in the PLLA group and 56 years (range 23-78 years) in the PGLA group. The mean preoperative HVA was 30° (range 15-63°) in the PLLA group and 30.8° (range 15-57°) in the PGLA group. The mean preoperative IMA was 14.4° (range 7-30°) in the PLLA group and 13.8° (range 7-20°) in the PGLA group. There was a statistically significant correction of hallux valgus in the PLLA (p=5.24 X 10-15 ) and PGLA (p=3.56 X 10-13 ) groups. The mean correction for the hallux valgus angle was 13° in the PLLA group and 12° in the PGLA group. There was no statistically significant difference in hallux valgus correction between the PLLA and PGLA groups, particularly in terms of hallux valgus severity. There was no radiological or clinical complication in the groups related to bioresorbable pins. The use of bioresorbable pins allows effective stabilisation of osteotomies to correct hallux valgus. There was no significant difference in correction between PLLA and PGLA implants, regardless of the severity of the hallux valgus. We did not observe any obvious clinical or radiological complications related to their use. The use of bioresorbable osteosynthesis material in forefoot surgery seems to offer interesting advantages, providing patients with safer and less invasive treatment solutions.