Integrative 3D genomics with multi-omics analysis and functional validation of genetic regulatory mechanisms of abdominal fat deposition in chickens.


Journal

Nature communications
ISSN: 2041-1723
Titre abrégé: Nat Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101528555

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
28 Oct 2024
Historique:
received: 23 05 2024
accepted: 18 10 2024
medline: 29 10 2024
pubmed: 29 10 2024
entrez: 29 10 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Chickens are the most abundant agricultural animals globally, with controlling abdominal fat deposition being a key objective in poultry breeding. While GWAS can identify genetic variants associated with abdominal fat deposition, the precise roles and mechanisms of these variants remain largely unclear. Here, we use male chickens from two lines divergently selected for abdominal fat deposition as experimental models. Through the integration of genomic, epigenomic, 3D genomic, and transcriptomic data, we build a comprehensive chromatin 3D regulatory network map to identify the genetic regulatory mechanisms that influence abdominal fat deposition in chickens. Notably, we find that the rs734209466 variant functions as an allele-specific enhancer, remotely enhancing the transcription of IGFBP2 and IGFBP5 by the binding transcription factor IRF4. This interaction influences the differentiation and proliferation of preadipocytes, which ultimately affects phenotype. This work presents a detailed genetic regulatory map for chicken abdominal fat deposition, offering molecular targets for selective breeding.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39468045
doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-53692-6
pii: 10.1038/s41467-024-53692-6
doi:

Substances chimiques

Interferon Regulatory Factors 0
interferon regulatory factor-4 0
Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein 2 0
Chromatin 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

9274

Subventions

Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China)
ID : No. 32372868

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Uzundumlu, A. S. & Dilli, M. Estimating chicken meat productions of leader countries for 2019-2025 years. Ciência Rural 53, e20210477 (2022).
doi: 10.1590/0103-8478cr20210477
Chen, C. et al. Estimation of the genetic parameters of traits relevant to feed efficiency: result from broiler lines divergent for high or low abdominal fat content. Poultry Science 100, 461–466 (2021).
pubmed: 33518097 doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.10.028
Baéza, E., Guillier, L. & Petracci, M. Production factors affecting poultry carcass and meat quality attributes. Animal 16, 100331 (2022).
pubmed: 34419417 doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2021.100331
Zhang, X. et al. Genetic selection on abdominal fat content alters the reproductive performance of broilers. Animal 12, 1232–1241 (2018).
pubmed: 29065946 doi: 10.1017/S1751731117002658
Mellouk, N. et al. Chicken Is a Useful Model to Investigate the Role of Adipokines in Metabolic and Reproductive Diseases. International Journal of Endocrinology 2018, 4579734 (2018).
pubmed: 30018639 pmcid: 6029501 doi: 10.1155/2018/4579734
Ji, B. et al. Dynamic regulation of adipose tissue metabolism in the domestic broiler chicken – an alternative model for studies of human obesity. BMC Proceedings 6, P67 (2012).
pmcid: 3374267 doi: 10.1186/1753-6561-6-S3-P67
Dupont, J., Tesseraud, S. & Simon, J. Insulin signaling in chicken liver and muscle. General and Comparative Endocrinology 163, 52–57 (2009).
pubmed: 18996126 doi: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2008.10.016
Dhurandhar, N. V., Kulkarni, P. R., Ajinkya, S. M., Sherikar, A. A. & Atkinson, R. L. Association of adenovirus infection with human obesity. Obesity Research 5, 464–469 (1997).
pubmed: 9385623 doi: 10.1002/j.1550-8528.1997.tb00672.x
Nadaf, J. et al. QTL for several metabolic traits map to loci controlling growth and body composition in an F2 intercross between high-and low-growth chicken lines. Physiological Genomics 38, 241–249 (2009).
pubmed: 19531576 doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.90384.2008
Chua, E. H. Z., Yasar, S. & Harmston, N. The importance of considering regulatory domains in genome-wide analyses–the nearest gene is often wrong! Biol. Open 11, bio059091 (2022).
pubmed: 35377406 pmcid: 9002814 doi: 10.1242/bio.059091
Li, J. et al. Enhancer-promoter interaction maps provide insights into skeletal muscle-related traits in pig genome. BMC Biol 20, 136 (2022).
pubmed: 35681201 pmcid: 9185926 doi: 10.1186/s12915-022-01322-2
Teng, J. et al. A compendium of genetic regulatory effects across pig tissues. Nat. Genet. 56, 112–123 (2024).
pubmed: 38177344 pmcid: 10786720 doi: 10.1038/s41588-023-01585-7
Guan, D. et al. The ChickenGTEx pilot analysis: a reference of regulatory variants across 28 chicken tissues. bioRxiv 2023.06. 27.546670 (2023).
Liu, S. et al. A multi-tissue atlas of regulatory variants in cattle. Nat. Genet. 54, 1438–1447 (2022).
pubmed: 35953587 pmcid: 7613894 doi: 10.1038/s41588-022-01153-5
Stikker, B. S., Hendriks, R. W. & Stadhouders, R. Decoding the genetic and epigenetic basis of asthma. Allergy 78, 940–956 (2023).
pubmed: 36727912 doi: 10.1111/all.15666
Jin, L. et al. Dynamic chromatin architecture of the porcine adipose tissues with weight gain and loss. Nat. Commun. 14, 3457 (2023).
pubmed: 37308492 pmcid: 10258790 doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39191-0
Li, D. et al. Dynamic transcriptome and chromatin architecture in granulosa cells during chicken folliculogenesis. Nat. Commun. 13, 131 (2022).
pubmed: 35013308 pmcid: 8748434 doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27800-9
Aneas, I. et al. Asthma-associated genetic variants induce IL33 differential expression through an enhancer-blocking regulatory region. Nature Communications 12, 6115 (2021).
pubmed: 34675193 pmcid: 8531453 doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26347-z
Joslin, A. C. et al. A functional genomics pipeline identifies pleiotropy and cross-tissue effects within obesity-associated GWAS loci. Nature Communications 12, 5253 (2021).
pubmed: 34489471 pmcid: 8421397 doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25614-3
Sobreira, D. R. et al. Extensive pleiotropism and allelic heterogeneity mediate metabolic effects of IRX3 and IRX5. Science 372, 1085–1091 (2021).
pubmed: 34083488 pmcid: 8386003 doi: 10.1126/science.abf1008
Liu, Y. et al. Integration of multi-omics data reveals cis-regulatory variants that are associated with phenotypic differentiation of eastern from western pigs. Genetics Selection Evolution 54, 62 (2022).
doi: 10.1186/s12711-022-00754-2
Dareng, E. O. et al. Integrative multi-omics analyses to identify the genetic and functional mechanisms underlying ovarian cancer risk regions. Am J Hum Genet 111, 1061–1083 (2024).
pubmed: 38723632 doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.04.011
Guo, L. et al. Comparison of adipose tissue cellularity in chicken lines divergently selected for fatness. Poult. Sci. 90, 2024–2034 (2011).
pubmed: 21844269 doi: 10.3382/ps.2010-00863
Hu, Z. L., Park, C. A. & Reecy, J. M. Bringing the animal QTLdb and CorrDB into the future: meeting new challenges and providing updated services. Nucleic Acids Res 50, D956–D961 (2022).
pubmed: 34850103 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab1116
Whyte, W. A. et al. Master transcription factors and mediator establish super-enhancers at key cell identity genes. Cell 153, 307–319 (2013).
pubmed: 23582322 pmcid: 3653129 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.03.035
Zhang, Y. et al. Super-silencer perturbation by EZH2 and REST inhibition leads to large loss of chromatin interactions and reduction in cancer growth. bioRxiv 2023.08. 29.555291 (2023).
Lindsly, S. et al. 4DNvestigator: time series genomic data analysis toolbox. Nucleus 12, 58–64 (2021).
pubmed: 33794739 pmcid: 8049205 doi: 10.1080/19491034.2021.1910437
Heinz, S. et al. Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities. Mol. Cell 38, 576–589 (2010).
pubmed: 20513432 pmcid: 2898526 doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.05.004
Shen, W. K. et al. AnimalTFDB 4.0: a comprehensive animal transcription factor database updated with variation and expression annotations. Nucleic Acids Res 51, D39–D45 (2023).
pubmed: 36268869 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac907
Wu, K. et al. Exploring noncoding variants in genetic diseases: from detection to functional insights. J. Genet. Genom. 51, 111–132 (2024).
doi: 10.1016/j.jgg.2024.01.001
Zhang, Z. et al. The rs1421085 variant within FTO promotes brown fat thermogenesis. Nat. Metab. 5, 1337–1351 (2023).
pubmed: 37460841 doi: 10.1038/s42255-023-00847-2
Ying, P. et al. Genome-wide enhancer-gene regulatory maps link causal variants to target genes underlying human cancer risk. Nat. Commun. 14, 5958 (2023).
pubmed: 37749132 pmcid: 10520073 doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-41690-z
Feng, Y. et al. Integrative functional genomic analyses identify genetic variants influencing skin pigmentation in Africans. Nat. Genet. 56, 258–272 (2024).
pubmed: 38200130 pmcid: 11005318 doi: 10.1038/s41588-023-01626-1
García-Niño, W. R. & Zazueta, C. New insights of Krüppel-like transcription factors in adipogenesis and the role of their regulatory neighbors. Life Sci 265, 118763 (2021).
pubmed: 33189819 doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118763
Fehrenschild, D. et al. TCF/Lef1-mediated control of lipid metabolism regulates skin barrier function. J. Investig. Dermatol. 132, 337–345 (2012).
pubmed: 21938009 doi: 10.1038/jid.2011.301
Chatterjee, R. et al. Suppression of the C/EBP family of transcription factors in adipose tissue causes lipodystrophy. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 46, 175 (2011).
pubmed: 21321096 pmcid: 3159190 doi: 10.1530/JME-10-0172
Shen, H. et al. SOX4 promotes beige adipocyte-mediated adaptive thermogenesis by facilitating PRDM16-PPARγ complex. Theranostics 12, 7699 (2022).
pubmed: 36451857 pmcid: 9706582 doi: 10.7150/thno.77102
Suter, D. M. Transcription factors and DNA play hide and seek. Trends Cell Biol 30, 491–500 (2020).
pubmed: 32413318 doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2020.03.003
Guo, S. et al. Metabolic crosstalk between skeletal muscle cells and liver through IRF4-FSTL1 in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Nat. Commun. 14, 6047 (2023).
pubmed: 37770480 pmcid: 10539336 doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-41832-3
National Research Council. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry: 1994, (National Academies Press, 1994).
Brown, J., Pirrung, M. & McCue, L. A. FQC dashboard: integrates FastQC results into a web-based, interactive, and extensible FASTQ quality control tool. Bioinformatics 33, 3137–3139 (2017).
pubmed: 28605449 pmcid: 5870778 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx373
Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754–1760 (2009).
pubmed: 19451168 pmcid: 2705234 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324
Danecek, P. et al. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. Gigascience 10, giab008 (2021).
pubmed: 33590861 pmcid: 7931819 doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giab008
DePristo, M. A. et al. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat. Genet. 43, 491–498 (2011).
pubmed: 21478889 pmcid: 3083463 doi: 10.1038/ng.806
Van Der Auwera, G. A. et al. From FastQ data to high confidence variant calls: the genome analysis toolkit best practices pipeline. Curr. Protoc. Bioinform. 43, 11.10.1–11.10.33 (2013).
Wang, K., Li, M. & Hakonarson, H. ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res 38, e164 (2010).
pubmed: 20601685 pmcid: 2938201 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq603
Chang, C. C. et al. Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets. Gigascience 4, S13742–015–0047–8 (2015).
Alexander, D. H. & Lange, K. Enhancements to the ADMIXTURE algorithm for individual ancestry estimation. BMC Bioinform 12, 246 (2011).
doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-246
Shringarpure, S. S., Bustamante, C. D., Lange, K. & Alexander, D. H. Efficient analysis of large datasets and sex bias with ADMIXTURE. BMC Bioinform 17, 218 (2016).
doi: 10.1186/s12859-016-1082-x
Zhang, C., Dong, S. S., Xu, J.-Y., He, W. M. & Yang, T. L. PopLDdecay: a fast and effective tool for linkage disequilibrium decay analysis based on variant call format files. Bioinformatics 35, 1786–1788 (2019).
pubmed: 30321304 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty875
Danecek, P. et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 27, 2156–2158 (2011).
pubmed: 21653522 pmcid: 3137218 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr330
Zhou, Z. et al. An intercross population study reveals genes associated with body size and plumage color in ducks. Nat. Commun. 9, 2648 (2018).
pubmed: 30018292 pmcid: 6050300 doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04868-4
Zhao, P. et al. Evidence of evolutionary history and selective sweeps in the genome of Meishan pig reveals its genetic and phenotypic characterization. Gigascience 7, giy058 (2018).
pubmed: 29790964 pmcid: 6007440 doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giy058
Kim, D. S. ATAC-seq data processing. Chromatin Access. Methods Protoc. 2611, 305–323 (2023).
doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-2899-7_17
Quinlan, A. R. & Hall, I. M. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26, 841–842 (2010).
pubmed: 20110278 pmcid: 2832824 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033
Zhang, Y. et al. Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS). Genome Biol 9, R137 (2008).
pubmed: 18798982 pmcid: 2592715 doi: 10.1186/gb-2008-9-9-r137
Chen, Y., Lun, A. T. & Smyth, G. K. From reads to genes to pathways: differential expression analysis of RNA-Seq experiments using Rsubread and the edgeR quasi-likelihood pipeline. F1000Res 5, 1438 (2016).
pubmed: 27508061 pmcid: 4934518
Kern, C. et al. Functional annotations of three domestic animal genomes provide vital resources for comparative and agricultural research. Nat. Commun. 12, 1821 (2021).
pubmed: 33758196 pmcid: 7988148 doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22100-8
Landt, S. G. et al. ChIP-seq guidelines and practices of the ENCODE and modENCODE consortia. Genome Res 22, 1813–1831 (2012).
pubmed: 22955991 pmcid: 3431496 doi: 10.1101/gr.136184.111
Zhao, S. et al. Genome-wide chromatin interaction profiling reveals vital role of super-enhancers and rearrangements in host enhancer contacts during BmNPV infection. Genome Res 33, 1958–1974 (2023).
pubmed: 37871969 pmcid: 10760458 doi: 10.1101/gr.277931.123
Durand, N. C. et al. Juicer provides a one-click system for analyzing loop-resolution Hi-C experiments. Cell Syst 3, 95–98 (2016).
pubmed: 27467249 pmcid: 5846465 doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2016.07.002
Rieber, L. & Mahony, S. miniMDS: 3D structural inference from high-resolution Hi-C data. Bioinformatics 33, i261–i266 (2017).
pubmed: 28882003 pmcid: 5870652 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx271
DeLano, W. L. Pymol: an open-source molecular graphics tool. CCP4 Newsl. Protein Crystallogr. 40, 82–92 (2002).
Dixon, J. R. et al. Chromatin architecture reorganization during stem cell differentiation. Nature 518, 331–336 (2015).
pubmed: 25693564 pmcid: 4515363 doi: 10.1038/nature14222
Wolff, J. et al. Galaxy HiCExplorer: a web server for reproducible Hi-C data analysis, quality control and visualization. Nucleic Acids Res 46, W11–W16 (2018).
pubmed: 29901812 pmcid: 6031062 doi: 10.1093/nar/gky504
Wolff, J., Backofen, R. & Grüning, B. Loop detection using Hi-C data with HiCExplorer. Gigascience 11, giac061 (2022).
pubmed: 35809047 pmcid: 9270730 doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giac061
Liao, Y. et al. The 3D architecture of the pepper genome and its relationship to function and evolution. Nat. Commun. 13, 3479 (2022).
pubmed: 35710823 pmcid: 9203530 doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31112-x
Kim, D., Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nature Methods 12, 357–360 (2015).
pubmed: 25751142 pmcid: 4655817 doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3317
Liao, Y., Smyth, G. K. & Shi, W. FeatureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics 30, 923–930 (2014).
pubmed: 24227677 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt656
Langfelder, P. & Horvath, S. WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinform 9, 559 (2008).
doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-559
Greenwald, W. W. et al. Pgltools: a genomic arithmetic tool suite for manipulation of Hi-C peak and other chromatin interaction data. BMC Bioinformatics 18, 207 (2017).
pubmed: 28388874 pmcid: 5384132 doi: 10.1186/s12859-017-1621-0
Huang, D. W. et al. DAVID bioinformatics resources: expanded annotation database and novel algorithms to better extract biology from large gene lists. Nucleic Acids Res 35, W169–W175 (2007).
pubmed: 17576678 pmcid: 1933169 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm415
Lyu, F. et al. OmicStudio: A composable bioinformatics cloud platform with real‐time feedback that can generate high‐quality graphs for publication. iMeta 2, e85 (2023).
pubmed: 38868333 pmcid: 10989813 doi: 10.1002/imt2.85
Wang, W. et al. Immortalization of chicken preadipocytes by retroviral transduction of chicken TERT and TR. PLoS One 12, e0177348 (2017).
pubmed: 28486516 pmcid: 5423695 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177348
Shen, L. et al. Replication code: Integrative 3D genomics with multi-omics analysis and functional validation of genetic regulatory mechanisms of fat deposition in chickens. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13902538 (2024).

Auteurs

Linyong Shen (L)

College of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, 150030, PR China.
Key Laboratory of Chicken Genetics and Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Harbin, 150030, PR China.
Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Education Department of Heilongjiang Province, Harbin, 150030, PR China.

Xue Bai (X)

College of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, 150030, PR China.
Key Laboratory of Chicken Genetics and Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Harbin, 150030, PR China.
Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Education Department of Heilongjiang Province, Harbin, 150030, PR China.

Liru Zhao (L)

College of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, 150030, PR China.
Key Laboratory of Chicken Genetics and Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Harbin, 150030, PR China.
Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Education Department of Heilongjiang Province, Harbin, 150030, PR China.

Jiamei Zhou (J)

College of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, 150030, PR China.
Key Laboratory of Chicken Genetics and Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Harbin, 150030, PR China.
Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Education Department of Heilongjiang Province, Harbin, 150030, PR China.

Cheng Chang (C)

College of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, 150030, PR China.
Key Laboratory of Chicken Genetics and Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Harbin, 150030, PR China.
Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Education Department of Heilongjiang Province, Harbin, 150030, PR China.

Xinquan Li (X)

College of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, 150030, PR China.
Key Laboratory of Chicken Genetics and Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Harbin, 150030, PR China.
Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Education Department of Heilongjiang Province, Harbin, 150030, PR China.

Zhiping Cao (Z)

College of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, 150030, PR China.
Key Laboratory of Chicken Genetics and Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Harbin, 150030, PR China.
Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Education Department of Heilongjiang Province, Harbin, 150030, PR China.

Yumao Li (Y)

College of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, 150030, PR China.
Key Laboratory of Chicken Genetics and Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Harbin, 150030, PR China.
Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Education Department of Heilongjiang Province, Harbin, 150030, PR China.

Peng Luan (P)

College of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, 150030, PR China.
Key Laboratory of Chicken Genetics and Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Harbin, 150030, PR China.
Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Education Department of Heilongjiang Province, Harbin, 150030, PR China.

Hui Li (H)

College of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, 150030, PR China. lihui@neau.edu.cn.
Key Laboratory of Chicken Genetics and Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Harbin, 150030, PR China. lihui@neau.edu.cn.
Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Education Department of Heilongjiang Province, Harbin, 150030, PR China. lihui@neau.edu.cn.

Hui Zhang (H)

College of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, 150030, PR China. huizhang@neau.edu.cn.
Key Laboratory of Chicken Genetics and Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Harbin, 150030, PR China. huizhang@neau.edu.cn.
Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Education Department of Heilongjiang Province, Harbin, 150030, PR China. huizhang@neau.edu.cn.

Articles similaires

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male
Humans Meals Time Factors Female Adult

Classifications MeSH