Collaborative work processes in establishing a MiniMaria treatment center for youth substance addiction: a qualitative inquiry of county council healthcare and municipal efforts.
Addiction medicine
Adolescent health services
Four flows model
Group processes
Health care
Inter-organizational collaboration
Organizational behavior
Organizational studies
Social work
Communicative constitution of organizations
Journal
BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 Oct 2024
30 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
02
03
2024
accepted:
22
10
2024
medline:
30
10
2024
pubmed:
30
10
2024
entrez:
30
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This article is part of a larger study exploring the collaborative dynamics between key stakeholders in providing care to youths suffering from alcohol or substance use and their families in formulating policies and operational practices for county and country-wide application in similar settings. The focus of this article is to describe the collaborative processes between two stakeholders, a municipality, and a county council, in establishing a MiniMaria treatment center. While collaborative efforts between municipalities and county councils in health service provision are often acknowledged, little is known about how communication and decision-making processes between these entities shape the success of such initiatives. This study aims to fill this gap by providing insights into the communicative processes that foster organizational cohesion, agility, and innovation. The guiding research question is: What communicative processes occur between the county council and municipal stakeholders during the planning phase of the MiniMaria treatment center? The municipality and county council were selected based on purposive sampling, owing to the proximity and accessibility of the field. An exploratory and descriptive design, incorporating a participatory research approach, was employed for this qualitative investigation. Two central themes, each underpinned by specific subthemes sum up the essence of our findings. The first theme underscores the collaborative dynamics and shared objectives that have emerged through the project, thus showing the importance of a unified vision and mutual understanding in driving the initiative forward. The second theme points to the practical aspects of implementing the project, including recruitment strategies, and the significance of interpersonal communication. This article sheds light on the establishment of a MiniMaria treatment center through collaboration between a municipality and county council, using the Four Flows Model to interpret communicative processes. Membership negotiation was crucial for defining roles and building a unified team identity, while activity coordination ensured aligned stakeholder efforts. Self-structuring facilitated internal organization and operational clarity, and institutional positioning aligned the initiative with broader healthcare norms, enhancing its credibility and impact. These communicative practices were central to get a grip on inter-organizational complexities, emphasizing communication's constitutive role in organizational development and innovation.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
This article is part of a larger study exploring the collaborative dynamics between key stakeholders in providing care to youths suffering from alcohol or substance use and their families in formulating policies and operational practices for county and country-wide application in similar settings. The focus of this article is to describe the collaborative processes between two stakeholders, a municipality, and a county council, in establishing a MiniMaria treatment center. While collaborative efforts between municipalities and county councils in health service provision are often acknowledged, little is known about how communication and decision-making processes between these entities shape the success of such initiatives. This study aims to fill this gap by providing insights into the communicative processes that foster organizational cohesion, agility, and innovation. The guiding research question is: What communicative processes occur between the county council and municipal stakeholders during the planning phase of the MiniMaria treatment center?
METHODS
METHODS
The municipality and county council were selected based on purposive sampling, owing to the proximity and accessibility of the field. An exploratory and descriptive design, incorporating a participatory research approach, was employed for this qualitative investigation.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Two central themes, each underpinned by specific subthemes sum up the essence of our findings. The first theme underscores the collaborative dynamics and shared objectives that have emerged through the project, thus showing the importance of a unified vision and mutual understanding in driving the initiative forward. The second theme points to the practical aspects of implementing the project, including recruitment strategies, and the significance of interpersonal communication.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This article sheds light on the establishment of a MiniMaria treatment center through collaboration between a municipality and county council, using the Four Flows Model to interpret communicative processes. Membership negotiation was crucial for defining roles and building a unified team identity, while activity coordination ensured aligned stakeholder efforts. Self-structuring facilitated internal organization and operational clarity, and institutional positioning aligned the initiative with broader healthcare norms, enhancing its credibility and impact. These communicative practices were central to get a grip on inter-organizational complexities, emphasizing communication's constitutive role in organizational development and innovation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39472891
doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11820-4
pii: 10.1186/s12913-024-11820-4
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1307Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
J Clin Med. 2022 Dec 12;11(24):
pubmed: 36555987
Eval Health Prof. 2023 Mar;46(1):23-29
pubmed: 36189854
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2021 Feb 27;16(1):20
pubmed: 33639969
Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2018 Feb;35(1):24-38
pubmed: 32934511
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2017 Jan;19(1):5
pubmed: 28120255
Scand J Caring Sci. 2009 Dec;23(4):820-5
pubmed: 19691490
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2020 Jun 24;15(1):43
pubmed: 32580732
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2020 May;112:49-59
pubmed: 32199546
Implement Sci. 2015 Oct 06;10:141
pubmed: 26443999
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2023 Jul;42(5):1195-1219
pubmed: 37015828
Health Soc Work. 2024 Jan 30;49(1):5-6
pubmed: 38061047
Am J Psychiatry. 2019 Feb 1;176(2):98-106
pubmed: 30278790
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Apr 1;197:78-82
pubmed: 30784952
Fam Process. 2023 Mar;62(1):49-73
pubmed: 36564902
Community Ment Health J. 2019 Jan;55(1):24-30
pubmed: 29549545
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 16;19(24):
pubmed: 36554808