Exploring the association between phase angle of bioimpedance at 50 kHz and cardiovascular risk.
Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
Cardiovascular Disease
Cardiovascular Risk Calculator
Phase Angle
Journal
BMC cardiovascular disorders
ISSN: 1471-2261
Titre abrégé: BMC Cardiovasc Disord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968539
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 Oct 2024
29 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
10
04
2024
accepted:
19
09
2024
medline:
30
10
2024
pubmed:
30
10
2024
entrez:
30
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Cardiovascular diseases are characterized by chronic inflammation, leading to increased inflammatory markers that can cause cell damage and death. Phase angle has emerged as a marker of cellular health. It is considered a prognostic factor in various acute and chronic conditions. However, few studies have examined its association with cardiovascular disease risk measures. This study aims to investigate the relationship between phase angle, the general Framingham risk score, and the HEARTS cardiovascular risk score. This cross-sectional study included a convenience sample of adult patients of 2 primary health care services. Phase angle was measured using multifrequency bioimpedance analysis at 50 kHz. The risk of cardiovascular events was calculated using the Framingham and HEARTS risk scores. Statistical analysis included generalized linear regression models, unadjusted and adjusted according to sex and age, to determine the association between scores, risk factors, and phase angle. The study included 164 individuals with a mean age 52.2 (SD 17.9). According to the HEARTS score, low-risk patients had higher phase angle values than those with high or very high risk [ß = -0.57 (95% CI -0.95; -0.19), P = 0.003]. Framingham scores showed a trend toward significance for higher mean phase angle values in low-risk than high-risk patients [ß = -0.43 (95% CI -0.88 to 0.02), P = 0.06]. Phase angle values were lower in high and very high-risk patients than in low-risk patients, which shows that phase angle is a promising risk predictor for patients with cardiovascular diseases.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Cardiovascular diseases are characterized by chronic inflammation, leading to increased inflammatory markers that can cause cell damage and death. Phase angle has emerged as a marker of cellular health. It is considered a prognostic factor in various acute and chronic conditions. However, few studies have examined its association with cardiovascular disease risk measures. This study aims to investigate the relationship between phase angle, the general Framingham risk score, and the HEARTS cardiovascular risk score.
METHODS
METHODS
This cross-sectional study included a convenience sample of adult patients of 2 primary health care services. Phase angle was measured using multifrequency bioimpedance analysis at 50 kHz. The risk of cardiovascular events was calculated using the Framingham and HEARTS risk scores. Statistical analysis included generalized linear regression models, unadjusted and adjusted according to sex and age, to determine the association between scores, risk factors, and phase angle.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The study included 164 individuals with a mean age 52.2 (SD 17.9). According to the HEARTS score, low-risk patients had higher phase angle values than those with high or very high risk [ß = -0.57 (95% CI -0.95; -0.19), P = 0.003]. Framingham scores showed a trend toward significance for higher mean phase angle values in low-risk than high-risk patients [ß = -0.43 (95% CI -0.88 to 0.02), P = 0.06].
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Phase angle values were lower in high and very high-risk patients than in low-risk patients, which shows that phase angle is a promising risk predictor for patients with cardiovascular diseases.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39472787
doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-04211-4
pii: 10.1186/s12872-024-04211-4
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
606Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Vos T, Lim SS, Abbafati C et al. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396(10258):1204–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30925-9
Word Health Organization W. Cardiovascular Diseases, Geneva WHO. 2021. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases-(cvds ). Cited 2022 Mar 1
Khambhati J, Allard-Ratick M, Dhindsa D et al. The art of cardiovascular risk assessment. Clin Cardiol. 2018;41(5):677–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.22930
Wong ND. Epidemiological studies of CHD and the evolution of preventive cardiology. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014;11(5):276–89. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2014.26
D’Agostino RB, Vasan RS, Pencina MJ et al. General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the framingham heart study. Circulation. 2008;117(6):743–53. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.107.699579
Ordunez P, Tajer C, Gaziano T et al. The HEARTS app: a clinical tool for cardiovascular risk and hypertension management in primary health care. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2022;46:1–6. https://doi.org/10.26633/rpsp.2022.12
Elosua R. Cardiovascular Risk Functions: Usefulness and Limitations. Rev Española Cardiol (English Ed). 2014;67(2):77–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rec.2013.09.012
Scicchitano P, Ciccone MM, Passantino A et al. Congestion and nutrition as determinants of bioelectrical phase angle in heart failure. Hear Lung. 2020;49(6):724–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2020.07.007
Langer RD, Larsen SC, Ward LC et al. Phase angle measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis and the risk of cardiovascular disease among adult Danes. Nutrition. 2021;89:111280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2021.111280
Arab A, Karimi E, Vingrys K et al. Is phase angle a valuable prognostic tool in cancer patients’ survival? A systematic review and meta-analysis of available literature. Clin Nutr. 2021;40(5):3182–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2021.01.027
Tabinor M, Elphick E, Dudson M et al. Bioimpedance-defined overhydration predicts survival in end stage kidney failure (ESKF): Systematic review and subgroup meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21226-y
Massari F, Iacoviello M, Scicchitano P et al. Accuracy of bioimpedance vector analysis and brain natriuretic peptide in detection of peripheral edema in acute and chronic heart failure. Hear Lung J Acute Crit Care. 2016;45(4):319–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2016.03.008
Peres WAF, Lento DF, Baluz K et al. Phase angle as a nutritional evaluation tool in all stages of chronic liver disease. Nutr Hosp. 2012;27(6):2072–8. https://doi.org/10.3305/nh.2012.27.6.6015
Maddocks M, Kon SSC, Jones SE et al. Bioelectrical impedance phase angle relates to function, disease severity and prognosis in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clin Nutr. 2015;6–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2014.12.020
de Borba EL, Ceolin J, Ziegelmann PK et al. Phase angle of bioimpedance at 50 kHz is associated with cardiovascular diseases: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2022;76(10):1366–73. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-022-01131-4
Popiolek-Kalisz J, Szczygiel K. Bioelectrical impedance analysis and body composition in cardiovascular diseases. Curr Prob Cardiol. 2023;48:101911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2023.101911
Wang H, Jing Z. Inflammation and cardiovascular diseases. Chronic Dis Transl Med. 2020;6(4):215–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cdtm.2020.09.003
Martins PC, Alves Junior CAS, Silva AM et al. Phase angle and body composition: A scoping review. Clinical Nutrition ESPEN. 2023;56:237–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2023.05.015
Saad MAN, Jorge AJL, de Andrade Martins W et al. Phase angle measured by electrical bioimpedance and global cardiovascular risk in older adults. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2018;18(5):732–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.13241
Portugal MRC, Canella DS, Curioni CC et al. Bioelectrical impedance analysis–derived phase angle is related to risk scores of a first cardiovascular event in adults. Nutrition. 2020;78:110865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2020.110865
Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(4):344–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008
Ling CHY, de Craen AJM, Slagboom PE et al. Accuracy of direct segmental multi-frequency bioimpedance analysis in the assessment of total body and segmental body composition in middle-aged adult population. Clin Nutr. 2011;30(5):610–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2011.04.001
Bosaeus M, Karlsson T, Holmäng A et al. Accuracy of quantitative magnetic resonance and eight-electrode bioelectrical impedance analysis in normal weight and obese women. Clin Nutr. 2014;33(3):471–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2013.06.017
Chen KT, Chen YY, Wang CW et al. Comparison of standing posture bioelectrical impedance analysis with DXA for body composition in a large, healthy chinese population. Handelsman DJ, editor. PLoS One. 2016;11(7):e0160105. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160105
Goff DC, Lloyd-Jones DM, Bennett G et al. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk: A report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(25 PART B):2935–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.005
Piepoli MF, Hoes AW, Agewall S et al. 2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice:: The Sixth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts)Developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR). Eur Heart J. 2016;37(29):2315–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw106
Matias CN, Campa F, Nunes CL et al. Phase angle is a marker of muscle quantity and strength in overweight/obese former athletes. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(12):6649. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126649
Hirose S, Nakajima T, Nozawa N et al. Phase angle as an indicator of sarcopenia, malnutrition, and cachexia in inpatients with cardiovascular diseases. J Clin Med. 2020;9(8):2554. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082554
Harada H, Ikeda H, Nishiyama Y et al. Increased arterial velocity pulse index is an independent factor related to skeletal muscle mass reduction and tissue damage in patients with cardiovascular disease. Hypertens Res. 2020;43(6):534–42. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-020-0404-6
Arbel Y, Mass R, Ziv-Baran T et al. Prognostic implications of fluid balance in ST elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Eur Hear J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2017;6(5):462–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/2048872616652312
Ceolin J, de Borba EL, Mundstock E et al. Phase angle of bioimpedance as a marker of inflammation in cardiovascular diseases: a systematic review. Nutrition. 2023;112:112064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2023.112064
Buscemi S, Blunda G, Maneri R et al. Bioelectrical characteristics of type 1 and type 2 diabetic subjects with reference to body water compartments. Acta Diabetol. 1998;35(4):220–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s005920050135
Choi HN, Kim KA, Kim YS et al. Independent association of phase angle with fasting blood glucose and hemoglobin a1c in korean type 2 diabetes patients. Clin Nutr Res. 2020;9(3):205. https://doi.org/10.7762/cnr.2020.9.3.205
Portugal MRC, Brito FB, Curioni CC et al. Smoking status affects bioimpedance-derived phase angle in men but not in women: The Pró-Saúde Study, Brazil. Nutrition. 2019;61:70–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2018.10.029
Jun MH, Kim S, Ku B et al. Glucose-independent segmental phase angles from multi-frequency bioimpedance analysis to discriminate diabetes mellitus. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):648. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-18913-7
Dittmar M, Reber H, Kahaly GJ. Bioimpedance phase angle indicates catabolism in Type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2015;32(9):1177–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.12710
Longo GZ, Silva DAS, Gabiatti MP et al. Phase angle association with metabolic profile in adults: a population-based study. Nutrition. 2021;90:111233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2021.111233
Vona R, Gambardella L, Cittadini C et al. Biomarkers of oxidative stress in metabolic syndrome and associated diseases. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2019:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8267234
Chatterjee S. Oxidative Stress, Inflammation, and Disease. In: Oxidative Stress and Biomaterials. Elsevier; 2016. pp. 35–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803269-5.00002-4
Wilson WFP. Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk assessment for primary prevention in adults: Our approach. 2022. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/atherosclerotic-cardiovascular-disease-risk-assessment-for-primary-prevention-in-adults . Cited 2022 Jul 15