A dosimetric and robustness analysis of proton arc therapy with early energy layer and spot assignment for lung cancer versus conventional intensity modulated proton therapy.


Journal

Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)
ISSN: 1651-226X
Titre abrégé: Acta Oncol
Pays: Sweden
ID NLM: 8709065

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
29 Oct 2024
Historique:
received: 10 04 2024
accepted: 03 10 2024
medline: 30 10 2024
pubmed: 30 10 2024
entrez: 30 10 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) faces challenges in lung cancer treatment, like maintaining plan robustness for moving tumors against setup, range errors, and interplay effects. Proton Arc Therapy (PAT) is an alternative to maintain target coverage, potentially improving organ at risk (OAR) sparing, reducing beam delivery time (BDT), and enhancing patient experience. We aim to perform a systematic plan comparison study between IMPT and energy layer (EL) and spot assignment algorithm - Proton Arc Therapy (ELSA-PAT) to assess its potential for lung cancer treatment. A total of 14 Lung ELSA-PAT plans were compared retrospectively with IMPT plans. 4D worst-case minimax robust optimization was performed, including 84 scenarios (3%, 3 mm). Dosimetry assessment included target (clinical tumor volume [CTV]) and important OARs, on nominal and worst-case scenarios. Most relevant normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP), target coverage robustness against interplay effect, and BDT were evaluated. CTV D95% and D98% showed no significant difference in comparison. PAT demonstrated better conformality by 66% (p = 0.00012) but delivered a higher heart mean dose (HMD, 23%). There was a 2% increase in NTCP 2-year mortality risk with PAT. Total BDT was comparable among techniques. IMPT was more robust than PAT against interplay effect, considering both D1% (1.0 ± 0.8 Gy vs 1.1 ± 1.4 Gy) and D98% bandwidths (0.9 ± 0.9 Gy vs 1.1 ± 1.3 Gy). Both techniques provide a similar level of dose coverage to the target volume. Although PAT improved dose conformality, higher HMD translated into increased heart toxicity, presumably due to chosen planning methodology and OAR proximity to target. Increased ELs and spots raised PAT BDT, although it could improve daily treatment workflow.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE OBJECTIVE
Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) faces challenges in lung cancer treatment, like maintaining plan robustness for moving tumors against setup, range errors, and interplay effects. Proton Arc Therapy (PAT) is an alternative to maintain target coverage, potentially improving organ at risk (OAR) sparing, reducing beam delivery time (BDT), and enhancing patient experience. We aim to perform a systematic plan comparison study between IMPT and energy layer (EL) and spot assignment algorithm - Proton Arc Therapy (ELSA-PAT) to assess its potential for lung cancer treatment.
MATERIAL AND METHODS METHODS
A total of 14 Lung ELSA-PAT plans were compared retrospectively with IMPT plans. 4D worst-case minimax robust optimization was performed, including 84 scenarios (3%, 3 mm). Dosimetry assessment included target (clinical tumor volume [CTV]) and important OARs, on nominal and worst-case scenarios. Most relevant normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP), target coverage robustness against interplay effect, and BDT were evaluated.
RESULTS RESULTS
CTV D95% and D98% showed no significant difference in comparison. PAT demonstrated better conformality by 66% (p = 0.00012) but delivered a higher heart mean dose (HMD, 23%). There was a 2% increase in NTCP 2-year mortality risk with PAT. Total BDT was comparable among techniques. IMPT was more robust than PAT against interplay effect, considering both D1% (1.0 ± 0.8 Gy vs 1.1 ± 1.4 Gy) and D98% bandwidths (0.9 ± 0.9 Gy vs 1.1 ± 1.3 Gy).
INTERPRETATION CONCLUSIONS
Both techniques provide a similar level of dose coverage to the target volume. Although PAT improved dose conformality, higher HMD translated into increased heart toxicity, presumably due to chosen planning methodology and OAR proximity to target. Increased ELs and spots raised PAT BDT, although it could improve daily treatment workflow.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39473175
doi: 10.2340/1651-226X.2024.40549
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Comparative Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

805-815

Auteurs

Macarena S Chocan (MS)

Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherche expérimentale et clinique, Molecular Imaging and Radiation Oncology (MIRO) Laboratory, Brussels, Belgium. macarena.chocan@uclouvain.be.

Sophie Wuyckens (S)

Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherche expérimentale et clinique, Molecular Imaging and Radiation Oncology (MIRO) Laboratory, Brussels, Belgium.

Damien Dasnoy (D)

Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTEAM), Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium.

Dario Di Perri (D)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.

Elena Borderias Villarruel (E)

Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherche expérimentale et clinique, Molecular Imaging and Radiation Oncology (MIRO) Laboratory, Brussels, Belgium.

Erik Engwall (E)

RaySearch Laboratories - Research and Development Department, Stockholm, Sweden.

John A Lee (JA)

Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherche expérimentale et clinique, Molecular Imaging and Radiation Oncology (MIRO) Laboratory, Brussels, Belgium.

Ana M Barragan-Montero (AM)

Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherche expérimentale et clinique, Molecular Imaging and Radiation Oncology (MIRO) Laboratory, Brussels, Belgium.

Edmond Sterpin (E)

Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de recherche expérimentale et clinique, Molecular Imaging and Radiation Oncology (MIRO) Laboratory, Brussels, Belgium; KULeuven, Department of Oncology, Laboratory of external radiotherapy, Leuven, Belgium; Particle Therapy Interuniversity Center Leuven - PARTICLE, Leuven, Belgium.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH