Type I MET inhibitors cooperate with PD-1 blockade to promote rejection of hepatocellular carcinoma.
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
/ drug therapy
Liver Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-met
/ metabolism
Animals
Humans
Mice
Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
/ pharmacology
Pyridines
/ pharmacology
Cell Line, Tumor
Benzamides
Imidazoles
Triazines
Combination Therapy
Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor
Immunotherapy
Journal
Journal for immunotherapy of cancer
ISSN: 2051-1426
Titre abrégé: J Immunother Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101620585
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 Oct 2024
30 Oct 2024
Historique:
accepted:
04
10
2024
medline:
31
10
2024
pubmed:
31
10
2024
entrez:
30
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Blockade of the immune checkpoints programmed death-1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic lymphocyte antigen 4 has improved outcomes for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), yet most still fail to achieve objective clinical benefit. MET plays key roles in both HCC tumorigenesis and immunosuppressive conditioning; however, inhibition of MET causes upregulation of PD-ligand 1 (PD-L1) suggesting the use of these inhibitors in the context of PD-1 blockade. We sought to investigate across the Hepa1-6, HCA-1 and diethylnitrosamine (DEN) models of HCC whether the combination of more specific type I versus more pleiotropic type II MET inhibitors would confer superior outcomes in combination with PD-1 blockade. While MET inhibition demonstrated cooperativity with αPD-1 across all three models, the type I MET inhibitor capmatinib showed optimal activity in combination and statistically significantly outperformed the combination with the type II inhibitor cabozantinib in the αPD-1 refractory DEN model. In both HCA-1 and DEN HCC, the capmatinib and αPD-1 combination enhanced CD8 T cell frequency and activation state while limiting intratumoral myeloid immune suppression. In vitro studies of antigen-specific T cell activation reveal significantly less inhibition of effector cytokine production and proliferation by capmatinib versus by type II or type III MET inhibitors. These findings suggest significant potential for clinical HCC combination studies of type I MET inhibitors and PD-1 blockade where prior trials using type II inhibitors have yielded limited benefit.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39477243
pii: jitc-2024-009690
doi: 10.1136/jitc-2024-009690
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-met
EC 2.7.10.1
Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor
0
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
0
Pyridines
0
MET protein, human
EC 2.7.10.1
capmatinib
TY34L4F9OZ
Benzamides
0
Imidazoles
0
Triazines
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: MAC reports grants and personal fees from ImmunoGenesis, personal fees from Alligator Bioscience, ImmunOs, OncoResponse, Kineta, Xencor, Agenus, AstraZeneca outside the submitted work; In addition, MAC has a patent “Dual specificity antibodies which bind both PD-L1 and PD-L2 and prevent their binding to PD-1” with royalties paid by ImmunoGenesis.