Production and characterization of bacterial cellulose synthesized by Enterobacter chuandaensis strain AEC using Phoenix dactylifera and Musa acuminata.
Enterobacter chuandaensis
Bacterial cellulose
Cytotoxicity assay
NMR analysis
Whole genome sequencing
Journal
Archives of microbiology
ISSN: 1432-072X
Titre abrégé: Arch Microbiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0410427
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 Oct 2024
29 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
09
08
2024
accepted:
23
10
2024
revised:
14
10
2024
medline:
29
10
2024
pubmed:
29
10
2024
entrez:
29
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Bacterial cellulose (BC) is a biopolymer synthesized extracellularly by certain bacteria through the polymerization of glucose monomers. This study aimed to produce BC using Enterobacter chuandaensis with fruit extracts from Phoenix dactylifera (D) and Musa acuminata (M) as carbon sources. Attenuated Total Reflectance-Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR) showed characteristic cellulose vibrations, while X-ray diffraction (XRD) identified distinct peaks at 15.34°, 19.98°, 22.58°, and 34.6°, confirming the cellulose structure. Whole-genome sequencing of E. chuandaensis identified key genes involved in BC production. The BC produced then exhibited a molecular weight of 1,857,804 g/mol, with yields of 2.8 g/L and 2.5 g/L for treatments D and M, respectively. The crystallinity index of the purified BC was 74.1, and
Identifiants
pubmed: 39470811
doi: 10.1007/s00203-024-04182-2
pii: 10.1007/s00203-024-04182-2
doi:
Substances chimiques
Cellulose
9004-34-6
Plant Extracts
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
447Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Abidi W, ´anchez LT-S, Siroy A, Krasteva PV (2022) Weaving of bacterial cellulose by the bcs secretion. FEMS Microbiol Rev 46:fuab051. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsre/fuab051
doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuab051
pubmed: 34634120
Ali-Shtayeh, Ghdeib SIA, Key (1999) Antifungal activity of plant extracts against dermatophytes. Mycoses 42:665–672. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0507.1999.00499.x
doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0507.1999.00499.x
pubmed: 10680445
Almihyawi RAH, Musazade E, Alhussany N et al (2024) Production and characterization of bacterial cellulose by Rhizobium sp. isolated from bean root. Sci Rep 14:10848. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-61619-w
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61619-w
pubmed: 38740945
pmcid: 11091063
Assirey EAR (2015) Nutritional composition of fruit of 10 date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) cultivars grown in Saudi Arabia. J Taibah Univ Sci 9:75–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtusci.2014.07.002
doi: 10.1016/j.jtusci.2014.07.002
Aswini K, Gopal NO, Uthandi S (2020) Optimized culture conditions for bacterial cellulose production by Acetobacter senegalensis MA1. BMC Biotechnol 20:1–16
doi: 10.1186/s12896-020-00639-6
Atalla RH, VanderHart DL (1999) The role of solid state 13 C NMR spectroscopy in studies of the nature of native celluloses. Solid State Nucl Magn Reson 15:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-2040(99)00042-9
doi: 10.1016/S0926-2040(99)00042-9
pubmed: 10903080
Azeredo HMC, Barud H, Farinas CS (2019) Bacterial Cellulose as a Raw Material for Food and Food Packaging Applications. Front Sustain Food Syst 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2019.00007
Bodea IM, Beteg FI, Pop CR et al (2021) Optimization of Moist and Oven-Dried Bacterial Cellulose Production for Functional Properties. Polym (Basel) 132088. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13132088
Bryszewska MA, Tabandeh E, Jędrasik J et al (2023) Celulosa SCOBY modificada con polvo de manzana: biomaterial con características funcionales. Int J Mol Sci 24
Bu D, Hu X, Yang Z et al (2019) Elucidation of the relationship between intrinsic viscosity and molecular weight of cellulose dissolved in tetra-n-butyl ammonium hydroxide/dimethyl sulfoxide. Polym (Basel) 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11101605
Chandrasekaran PT, Bari NK, Sinha S (2017) Enhanced bacterial cellulose production from Gluconobacter xylinus using super optimal broth. Cellulose 24:4367–4381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1419-2
doi: 10.1007/s10570-017-1419-2
Choi CN, Song HJ, Kim MJ et al (2009) Properties of bacterial cellulose produced in a pilot-scale spherical type bubble column bioreactor. korean J Chem Eng 26:136–140
doi: 10.1007/s11814-009-0021-1
Ciecholewska-ju D, Zywicka A, Junka A et al (2021) Superabsorbent crosslinked bacterial cellulose biomaterials for chronic wound dressings. Carbohydr Polym 253:117247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117247
doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117247
Costa AFS, Almeida FCG, Vinhas GM, Sarubbo LA (2017) Production of Bacterial Cellulose by Gluconacetobacter hansenii Using Corn Steep Liquor As Nutrient Sources. Front Microbiol 8:1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.02027
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02027
Dechojarassri D, Okada T, Tamura H, Furuike T (2023) Evaluation of Cytotoxicity of Hyaluronic Acid/Chitosan/Bacterial Cellulose-Based Membrane. Mater (Basel) 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16145189
Dhar P, Etula J, Bankar SB (2019) In Situ Bioprocessing of Bacterial Cellulose with Graphene: Percolation Network Formation, Kinetic Analysis with Physicochemical and Structural Properties Assessment. ACS Appl Bio Mater 2:4052–4066. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.9b00581
doi: 10.1021/acsabm.9b00581
pubmed: 35021339
Digel I, Akimbekov N, Rogachev E, Pogorelova N (2023) Bacterial cellulose produced by Medusomyces gisevii on glucose and sucrose: biosynthesis and structural properties. Cellulose 30:11439–11453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-023-05592-z
doi: 10.1007/s10570-023-05592-z
Distler T, Huemer K, Leitner V et al (2023) Production of bacterial cellulose by Komagataeibacter intermedius from spent sulfite liquor. Bioresour Technol Rep 24:101655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2023.101655
doi: 10.1016/j.biteb.2023.101655
Dressing W (2015) Development of Chitosan/Bacterial Cellulose Composite Films Containing Nanodiamonds as a Potential Flexible Platform for Wound Dressing. Mater (Basel) 8:6401–6418. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma8095309
doi: 10.3390/ma8095309
Elbehiry A, Al Shoaibi M, Alzahrani H et al (2024) Enterobacter cloacae from urinary tract infections: frequency, protein analysis, and antimicrobial resistance. AMB Express 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-024-01675-7
Fadel G, Luiz C, Rita M et al (2017) Bacterial cellulose in biomedical applications: A review. Int J Biol Macromol 104:97–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.05.171
doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.05.171
Foston MB, Hubbell CA, Ragauskas AJ (2011) Cellulose Isolation Methodology for NMR Analysis of Cellulose Ultrastructure. Mater (Basel) 4:1985–2002. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma4111985
doi: 10.3390/ma4111985
Gao G, Liao Z, Cao Y et al (2021) Highly efficient production of bacterial cellulose from corn stover total hydrolysate by Enterobacter sp. FY-07. Bioresour Technol 341:125781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125781
doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125781
pubmed: 34454235
Gelaw LY, Bitew AA, Gashey EM, Ademe MN (2022) Ceftriaxone resistance among patients at GAMBY teaching general hospital. Sci Rep 12:12000. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-16132-3
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16132-3
pubmed: 35835837
pmcid: 9283585
Ghasemi M, Turnbull T, Sebastian S, Kempson I (2021) The mtt assay: Utility, limitations, pitfalls, and interpretation in bulk and single-cell analysis. Int J Mol Sci 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222312827
Gorgieva S, Jančič U, Cepec E, Trček J (2023) Production efficiency and properties of bacterial cellulose membranes in a novel grape pomace hydrolysate by Komagataeibacter melomenusus AV436T and Komagataeibacter xylinus LMG 1518. Int J Biol Macromol 244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.125368
Gromovykh TI, Pigaleva MA, Gallyamov MO et al (2020) Structural organization of bacterial cellulose: The origin of anisotropy and layered structures. Carbohydr Polym 237:116140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116140
doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116140
pubmed: 32241418
Hasanin MS, Abdelraof M, Hashem AH, El Saied H (2023) Sustainable bacterial cellulose production by Achromobacter using mango peel waste. Microb Cell Fact 22:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-023-02031-3
doi: 10.1186/s12934-023-02031-3
Hassan Z, Mustafa S, Rahim RA, Isa NM (2016) Identification, characterisation and phylogenetic analysis of commensal bacteria isolated from human breast milk in Malaysia. Pertanika J Sci Technol 24:351–370
Hess JF, Kohl TA, Kotrová M et al (2020) Library preparation for next generation sequencing: A review of automation strategies. Biotechnol Adv 41:107537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2020.107537
doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2020.107537
pubmed: 32199980
Hodiamont CJ, van den Broek AK, de Vroom SL et al (2022) Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Gentamicin in Various Patient Populations and Consequences for Optimal Dosing for Gram-Negative Infections: An Updated Review. Clin Pharmacokinet 61:1075–1094. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-022-01143-0
doi: 10.1007/s40262-022-01143-0
pubmed: 35754071
pmcid: 9349143
Homthong M, Kubera A, Srihuttagum M, Hongtrakul V (2016) Isolation and characterization of chitinase from soil fungi, Paecilomyces sp. Agric Nat Resour 50:232–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anres.2015.09.005
doi: 10.1016/j.anres.2015.09.005
Hudzicki J (2009) Kirby-Bauer Disk Diffusion Susceptibility Test Protocol. Am Soc Microbiol 1–13
Hungund BS, Gupta SG (2010) Production of bacterial cellulose from Enterobacter amnigenus GH-1 isolated from rotten apple. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 26:1823–1828. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-010-0363-1
doi: 10.1007/s11274-010-0363-1
Id AB, Id BT, Raj M et al (2023) Assessment of four in vitro phenotypic biofilm detection methods in relation to antimicrobial resistance in aerobic clinical bacterial isolates. PLoS ONE 18:e0294646. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294646
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294646
Imai T, Sun S, Horikawa Y et al (2014) Functional Reconstitution of Cellulose Synthase in Escherichia coli. Biomacromolecules 15:4206–4213. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm501217g
doi: 10.1021/bm501217g
pubmed: 25285473
Iwase T, Tajima A, Sugimoto S et al (2013) A simple assay for measuring catalase activity: A visual approach. Sci Rep 3:3–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep03081
doi: 10.1038/srep03081
Jacek P, Dourado F, Gama M, Bielecki S (2019) Molecular aspects of bacterial nanocellulose biosynthesis. Microb Biotechnol 12:633–649. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13386
doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.13386
pubmed: 30883026
pmcid: 6559022
Ji K, Wang W, Zeng B et al (2016) Bacterial cellulose synthesis mechanism of facultative anaerobe Enterobacter sp. FY-07. Sci Rep 6:21863. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep21863
doi: 10.1038/srep21863
pubmed: 26911736
pmcid: 4766428
José R, Elza G, Ida I, Aparecida W (2023) Bacterial cellulose production by Komagataeibacter hansenii can be improved by successive batch culture. Brazilian J Microbiol 54:703–713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42770-023-00910-w
doi: 10.1007/s42770-023-00910-w
Jozala AF, Pértile RAN, dos Santos CA et al (2014) Bacterial cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter xylinus by employing alternative culture media. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99:1181–1190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-014-6232-3
doi: 10.1007/s00253-014-6232-3
pubmed: 25472434
Kačuráková M, Smith AC, Gidley MJ, Wilson RH (2002) Molecular interactions in bacterial cellulose composites studied by 1D FT-IR and dynamic 2D FT-IR spectroscopy. Carbohydr Res 337:1145–1153. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6215(02)00102-7
doi: 10.1016/S0008-6215(02)00102-7
pubmed: 12062530
Khan H, Kadam A, Dutt D (2020) Studies on bacterial cellulose produced by a novel strain of Lactobacillus genus. Carbohydr Polym 229:115513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115513
doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115513
pubmed: 31826477
King AWT, Ma V, Kedzior SA et al (2018) Liquid-State NMR Analysis of Nanocelluloses. Biomacromolecules 19:2708 – 2720 Article. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.8b00295
Kovacs (1956) Identification of E.coli by the oxidase reaction. Nature 703:178
Kuballa T, Kaltenbach KH, Teipel J, Lachenmeier DW (2023) Liquid Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Spectroscopy in Transition — From Structure Elucidation to Multi-Analysis Method. Separation 10:572
doi: 10.3390/separations10110572
Lischer HEL, Shimizu KK (2017) Reference-guided de novo assembly approach improves genome reconstruction for related species. BMC Bioinformatics 18:474. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-017-1911-6
doi: 10.1186/s12859-017-1911-6
pubmed: 29126390
pmcid: 5681816
Lu T, Gao H, Liao B et al (2020) Characterization and optimization of production of bacterial cellulose from strain CGMCC 17276 based on whole-genome analysis. Carbohydr Polym 232:115788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115788
doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115788
pubmed: 31952596
Matsunami RK, Angelides K, Engler DA (2015) Development and Validation of a Rapid 13 C 6 -Glucose Isotope Dilution UPLC-MRM Mass Spectrometry Method for Use in Determining System Accuracy and Performance of Blood Glucose Monitoring Devices. J Diabetes Sci Technol 9:1051–1060. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296815586015
doi: 10.1177/1932296815586015
pubmed: 25986627
pmcid: 4667352
McNamara JT, Morgan JLW, Zimmer J (2015) A molecular description of cellulose biosynthesis. Annu Rev Biochem 84:895–921. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biochem-060614-033930
doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060614-033930
pubmed: 26034894
pmcid: 4710354
Meza-Contreras JC, Manriquez-Gonzalez R, Gutiérrez-Ortega JA, Gonzalez-Garcia Y (2018) XRD and solid state 13 C-NMR evaluation of the crystallinity enhancement of 13 C-labeled bacterial cellulose biosynthesized by Komagataeibacter xylinus under different stimuli: A comparative strategy of analyses. Carbohydr Res 461:51–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carres.2018.03.005
doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2018.03.005
pubmed: 29587136
Mishra S, Singh PK, Pattnaik R et al (2022) Biochemistry, Synthesis, and Applications of Bacterial Cellulose: A Review. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 10:1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.780409
doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.780409
Morgan JLW, Mcnamara JT, Zimmer J, Physics B (2014) Mechanism of activation of bacterial cellulose synthase by cyclic-di-GMP. Nat Struct Mol Biol 21:489–496. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2803
doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2803
pubmed: 24704788
pmcid: 4013215
NCCLS (National Committee for Laboratory Standards) (2002) Performance standard for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; twelfth informational supplement M100-S12. NCCLS, Wayne, PA, USA
Nezhad NG, Rahman RNZRA, Normi YM et al (2023) Isolation, screening and molecular characterization of phytase-producing microorganisms to discover the novel phytase. Biol (Bratisl). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11756-023-01391-w
doi: 10.1007/s11756-023-01391-w
Omadjela O, Narahari A, Strumillo J et al (2013) BcsA and BcsB form the catalytically active core of bacterial cellulose synthase sufficient for in vitro cellulose synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1314063110
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1314063110
Öz YE, Bingül ND, Morçimen ZG et al (2024) Fabrication of porous bone scaffolds using degradable and mouldable bacterial cellulose. Cellulose 31:2921–2935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-024-05771-6
doi: 10.1007/s10570-024-05771-6
Popović NT, Kepec S, Kazazić SP et al (2022) Identification of environmental aquatic bacteria by mass spectrometry supported by biochemical differentiation. PLoS ONE 17:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269423
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269423
Rajaratanam DD, Ariffin H, Hassan MA et al (2018) In vitro cytotoxicity of superheated steam hydrolyzed oligo((R)-3-hydroxybutyrate-co
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199742
Ramirez MS, Tolmasky ME (2017) Amikacin: Uses, resistance, and prospects for inhibition. Molecules 22:2267. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22122267
doi: 10.3390/molecules22122267
pubmed: 29257114
pmcid: 5889950
Ratiu IA, Al-suod H, Ligor M et al (2019) Simultaneous Determination of Cyclitols and Sugars Following a Comprehensive Investigation of 40 Plants. 12:1466–1478
Rezvanian M, Mohd Amin MCI, Ng SF (2016) Development and physicochemical characterization of alginate composite film loaded with simvastatin as a potential wound dressing. Carbohydr Polym 137:295–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.10.091
doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.10.091
pubmed: 26686133
Rosa SML, Rehman N, De Miranda MIG et al (2012) Chlorine-free extraction of cellulose from rice husk and whisker isolation. Carbohydr Polym 87:1131–1138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.08.084
doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.08.084
Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The Neighbor-joining Method: A New Method for Reconstructing Phylogenetic Trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454
doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454
pubmed: 3447015
Saleh AK, Gendi H, El, Fakharany EM, El et al (2022) Exploitation of cantaloupe peels for bacterial cellulose production and functionalization with green synthesized Copper oxide nanoparticles for diverse biological applications. Sci Rep 12:19241. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23952-w
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-23952-w
pubmed: 36357532
pmcid: 9649720
Saleh AK, Salama A, Gendi H, El (2023) Paper sludge saccharification for batch and fed–batch production of bacterial cellulose decorated with magnetite for dye decolorization by experimental design. Cellulose 30:10841–10866. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-023-05545-6
doi: 10.1007/s10570-023-05545-6
Saxena IM, Lin FC, Brown RM (1990) Cloning and sequencing of the cellulose synthase catalytic subunit gene of Acetobacter xylinum. Plant Mol Biol 15:673–683. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00016118
doi: 10.1007/BF00016118
pubmed: 2151718
Saxena IM, Kudlicka K, Okuda K, Brown RM (1994) Characterization of Genes in the Cellulose-Synthesizing Operon (acs Operon) of Acetobacter xylinum: Implications for Cellulose Crystallization. J Bacteriol 176:5735–5752
doi: 10.1128/jb.176.18.5735-5752.1994
pubmed: 8083166
pmcid: 196778
Shezad O, Khan S, Khan T, Park JK (2010) Physicochemical and mechanical characterization of bacterial cellulose produced with an excellent productivity in static conditions using a simple fed-batch cultivation strategy. Carbohydr Polym 82:173–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.04.052
doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.04.052
Singh SA, Vellapandian C (2023) The promising guide to LC–MS analysis and cholinesterase activity of Luffa cylindrica (L.) fruit using in vitro and in-silico analyses. Futur J Pharm Sci. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43094-023-00478-0
doi: 10.1186/s43094-023-00478-0
Souza EF, Furtado MR, Carvalho CWP, Gottshalk LMF (2019) Production and characterization of Gluconacetobacter xylinus bacterial cellulose using cashew apple juice and soybean molasses. Int J Biol Macromol 146:285–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.12.180
doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.12.180
pubmed: 31883899
Sun XF, Sun RC, Su Y, Sun JX (2004) Comparative Study of Crude and Purified Cellulose from Wheat Straw. J Agric Food Chem 52:839–847. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0349230
doi: 10.1021/jf0349230
pubmed: 14969539
Syed S, Rahman A, Vaishnavi T et al (2021) Production of bacterial cellulose using Gluconacetobacter kombuchae immobilized on Luffa aegyptiaca support. Sci Rep 11:2912. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82596-4
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82596-4
Thongwai N, Futui W, Ladpala N et al (2022) Characterization of Bacterial Cellulose Produced by Komagataeibacter maltaceti P285 Isolated from Contaminated Honey Wine. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10030528 . Microorganisms 10:
Tischler AH, Vanek ME, Peterson N, Visick KL (2021) Calcium-Responsive Diguanylate Cyclase CasA Drives Cellulose- Dependent Biofilm Formation and Inhibits Motility in Vibrio fischeri. Am Soc Microbiol 12:1–18
Tomé LC, Pinto RJB, Trovatti E et al (2011) Transparent bionanocomposites with improved properties prepared from acetylated bacterial cellulose and poly(lactic acid) through a simple approach. Green Chem 13:419–427. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0gc00545b
doi: 10.1039/c0gc00545b
Trovatti E, Serafim LS, Freire CSR et al (2011) Gluconacetobacter sacchari: An efficient bacterial cellulose cell-factory. Carbohydr Polym 86:1417–1420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.06.046
doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.06.046
Tsouko E, Kourmentza C, Ladakis D et al (2015) Bacterial cellulose production from industrial waste and by-product streams. Int J Mol Sci 16:14832–14849. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms160714832
doi: 10.3390/ijms160714832
pubmed: 26140376
pmcid: 4519874
Tyagi N, Suresh S (2016) Production of cellulose from sugarcane molasses using Gluconacetobacter intermedius SNT-1: optimization & characterization. J Clean Prod 112:71–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.054
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.054
Volova TG, Prudnikova SV, Sukovatyi AG, Shishatskaya EI (2018) Production and properties of bacterial cellulose by the strain Komagataeibacter xylinus B-12068. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 102:7417–7428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-018-9198-8
doi: 10.1007/s00253-018-9198-8
pubmed: 29982923
Wong HC, Fear AL, Calhoont RD et al (1990) Genetic organization of the cellulose synthase operon in Acetobacter xylinum. Proc Natl Acad Sci 87:8130–8134. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.20.8130
doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.20.8130
pubmed: 2146681
pmcid: 54906
Wu W, Wei L, Feng Y et al (2019) Enterobacter huaxiensis sp. nov. and Enterobacter chuandaensis sp. nov., recovered from human blood. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 69:708–714. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.003207
doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.003207
pubmed: 30614784
Yadav S, Dubey SK (2018) Cellulose degradation potential of Paenibacillus lautus strain BHU3 and its whole genome sequence. Bioresour Technol 262:124–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.04.067
doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.04.067
pubmed: 29702421
Zhang Y, Chen Y, Cao G et al (2021) Bacterial cellulose production from terylene ammonia hydrolysate by Taonella mepensis WT-6. Int J Biol Macromol 166:251–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.10.172
doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.10.172
pubmed: 33122073