A multicenter study comparing the bacterial reduction on flexible endoscopes without a working channel between UV-C light disinfection versus standard endoscope Washer Disinfection: a randomized controlled trial.


Journal

Antimicrobial resistance and infection control
ISSN: 2047-2994
Titre abrégé: Antimicrob Resist Infect Control
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101585411

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
26 Oct 2024
Historique:
received: 19 04 2024
accepted: 14 10 2024
medline: 27 10 2024
pubmed: 27 10 2024
entrez: 27 10 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To prevent cross-contamination between patients, adequate reprocessing is necessary when using flexible endoscopes (FEs) without a working channel. The current reprocessing process using an Endoscope Washer Disinfector (EWD) is time-consuming. Ultraviolet light group C (UV-C) exposition is an alternative and fast disinfection method and has previously been shown to adequately reduce Colony Forming Units (CFUs) on FEs without a working channel. The objective of this study was to examine whether UV-C light is as effective in reducing CFUs on contaminated FEs without a working channel compared to the EWD. FEs without a working channel were collected in three different Otorhinolaryngology Departments in the Netherlands. After pharyngolaryngoscopy, a manual pre-cleaning with tap water was performed and a culture was collected by rolling the distal 8-10 cm of the FE over an agar plate. Next, the FE was randomly assigned to be disinfected with UV-C light (D60) or the EWD (gold standard). After disinfection, another culture was taken. The primary outcome was microbiological contamination, defined by Colony Forming Units (CFU). 600 FEs without a working channel were randomized. After clinical use and manual pre-cleaning, 239/300 (79.7%) FEs in the UV-C group and 262/300 (87.3%) FEs in the EWD group were contaminated (i.e., > 0 CFU). FEs without culture confirmed contamination were excluded from further analysis. After UV-C light disinfection, 195/239 (81.6%) FEs showed 0 CFUs, compared to 187/262 (71.4%) FEs disinfected with the EWD (p < 0.01). A multivariate logistics regression analysis showed an increased odds of 0 CFUs when using UV-C light (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.19-2.79; p < 0.01), conditional on participating hospitals and types of FE. UV-C light disinfection of FEs without a working channel appears more effective in reducing CFUs compared to the EWD and might be a good alternative disinfection method. Not applicable.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
To prevent cross-contamination between patients, adequate reprocessing is necessary when using flexible endoscopes (FEs) without a working channel. The current reprocessing process using an Endoscope Washer Disinfector (EWD) is time-consuming. Ultraviolet light group C (UV-C) exposition is an alternative and fast disinfection method and has previously been shown to adequately reduce Colony Forming Units (CFUs) on FEs without a working channel. The objective of this study was to examine whether UV-C light is as effective in reducing CFUs on contaminated FEs without a working channel compared to the EWD.
METHODS METHODS
FEs without a working channel were collected in three different Otorhinolaryngology Departments in the Netherlands. After pharyngolaryngoscopy, a manual pre-cleaning with tap water was performed and a culture was collected by rolling the distal 8-10 cm of the FE over an agar plate. Next, the FE was randomly assigned to be disinfected with UV-C light (D60) or the EWD (gold standard). After disinfection, another culture was taken. The primary outcome was microbiological contamination, defined by Colony Forming Units (CFU).
RESULTS RESULTS
600 FEs without a working channel were randomized. After clinical use and manual pre-cleaning, 239/300 (79.7%) FEs in the UV-C group and 262/300 (87.3%) FEs in the EWD group were contaminated (i.e., > 0 CFU). FEs without culture confirmed contamination were excluded from further analysis. After UV-C light disinfection, 195/239 (81.6%) FEs showed 0 CFUs, compared to 187/262 (71.4%) FEs disinfected with the EWD (p < 0.01). A multivariate logistics regression analysis showed an increased odds of 0 CFUs when using UV-C light (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.19-2.79; p < 0.01), conditional on participating hospitals and types of FE.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
UV-C light disinfection of FEs without a working channel appears more effective in reducing CFUs compared to the EWD and might be a good alternative disinfection method.
TRIAL REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
Not applicable.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39462387
doi: 10.1186/s13756-024-01486-2
pii: 10.1186/s13756-024-01486-2
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

128

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Kenters N, Huijskens EG, Meier C, Voss A. Infectious diseases linked to cross-contamination of flexible endoscopes. Endosc Int Open. 2015;3(4):E259–65.
doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1392099 pubmed: 26355428 pmcid: 4554517
Seoane-Vazquez E, Rodriguez-Monguio R. Endoscopy-related infection: relic of the past? Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2008;21(4):362–6.
doi: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e328301396b pubmed: 18594287
Spaulding EH. Disinfection, sterilization and preservation. In: Chemical disinfect of medical and surgical materials; 1968. pp. 517–31.
Veerabadran S, Parkinson IM. Cleaning, disinfection and sterilization of equipment. Anaesth Intensive care Med. 2010;11(11):451–4.
doi: 10.1016/j.mpaic.2010.08.005
Muscarella LF. High-level disinfection or sterilization of endoscopes? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1996;17(3):183–7.
pubmed: 8708362
Muscarella LF. Prevention of disease transmission during flexible laryngoscopy. Am J Infect Control. 2007;35(8):536–44.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2006.09.010 pubmed: 17936146
Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Essential Elements of a Reprocessing Program for Flexible Endoscopes–The Recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC) 2016. https://www.cdc.gov/hicpac/pdf/flexible-endoscope-reprocessing.pdf
Day LW, Muthusamy VR, Collins J, Kushnir VM, Sawhney MS, Thosani NC, Wani S. Multisociety guideline on reprocessing flexible GI endoscopes and accessories. Gastrointest Endosc. 2021;93(1):11–e336.
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.09.048 pubmed: 33353611
Beilenhoff U, Biering H, Blum R, Brljak J, Cimbro M, Dumonceau JM, et al. Reprocessing of flexible endoscopes and endoscopic accessories used in gastrointestinal endoscopy: position Statement of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates (ESGENA) - update 2018. Endoscopy. 2018;50(12):1205–34.
doi: 10.1055/a-0759-1629 pubmed: 30458567
(SFERD) SFEReD. Kwaliteitshandboek flexibele endoscopen 2019.
Rudhart SA, Günther F, Dapper L, Thangavelu K, Geisthoff UW, Stankovic P, et al. UV light-based reprocessing of flexible endoscopes without working channel in Oto-Rhino-Laryngology: an effective method? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021;278(10):4075–80.
doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-06737-1 pubmed: 33713189 pmcid: 8382609
Hart D. Bactericidal ultraviolet radiation in the operating room. Twenty-nine-year study for control of infections. J Am Med Assoc. 1960;172:1019–28.
doi: 10.1001/jama.1960.03020100027006 pubmed: 14400064
Rutala WA, Gergen MF, Weber DJ. Room decontamination with UV radiation. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010;31(10):1025–9.
doi: 10.1086/656244 pubmed: 20804377
Marra AR, Schweizer ML, Edmond MB. No-Touch disinfection methods to decrease multidrug-resistant organism infections: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018;39(1):20–31.
doi: 10.1017/ice.2017.226 pubmed: 29144223
Nerandzic MM, Cadnum JL, Pultz MJ, Donskey CJ. Evaluation of an automated ultraviolet radiation device for decontamination of Clostridium difficile and other healthcare-associated pathogens in hospital rooms. BMC Infect Dis. 2010;10:197.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-10-197 pubmed: 20615229 pmcid: 2910020
Boyce JM, Havill NL, Moore BA. Terminal decontamination of patient rooms using an automated mobile UV light unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011;32(8):737–42.
doi: 10.1086/661222 pubmed: 21768755
Jinadatha C, Villamaria FC, Restrepo MI, Ganachari-Mallappa N, Liao IC, Stock EM, et al. Is the pulsed xenon ultraviolet light no-touch disinfection system effective on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the absence of manual cleaning? Am J Infect Control. 2015;43(8):878–81.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.04.005 pubmed: 26014583
Katara G, Hemvani N, Chitnis S, Chitnis V, Chitnis DS. Surface disinfection by exposure to germicidal UV light. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2008;26(3):241–2.
doi: 10.1016/S0255-0857(21)01870-3 pubmed: 18695322
Halmans Y, Wellenstein DJ, Romijn M, Cremers S, Smit JJ, Hopman J et al. Is ultraviolet light disinfection fit to be the future standard for the disinfection of flexible endoscopes without a working channel? Clin Otolaryngol. 2023.
Technologies US. Instructions for Use.
Rudhart SA, Günther F, Dapper L, Thangavelu K, Gehrt F, Stankovic P, et al. UV light-based decontamination: an effective and fast way for disinfection of endoscopes in otorhinolaryngology? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;277(8):2363–9.
doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-05978-w pubmed: 32358650 pmcid: 7335372
Casini B, Tuvo B, Cristina ML, Spagnolo AM, Totaro M, Baggiani A, Privitera GP. Evaluation of an Ultraviolet C (UVC) light-emitting device for disinfection of high Touch surfaces in Hospital critical areas. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16:19.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph16193572
Infectiepreventie SW, Reiniging. Desinfectie & Sterilisatie: Beleid [ZKH]. In: WIP-richtlijn, editor.; 2011.
Cloutman-Green E, D’Arcy N, Spratt DA, Hartley JC, Klein N. How clean is clean–is a new microbiology standard required? Am J Infect Control. 2014;42(9):1002–3.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2014.04.025 pubmed: 25179334
Duodenoscope Surveillance Sampling. & Culturing. In: Collaboration DoHaHS, editor. 2018.
Kac G, Podglajen I, Si-Mohamed A, Rodi A, Grataloup C, Meyer G. Evaluation of ultraviolet C for disinfection of endocavitary ultrasound transducers persistently contaminated despite probe covers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010;31(2):165–70.
doi: 10.1086/649794 pubmed: 20025531
Chen GQ, Chen YH, Yi L, Yin J, Gao Q, Song JN, et al. Study on a New Ultraviolet sterilizer to the Surface Disinfection of the Ultrasound Probe. Biomed Environ Sci. 2018;31(2):163–7.
pubmed: 29606197
Galvin S, Dolan A, Cahill O, Daniels S, Humphreys H. Microbial monitoring of the hospital environment: why and how? J Hosp Infect. 2012;82(3):143–51.
doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2012.06.015 pubmed: 23022372
Maki DG, Weise CE, Sarafin HW. A semiquantitative culture method for identifying intravenous-catheter-related infection. N Engl J Med. 1977;296(23):1305–9.
doi: 10.1056/NEJM197706092962301 pubmed: 323710
Druce JD, Jardine D, Locarnini SA, Birch CJ. Susceptibility of HIV to inactivation by disinfectants and ultraviolet light. J Hosp Infect. 1995;30(3):167–80.
doi: 10.1016/S0195-6701(95)90312-7 pubmed: 8522773
Yang JH, Wu UI, Tai HM, Sheng WH. Effectiveness of an ultraviolet-C disinfection system for reduction of healthcare-associated pathogens. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2019;52(3):487–93.
doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2017.08.017 pubmed: 28951015
Vo E, Rengasamy S, Xu S, Horvatin M, Zhuang Z. New technique to evaluate decontamination methods for filtering facepiece respirators. Am J Infect Control. 2021;49(4):416–23.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2021.01.017 pubmed: 33524450 pmcid: 9494706
Cobb TC, UV-C Decontamination. NASA, Prions, and future perspectives. Appl Biosaf. 2016;21(2):84–8.
doi: 10.1177/1535676016646217
Wilks SA, Koerfer VV, Prieto JA, Fader M, Keevil CW. Biofilm Development on urinary catheters promotes the appearance of viable but Nonculturable Bacteria. mBio. 2021;12(2).
Highmore CJ, Warner JC, Rothwell SD, Wilks SA, Keevil CW. Viable-but-nonculturable Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella enterica Serovar Thompson Induced by chlorine stress remain infectious. mBio. 2018;9(2).
Mohsin MS, Avdic M, Fitzpatrick K, Lanzarini-Lopes M. UV-C side-emitting optical fiber-based disinfection: a promising approach for infection control in tight channels. Microbiol Spectr. 2024;12(6):e0004024.
doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00040-24 pubmed: 38687120

Auteurs

Yana Halmans (Y)

Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, P/O Box 9101, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. yana.halmans@radboudumc.nl.
Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, P/O Box 9101, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. yana.halmans@radboudumc.nl.

D J Wellenstein (DJ)

Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, P/O Box 9101, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

M Romijn (M)

Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, P/O Box 9101, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

A J M van Bemmel (AJM)

Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, P/O 50000, Enschede, The Netherlands.

H van den Berge (H)

Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Medical Center Leeuwarden, P/O 888, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.

R A Scheeren (RA)

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Spaarne Hospital, P/O 417, Haarlem, The Netherlands.

J S Kalpoe (JS)

Department of Medical Microbiology, Spaarne Hospital, P/O 417, Haarlem, The Netherlands.

R Klont (R)

Department of Medical Microbiology, Medical Spectrum Twente, P/O 50000, Enschede, The Netherlands.

J H van Zeijl (JH)

Department of Medical Microbiology, Medical Center Leeuwarden, P/O 888, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.

H Sikkema (H)

Department of Hopsital Pharmacy, Medical Center Leeuwarden, P/O 888, Leeuwarden, 8901 BR, The Netherlands.

S M Euser (SM)

Department of Epidemiology and Infection Prevention, Regional Public Health Laboratory Kennemerland, Haarlem, The Netherlands.

J Hopman (J)

Department of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, P/O Box 9101, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

R P Takes (RP)

Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, P/O Box 9101, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

G B van den Broek (GB)

Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, P/O Box 9101, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH