Generation of binder-format-payload conjugate-matrices by antibody chain-exchange.


Journal

Nature communications
ISSN: 2041-1723
Titre abrégé: Nat Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101528555

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
31 Oct 2024
Historique:
received: 24 06 2024
accepted: 21 10 2024
medline: 31 10 2024
pubmed: 31 10 2024
entrez: 31 10 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The generation of antibody-drug conjugates with optimal functionality depends on many parameters. These include binder epitope, antibody format, linker composition, conjugation site(s), drug-to-antibody ratio, and conjugation method. The production of matrices that cover all possible parameters is a major challenge in identifying optimal antibody-drug conjugates. To address this bottleneck, we adapted our Format Chain Exchange technology (FORCE), originally established for bispecific antibodies, toward the generation of binder-format-payload matrices (pair-FORCE). Antibody derivatives with exchange-enabled Fc-heterodimers are combined with payload-conjugated Fc donors, and subsequent chain-exchange transfers payloads to antibody derivatives in different formats. The resulting binder-format-conjugate matrices can be generated with cytotoxic payloads, dyes, haptens, and large molecules, resulting in versatile tools for ADC screening campaigns. We show the relevance of pair-FORCE for identifying optimal HER2-targeting antibody-drug conjugates. Analysis of this matrix reveals that the notion of format-defines-function applies not only to bispecific antibodies, but also to antibody-drug conjugates.

Identifiants

pubmed: 39477939
doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-53730-3
pii: 10.1038/s41467-024-53730-3
doi:

Substances chimiques

Immunoconjugates 0
Antibodies, Bispecific 0
Receptor, ErbB-2 EC 2.7.10.1
ERBB2 protein, human EC 2.7.10.1
Trastuzumab P188ANX8CK
Haptens 0
Epitopes 0
Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

9406

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Dumontet, C., Reichert, J. M., Senter, P. D., Lambert, J. M. & Beck, A. Antibody-drug conjugates come of age in oncology. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 22, 641–661 (2023).
pubmed: 37308581 doi: 10.1038/s41573-023-00709-2
Liu, K. et al. A review of the clinical efficacy of FDA-approved antibody‒drug conjugates in human cancers. Mol. Cancer 23, 62 (2024).
pubmed: 38519953 doi: 10.1186/s12943-024-01963-7
Akkapeddi, P. et al. Construction of homogeneous antibody-drug conjugates using site-selective protein chemistry. Chem. Sci. 7, 2954–2963 (2016).
pubmed: 29997785 doi: 10.1039/C6SC00170J
Drago, J. Z., Modi, S. & Chandarlapaty, S. Unlocking the potential of antibody-drug conjugates for cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 18, 327–344 (2021).
pubmed: 33558752 doi: 10.1038/s41571-021-00470-8
Ross, P. L. & Wolfe, J. L. Physical and chemical stability of antibody drug conjugates: current status. J. Pharm. Sci. 105, 391–397 (2016).
pubmed: 26869406 doi: 10.1016/j.xphs.2015.11.037
Hamblett, K. J. et al. Effects of drug loading on the antitumor activity of a monoclonal antibody drug conjugate. Clin. Cancer Res. 10, 7063–7070 (2004).
pubmed: 15501986 doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-0789
Anami, Y. et al. Homogeneity of antibody-drug conjugates critically impacts the therapeutic efficacy in brain tumors. Cell Rep. 39, 110839 (2022).
pubmed: 35613589 doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110839
Riccardi, F., Dal Bo, M., Macor, P. & Toffoli, G. A comprehensive overview on antibody-drug conjugates: from the conceptualization to cancer therapy. Front. Pharm. 14, 1274088 (2023).
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1274088
Beck, A., Goetsch, L., Dumontet, C. & Corvaïa, N. Strategies and challenges for the next generation of antibody–drug conjugates. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 16, 315–337 (2017).
pubmed: 28303026 doi: 10.1038/nrd.2016.268
Sau, S., Alsaab, H. O., Kashaw, S. K., Tatiparti, K. & Iyer, A. K. Advances in antibody-drug conjugates: A new era of targeted cancer therapy. Drug Discov. Today 22, 1547–1556 (2017).
pubmed: 28627385 doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2017.05.011
Fu, Z., Li, S., Han, S., Shi, C. & Zhang, Y. Antibody drug conjugate: the “biological missile” for targeted cancer therapy. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 7, 93 (2022).
pubmed: 35318309 doi: 10.1038/s41392-022-00947-7
Baah, S., Laws, M. & Rahman, K. M. Antibody-drug conjugates-a tutorial review. Molecules 26, 2943 (2021).
Nath, N. et al. Homogeneous plate based antibody internalization assay using pH sensor fluorescent dye. J. Immunol. Methods 431, 11–21 (2016).
pubmed: 26851520 doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2016.02.001
Sadiki, A. et al. Site-specific conjugation of native antibody. Antib. Ther. 3, 271–284 (2020).
pubmed: 33644685
Mejias-Gomez, O. et al. A window into the human immune system: comprehensive characterization of the complexity of antibody complementary-determining regions in functional antibodies. MAbs 15, 2268255 (2023).
pubmed: 37876265 doi: 10.1080/19420862.2023.2268255
Tsuchikama, K., Anami, Y., Ha, S. Y. Y. & Yamazaki, C. M. Exploring the next generation of antibody-drug conjugates. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 21, 203–223 (2024).
pubmed: 38191923 doi: 10.1038/s41571-023-00850-2
Nadkarni, D. V. Conjugations to endogenous cysteine residues. Methods Mol. Biol. 2078, 37–49 (2020).
pubmed: 31643048 doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9929-3_3
Junutula, J. R. et al. Site-specific conjugation of a cytotoxic drug to an antibody improves the therapeutic index. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 925–932 (2008).
pubmed: 18641636 doi: 10.1038/nbt.1480
Pillow, T. H. et al. Site-specific trastuzumab maytansinoid antibody-drug conjugates with improved therapeutic activity through linker and antibody engineering. J. Med. Chem. 57, 7890–7899 (2014).
pubmed: 25191794 doi: 10.1021/jm500552c
Axup, J. Y. et al. Synthesis of site-specific antibody-drug conjugates using unnatural amino acids. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 16101–16106 (2012).
pubmed: 22988081 pmcid: 3479532 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1211023109
Tian, F. et al. A general approach to site-specific antibody drug conjugates. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 1766–1771 (2014).
pubmed: 24443552 pmcid: 3918752 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1321237111
Zimmerman, E. S. et al. Production of site-specific antibody-drug conjugates using optimized non-natural amino acids in a cell-free expression system. Bioconjug. Chem. 25, 351–361 (2014).
pubmed: 24437342 doi: 10.1021/bc400490z
VanBrunt, M. P. et al. Genetically encoded azide containing amino acid in mammalian cells enables site-specific antibody-drug conjugates using click cycloaddition chemistry. Bioconjug. Chem. 26, 2249–2260 (2015).
pubmed: 26332743 doi: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.5b00359
Hussain, A. F. et al. Toward homogenous antibody drug conjugates using enzyme-based conjugation approaches. Pharmaceuticals 14, 343 (2021).
pubmed: 33917962 doi: 10.3390/ph14040343
Möhlmann, S., Bringmann, P., Greven, S. & Harrenga, A. Site-specific modification of ED-B-targeting antibody using intein-fusion technology. BMC Biotechnol. 11, 76 (2011).
pubmed: 21777442 doi: 10.1186/1472-6750-11-76
Steffen, W. et al. Discovery of a microbial transglutaminase enabling highly site-specific labeling of proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 292, 15622–15635 (2017).
pubmed: 28751378 doi: 10.1074/jbc.M117.797811
Schneider, H., Deweid, L., Avrutina, O. & Kolmar, H. Recent progress in transglutaminase-mediated assembly of antibody-drug conjugates. Anal. Biochem. 595, 113615 (2020).
pubmed: 32035039 doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2020.113615
Dennler, P. et al. Transglutaminase-based chemo-enzymatic conjugation approach yields homogeneous antibody-drug conjugates. Bioconjug. Chem. 25, 569–578 (2014).
pubmed: 24483299 doi: 10.1021/bc400574z
Dengl, S. et al. Format chain exchange (FORCE) for high-throughput generation of bispecific antibodies in combinatorial binder-format matrices. Nat. Commun. 11, 4974 (2020).
pubmed: 33009381 doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18477-7
Slaga, D. et al. Avidity-based binding to HER2 results in selective killing of HER2-overexpressing cells by anti-HER2/CD3. Sci. Transl. Med. 10, eaat5775 (2018).
pubmed: 30333240 doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aat5775
Zwaagstra, J. C. et al. Binding and functional profiling of antibody mutants guides selection of optimal candidates as antibody drug conjugates. PLoS ONE 14, e0226593 (2019).
pubmed: 31891584 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226593
Ramos, M. K. et al. Valency of HER2 targeting antibodies influences tumor cell internalization and penetration. Mol. Cancer Ther. 20, 1956–1965 (2021).
pubmed: 34253591 doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-20-1097
Su, D. & Zhang, D. Linker design impacts antibody-drug conjugate pharmacokinetics and efficacy via modulating the stability and payload release efficiency. Front. Pharmacol. 12, 687926 (2021).
pubmed: 34248637 doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.687926
Strop, P. et al. Location matters: site of conjugation modulates stability and pharmacokinetics of antibody drug conjugates. Chem. Biol. 20, 161–167 (2013).
pubmed: 23438745 doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2013.01.010
Kaempffe, A. et al. Effect of conjugation site and technique on the stability and pharmacokinetics of antibody-drug conjugates. J. Pharm. Sci. 110, 3776–3785 (2021).
pubmed: 34363839 doi: 10.1016/j.xphs.2021.08.002
Shen, B. Q. et al. Conjugation site modulates the in vivo stability and therapeutic activity of antibody-drug conjugates. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 184–189 (2012).
pubmed: 22267010 doi: 10.1038/nbt.2108
Sun, X. et al. Effects of drug-antibody ratio on pharmacokinetics, biodistribution, efficacy, and tolerability of antibody-maytansinoid conjugates. Bioconjug. Chem. 28, 1371–1381 (2017).
pubmed: 28388844 doi: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.7b00062
Brinkmann, U. & Kontermann, R. E. The making of bispecific antibodies. MAbs 9, 182–212 (2017).
pubmed: 28071970 doi: 10.1080/19420862.2016.1268307
Dickopf, S., Georges, G. J. & Brinkmann, U. Format and geometries matter: structure-based design defines the functionality of bispecific antibodies. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 18, 1221–1227 (2020).
pubmed: 32542108 doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2020.05.006
Labrijn, A. F., Janmaat, M. L., Reichert, J. M. & Parren, P. Bispecific antibodies: a mechanistic review of the pipeline. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 18, 585–608 (2019).
pubmed: 31175342 doi: 10.1038/s41573-019-0028-1
Kang, M. S., Kong, T. W. S., Khoo, J. Y. X. & Loh, T. P. Recent developments in chemical conjugation strategies targeting native amino acids in proteins and their applications in antibody-drug conjugates. Chem. Sci. 12, 13613–13647 (2021).
pubmed: 34760149 doi: 10.1039/D1SC02973H
Jiang, H., D’Agostino, G. D., Cole, P. A. & Dempsey, D. R. Selective protein N-terminal labeling with N-hydroxysuccinimide esters. Methods Enzymol. 639, 333–353 (2020).
pubmed: 32475408 doi: 10.1016/bs.mie.2020.04.018
Panowski, S., Bhakta, S., Raab, H., Polakis, P. & Junutula, J. R. Site-specific antibody drug conjugates for cancer therapy. MAbs 6, 34–45 (2014).
pubmed: 24423619 doi: 10.4161/mabs.27022
Beckett, D., Kovaleva, E. & Schatz, P. J. A minimal peptide substrate in biotin holoenzyme synthetase-catalyzed biotinylation. Protein Sci. 8, 921–929 (1999).
pubmed: 10211839 doi: 10.1110/ps.8.4.921
Sela, T. et al. Diligent design enables antibody-ASO conjugates with optimal pharmacokinetic properties. Bioconjug. Chem. 34, 2096–2111 (2023).
pubmed: 37916986 doi: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.3c00393
Sletten, E. M. & Bertozzi, C. R. From mechanism to mouse: a tale of two bioorthogonal reactions. Acc. Chem. Res. 44, 666–676 (2011).
pubmed: 21838330 doi: 10.1021/ar200148z
Kim, E. & Koo, H. Biomedical applications of copper-free click chemistry: in vitro, in vivo, and ex vivo. Chem. Sci. 10, 7835–7851 (2019).
pubmed: 31762967 doi: 10.1039/C9SC03368H
Debets, M. F. et al. Aza-dibenzocyclooctynes for fast and efficient enzyme PEGylation via copper-free (3+2) cycloaddition. Chem. Commun. 46, 97–99 (2010).
Kuzmin, A., Poloukhtine, A., Wolfert, M. A. & Popik, V. V. Surface functionalization using catalyst-free azide-alkyne cycloaddition. Bioconjug. Chem. 21, 2076–2085 (2010).
pubmed: 20964340 doi: 10.1021/bc100306u
Boghaert, E. R., Cox, M. C. & Vaidya, K. S. Pathophysiologic and pharmacologic considerations to improve the design and application of antibody-drug conjugates. Cancer Res. 82, 1858–1869 (2022).
pubmed: 35298624 doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-21-3236
Deonarain, M. P., Yahioglu, G., Stamati, I. & Marklew, J. Emerging formats for next-generation antibody drug conjugates. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 10, 463–481 (2015).
pubmed: 25797303 doi: 10.1517/17460441.2015.1025049
Beckley, N. S., Lazzareschi, K. P., Chih, H. W., Sharma, V. K. & Flores, H. L. Investigation into temperature-induced aggregation of an antibody drug conjugate. Bioconjug. Chem. 24, 1674–1683 (2013).
pubmed: 24070051 doi: 10.1021/bc400182x
Yamazaki, C. M. et al. Antibody-drug conjugates with dual payloads for combating breast tumor heterogeneity and drug resistance. Nat. Commun. 12, 3528 (2021).
pubmed: 34112795 doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23793-7
Anami, Y. et al. Enzymatic conjugation using branched linkers for constructing homogeneous antibody-drug conjugates with high potency. Org. Biomol. Chem. 15, 5635–5642 (2017).
pubmed: 28649690 doi: 10.1039/C7OB01027C
Dickopf, S. et al. Prodrug-activating chain exchange (PACE) converts targeted prodrug derivatives to functional bi- or multispecific antibodies. Biol. Chem. 403, 495–508 (2022).
pubmed: 35073465 doi: 10.1515/hsz-2021-0401
Carter, P. et al. Humanization of an anti-p185HER2 antibody for human cancer therapy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 4285–4289 (1992).
pubmed: 1350088 doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.10.4285
Adams, C. W. et al. Humanization of a recombinant monoclonal antibody to produce a therapeutic HER dimerization inhibitor, pertuzumab. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 55, 717–727 (2006).
pubmed: 16151804 doi: 10.1007/s00262-005-0058-x
Goldstein, N. I., Prewett, M., Zuklys, K., Rockwell, P. & Mendelsohn, J. Biological efficacy of a chimeric antibody to the epidermal growth factor receptor in a human tumor xenograft model. Clin. Cancer Res. 1, 1311–1318 (1995).
pubmed: 9815926
Gerdes, C. A. et al. GA201 (RG7160): a novel, humanized, glycoengineered anti-EGFR antibody with enhanced ADCC and superior in vivo efficacy compared with cetuximab. Clin. Cancer Res. 19, 1126–1138 (2013).
pubmed: 23209031 doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-0989
Ridgway, J. B., Presta, L. G. & Carter, P. Knobs-into-holes’ engineering of antibody CH3 domains for heavy chain heterodimerization. Protein Eng. 9, 617–621 (1996).
pubmed: 8844834 doi: 10.1093/protein/9.7.617
Merchant, A. M. et al. An efficient route to human bispecific IgG. Nat. Biotechnol. 16, 677–681 (1998).
pubmed: 9661204 doi: 10.1038/nbt0798-677
Kearns, J. D. et al. Enhanced targeting of the EGFR network with MM-151, an oligoclonal anti-EGFR antibody therapeutic. Mol. Cancer Ther. 14, 1625–1636 (2015).
pubmed: 25911688 doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-14-0772
Johns, T. G. et al. Identification of the epitope for the epidermal growth factor receptor-specific monoclonal antibody 806 reveals that it preferentially recognizes an untethered form of the receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 30375–30384 (2004).
pubmed: 15075331 doi: 10.1074/jbc.M401218200

Auteurs

Vedran Vasic (V)

Roche Pharma Research and Early Development (pRED), Large Molecule Research (LMR), Roche Innovation Center Munich, Penzberg, Germany.

Steffen Dickopf (S)

Roche Pharma Research and Early Development (pRED), Large Molecule Research (LMR), Roche Innovation Center Munich, Penzberg, Germany.
Veraxa Biotech, Heidelberg, Germany.

Nadine Spranger (N)

Roche Pharma Research and Early Development (pRED), Large Molecule Research (LMR), Roche Innovation Center Munich, Penzberg, Germany.
Institute of Molecular Immunology, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.

Rose-Sophie Rosenberger (RS)

Roche Pharma Research and Early Development (pRED), Large Molecule Research (LMR), Roche Innovation Center Munich, Penzberg, Germany.

Michaela Fischer (M)

Roche Pharma Research and Early Development (pRED), Large Molecule Research (LMR), Roche Innovation Center Munich, Penzberg, Germany.

Klaus Mayer (K)

Roche Pharma Research and Early Development (pRED), Large Molecule Research (LMR), Roche Innovation Center Munich, Penzberg, Germany.

Vincent Larraillet (V)

Roche Pharma Research and Early Development (pRED), Large Molecule Research (LMR), Roche Innovation Center Munich, Penzberg, Germany.

Jack A Bates (JA)

Roche Pharma Research and Early Development (pRED), Large Molecule Research (LMR), Roche Innovation Center Munich, Penzberg, Germany.

Verena Maier (V)

Roche Pharma Research and Early Development (pRED), Large Molecule Research (LMR), Roche Innovation Center Munich, Penzberg, Germany.

Tatjana Sela (T)

Roche Pharma Research and Early Development (pRED), Large Molecule Research (LMR), Roche Innovation Center Munich, Penzberg, Germany.

Bianca Nussbaum (B)

Roche Pharma Research and Early Development (pRED), Large Molecule Research (LMR), Roche Innovation Center Munich, Penzberg, Germany.

Harald Duerr (H)

Roche Pharma Research and Early Development (pRED), Large Molecule Research (LMR), Roche Innovation Center Munich, Penzberg, Germany.

Stefan Dengl (S)

Roche Pharma Research and Early Development (pRED), Large Molecule Research (LMR), Roche Innovation Center Munich, Penzberg, Germany.

Ulrich Brinkmann (U)

Roche Pharma Research and Early Development (pRED), Large Molecule Research (LMR), Roche Innovation Center Munich, Penzberg, Germany. ulrich.brinkmann@roche.com.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH