A student trained convolutional neural network competing with a commercial AI software and experts in organ at risk segmentation.
Humans
Neural Networks, Computer
Prostatic Neoplasms
/ radiotherapy
Male
Organs at Risk
Retrospective Studies
Software
Artificial Intelligence
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted
/ methods
Urinary Bladder
/ diagnostic imaging
Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography
Rectum
/ diagnostic imaging
Artificial intelligence
Auto segmentation
Convolutional neural network
Prostate cancer
Radiation treatment planning
Turing test
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 10 2024
29 10 2024
Historique:
received:
11
05
2024
accepted:
11
10
2024
medline:
30
10
2024
pubmed:
30
10
2024
entrez:
30
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This retrospective, multi-centered study aimed to improve high-quality radiation treatment (RT) planning workflows by training and testing a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) to perform auto segmentations of organs at risk (OAR) for prostate cancer (PCa) patients, specifically the bladder and rectum. The objective of this project was to develop a clinically applicable and robust artificial intelligence (AI) system to assist radiation oncologists in OAR segmentation. The CNN was trained using manual contours in CT-datasets from diagnostic
Identifiants
pubmed: 39472608
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76288-y
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-76288-y
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
25929Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
R. F. Thompson et al., Artificial intelligence in radiation oncology: A specialty-wide disruptive transformation? https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2018.05.030 (2018).
Vandewinckele, L. et al. Overview of Artificial Intelligence-Based Applications in Radiotherapy: Recommendations for Implementation and Quality Assurance (Elsevier Ireland Ltd., 2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2020.09.008 .
doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.09.008
Zabel, W. J. et al. Clinical evaluation of deep learning and atlas-based auto-contouring of bladder and rectum for prostate radiation therapy. Pract. Radiat. Oncol. 11, 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prro.2020.05.013 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2020.05.013
D’Aviero, A. et al. Clinical validation of a deep-learning segmentation software in head and neck: An early analysis in a developing radiation oncology center. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 19, 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159057 (2022).
doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159057
Isensee, F., Jaeger, P. F., Kohl, S. A. A., Petersen, J. & Maier-Hein, K. H. nnU-Net: A self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation. Nat. Methods 18(2), 203–211. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-020-01008-z (2021).
doi: 10.1038/s41592-020-01008-z
pubmed: 33288961
Wasserthal, J. et al. Total segmentator: Robust segmentation of 104 anatomic structures in CT images. Radiol. Artif. Intell. 5, 5. https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.230024 (2023).
doi: 10.1148/ryai.230024
Salembier, C. et al. ESTRO ACROP consensus guideline on CT- and MRI-based target volume delineation for primary radiation therapy of localized prostate cancer. Radiother. Oncol. 127, 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2018.01.014 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.01.014
Kikinis, R., Pieper, S. D. & Vosburgh, K. G. ‘3D slicer: A platform for subject-specific image analysis, visualization, and clinical support. In Intraoperative Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy (Springer, 2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7657-3_19
Sherer, M. V. et al. Metrics to evaluate the performance of auto-segmentation for radiation treatment planning: A critical review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2021.05.003 (2021).
Gooding, M. J. et al. Comparative evaluation of autocontouring in clinical practice: A practical method using the Turing test. Med. Phys. 45, 11. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.13200 (2018).
doi: 10.1002/mp.13200
Ouyang, H. et al. Evaluation of deep learning-based automated detection of primary spine tumors on MRI using the Turing test. Front. Oncol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.814667 (2022).
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.814667
pubmed: 36713571
pmcid: 9810385
Harrison, K. et al. Machine learning for auto-segmentation in radiotherapy planning. Clin. Oncol. 34, 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2021.12.003 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.12.003
Fu, Y. et al. Artificial intelligence in radiation therapy. IEEE Trans. Radiat. Plasma Med. Sci. 6, 2. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRPMS.2021.3107454 (2022).
doi: 10.1109/TRPMS.2021.3107454
Fu, Y. et al. Pelvic multi-organ segmentation on cone-beam CT for prostate adaptive radiotherapy. Med. Phys. 47, 8. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.14196 (2020).
doi: 10.1002/mp.14196
Savenije, M. H. F. et al. Clinical implementation of MRI-based organs-at-risk auto-segmentation with convolutional networks for prostate radiotherapy. Radiat. Oncol. 15, 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01528-0 (2020).
doi: 10.1186/s13014-020-01528-0
Nachbar, M. et al. Automatic AI-based contouring of prostate MRI for online adaptive radiotherapy. Z. Med. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.05.001 (2023).
doi: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.05.001
pubmed: 37263911
pmcid: 11156783
Künzel, L. A. et al. Clinical evaluation of autonomous, unsupervised planning integrated in MR-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Radiother. Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2022.01.036 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.01.036
pubmed: 35134447
Gooding, M. et al. PV-0531: Multi-centre evaluation of atlas-based and deep learning contouring using a modified Turing test. Radiother. Oncol. 127, S282–S283. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-8140(18)30841-7 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/s0167-8140(18)30841-7
Lorenzen, E. L. et al. An open-source nnU-net algorithm for automatic segmentation of MRI scans in the male pelvis for adaptive radiotherapy. Front Oncol 13, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1285725 (2023).
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1285725
Rhee, D. J. et al. Automatic contouring system for cervical cancer using convolutional neural networks. Med. Phys. 47, 11. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.14467 (2020).
doi: 10.1002/mp.14467
Sartor, H. et al. Auto-segmentations by convolutional neural network in cervical and anorectal cancer with clinical structure sets as the ground truth. Clin. Transl. Radiat. Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2020.09.004 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2020.09.004
pubmed: 33005756
pmcid: 7519211
Trägårdh, E. et al. RECOMIA—A cloud-based platform for artificial intelligence research in nuclear medicine and radiology. EJNMMI Phys. 7, 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-020-00316-9 (2020).
doi: 10.1186/s40658-020-00316-9
Hoeschen, C. & Jungnickel, K. 54. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Medizinische Physik in Magdeburg. Hrgs. Christoph Hoeschen, Kerstin Jungnickel (2023). https://dgmp-kongress.de/fileadmin/media/dgmp/pdf/DGMP2023_Abstractband_online.pdf
Hoque, S. M. H. et al. Clinical use of a commercial artificial intelligence-based software for autocontouring in radiation therapy: Geometric performance and dosimetric impact. Cancers (Basel) 15, 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15245735 (2023).
doi: 10.3390/cancers15245735
Radici, L. et al. Implementation of a commercial deep learning-based auto segmentation software in radiotherapy: Evaluation of effectiveness and impact on workflow. Life 12, 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12122088 (2022).
doi: 10.3390/life12122088
Samarasinghe, G. et al. Deep learning for segmentation in radiation therapy planning: A review. https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.13286 (2021).
Feng, Z., Nie, D., Wang, L. & Shen, D. Semi-supervised learning for pelvic MR image segmentation based on multi-task residual fully convolutional networks. Proc. Int. Sympos. Biomed. Imaging https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBI.2018.8363713 (2018).
doi: 10.1109/ISBI.2018.8363713
Liu, C. et al. Automatic segmentation of the prostate on CT images using deep neural networks (DNN). Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 104, 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.03.017 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.03.017