Portuguese translation, cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the temporomandibular joint scale: a cross-sectional study.
Temporomandibular joint Scale
cultural adaptation
reliability
translation
validity
Journal
Oral and maxillofacial surgery
ISSN: 1865-1569
Titre abrégé: Oral Maxillofac Surg
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101319632
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 Oct 2024
31 Oct 2024
Historique:
received:
19
08
2024
accepted:
25
10
2024
medline:
1
11
2024
pubmed:
1
11
2024
entrez:
31
10
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The temporomandibular joint (TMJ) scale assesses the severity of temporomandibular joint disorders (TMD), yet a European Portuguese translation is lacking. To translate, cross-culturally adapt and to examine the psychometric properties (construct validity and reliability) of the TMJ scale. Translation and cultural adaptation were carried out according to international recommendations, including initial translation, evaluation of this translation and cultural adaptation by a panel of experts, and back translation. The final Portuguese version was used to examine the reliability and validity, and participants with TMD were recruited from a Portuguese outpatient clinic. Reliability measures included internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha and test-retest reliability with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2,1). The Spearman correlation comparing the TMJ scale with the Fonseca and Helkimo indexes was used to assess the construct validity. A total of 63 participants (23 ± 2 years; 61,9% female) were included. Similar internal consistency was observed between the two moments of application (0.921 and 0.918), and test-retest reliability was excellent, with an ICC2,1 = 0.998 (95%CI: 0.988-0.999). Robust positive correlations (rho 0.554-0.611, p < 0.001) were found between the TMJ scale and Fonseca and Helkimo indexes. The European Portuguese version of TMJ scale is now available to improve the assessment of severity of TMD in routine clinical practice. This version is also reliable and valid.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The temporomandibular joint (TMJ) scale assesses the severity of temporomandibular joint disorders (TMD), yet a European Portuguese translation is lacking.
OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
To translate, cross-culturally adapt and to examine the psychometric properties (construct validity and reliability) of the TMJ scale.
METHODS
METHODS
Translation and cultural adaptation were carried out according to international recommendations, including initial translation, evaluation of this translation and cultural adaptation by a panel of experts, and back translation. The final Portuguese version was used to examine the reliability and validity, and participants with TMD were recruited from a Portuguese outpatient clinic. Reliability measures included internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha and test-retest reliability with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2,1). The Spearman correlation comparing the TMJ scale with the Fonseca and Helkimo indexes was used to assess the construct validity.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 63 participants (23 ± 2 years; 61,9% female) were included. Similar internal consistency was observed between the two moments of application (0.921 and 0.918), and test-retest reliability was excellent, with an ICC2,1 = 0.998 (95%CI: 0.988-0.999). Robust positive correlations (rho 0.554-0.611, p < 0.001) were found between the TMJ scale and Fonseca and Helkimo indexes.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The European Portuguese version of TMJ scale is now available to improve the assessment of severity of TMD in routine clinical practice. This version is also reliable and valid.
Identifiants
pubmed: 39480529
doi: 10.1007/s10006-024-01300-8
pii: 10.1007/s10006-024-01300-8
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Manfredini D, Segù M, Arveda N et al (2016) <ArticleTitle Language="En">Temporomandibular Joint disorders in patients with different facial morphology. A systematic review of the literature. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 74(1):29–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOMS.2015.07.006
doi: 10.1016/J.JOMS.2015.07.006
pubmed: 26255097
Ryan J, Hassan N, Hilton G, Wickham J, Akhter R, Ibaragi S (2019) Epidemiology of Temporomandibular Disorder in the General Population: a Systematic Review. Adv Dentistry Oral Health 10(3):1–13. https://doi.org/10.19080/ADOH.2019.10.555787
doi: 10.19080/ADOH.2019.10.555787
Lund JP (1991) Mastication and its Control by the Brain Stem. Crit Reviews Oral Biology Med 2(1):33–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/10454411910020010401
doi: 10.1177/10454411910020010401
Standring S (2015) Gray’s Anatomy - The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice, 41st edn. Elsevier
Palla P S (2016) Anatomy and Pathophysiology of the Temporomandibular Joint. Funct Occlusion Restor Dentistry Prosthodont 2016:67–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7234-3809-0.00006-1
American Academy of Orofacial Pain (2018) Orofacial Pain: Guidelines for Assessment, Diagnosis, and Management. 6th ed. (de Leeuw R, Klasser,Gary D., eds.). Quintessence Publishing
Bueno CH, Pereira DD, Pattussi MP, Grossi PK, Grossi ML (2018) Gender differences in temporomandibular disorders in adult populational studies: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Rehabil 45(9):720–729. https://doi.org/10.1111/JOOR.12661
doi: 10.1111/JOOR.12661
pubmed: 29851110
Jennings EA, Williams MC, Staikopoulos V, Ivanusic JJ (2012) Neurobiology of Temporomandibular Joint Pain: Therapeutic Implications. Semin Orthod 18(1):63–72. https://doi.org/10.1053/J.SODO.2011.10.003
doi: 10.1053/J.SODO.2011.10.003
Staniszewski K, Lygre H, Bifulco E et al (2018) Temporomandibular Disorders Related to Stress and HPA-Axis Regulation. Pain Res Manag 2018(1):7020751. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7020751
doi: 10.1155/2018/7020751
pubmed: 29854038
pmcid: 5954859
Scariot R, Corso PFCL, Sebastiani AM, Vieira AR (2018) The many faces of genetic contributions to temporomandibular joint disorder: An updated review. Orthod Craniofac Res 21(4):186–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/OCR.12239
doi: 10.1111/OCR.12239
pubmed: 30204294
Moreno AGUT, Bezerra AGV, Alves-Silva EG et al (2021) Influence of estrogen on pain modulation in temporomandibular disorder and its prevalence in females: an integrative review. Res Soc Dev 10(2):e38510212453–e38510212453. https://doi.org/10.33448/RSD-V10I2.12453
doi: 10.33448/RSD-V10I2.12453
Brown DT, Gaudet EL (1994) Outcome Measurement for Treated and Untreated TMD Patients Using the TMJ Scale. CRANIO
doi: 10.1080/08869634.1994.11678024
pubmed: 7828202
Durham J, Steele J, Moufti MA, Wassell R, Robinson P, Exley C (2011) Temporomandibular disorder patients’ journey through care. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 39(6):532–541. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.2011.00608.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2011.00608.x
pubmed: 21299587
Ohrbach R, Larsson P, List T (2008) The jaw functional limitation scale: development, reliability, and validity of 8-item and 20-item versions. J Orofac Pain 22(3):219–230
pubmed: 18780535
Levitt SR, Lundeen TF, McKinney MW (1988) Initial studies of a new assessment method for temporomandibular joint disorders. J Prosthet Dent 59(4):490–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(88)90048-0
doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(88)90048-0
pubmed: 3162995
Levitt SR, McKinney MW, Lundeen TF (1988) The TMJ Scale: Cross-Validation and Reliability Studies. CRANIO
doi: 10.1080/08869634.1988.11678216
pubmed: 3162835
Lundeen TF, Levitt SR, McKinney MW (1988) Evaluation of temporomandibular joint disorders by clinician ratings. J Prosthet Dent 59(2):202–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(88)90016-9
doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(88)90016-9
pubmed: 3422687
Yamaguchi D, Motegi E, Nomura M et al (2002) Evaluation of Psychological Factors in Orthodontic Patients with TMD as applied to the TMJ Scale. Original Article 83 Bull Tokyo dent Coll 43(2):8387
Beaton D, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz M (2002) Recommendations for the cross-cultural adaptation of health status measures. Am Acad Orthop Surg Revis Published online 2002:1–9
Mokkink Cecilia AC, Prinsen Donald L, Patrick Jordi Alonso Lex M, Bouter LB, Mokkink CL (2024) COSMIN Study Design checklist for Patient-reported outcome measurement instruments. Accessed July 2. https://www.cosmin.nl
Ferreira L, Neves AN, Campana MB, Da M, Gomes C, Fernandes Tavares C (2014) Guia da AAOS/IWH: sugestões para adaptação transcultural de escalas 1. Avaliação Psicológica 13(3):457–461
Pedro AR, Amaral O, Escoval A (2016) Literacia em saúde, dos dados à ação: tradução, validação e aplicação do European Health Literacy Survey em Portugal. Revista Portuguesa de Saúde Pública 34(3):259–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RPSP.2016.07.002
doi: 10.1016/J.RPSP.2016.07.002
Duarte HMS, Sousa PML, Dixe M, dos ACR, Professora R (2017) Validação da versão portuguesa da escala de satisfação dos estudantes de enfermagem relativamente à Simulação de Alta-Fidelidade (ESEE-SAF). Instituto Politécnico de Leiria U de I em SES de S de L, ed. Construindo conhecimento em Enfermagem à pessoa em situação crítica. Published online 2017:185–196. Accessed July 3, 2024. https://iconline.ipleiria.pt/handle/10400.8/2889
da Fonseca DM, Bonfante G, Valle AL, de do, Freitas SFT (1994) Diagnóstico pela anamnese da disfunção craniomandibular. RGO 42(1):23–28
Helkimo M (1974) Studies on function and dysfunction of the masticatory system. II. Index for anamnestic and clinical dysfunction and occlusal state. Sven Tandlak Tidskr 67(2):101–121
pubmed: 4524733
Yap AU, Zhang MJ, Lei J, Fu KY (2024) Accuracy of the Fonseca Anamnestic Index for identifying pain-related and/or intra-articular Temporomandibular Disorders. CRANIO
doi: 10.1080/08869634.2021.1954375
pubmed: 34259594
Alonso-Royo R, Sánchez-Torrelo CM, Ibáñez-Vera AJ et al (2021) Validity and Reliability of the Helkimo Clinical Dysfunction Index for the Diagnosis of Temporomandibular Disorders. Diagnostics 11(3):472. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11030472
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11030472
pubmed: 33800185
pmcid: 8000811
Taber KS (2018) The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Res Sci Educ 48(6):1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
doi: 10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
Akoglu H (2018) User’s guide to correlation coefficients. Turk J Emerg Med 18(3):91–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjem.2018.08.001
doi: 10.1016/j.tjem.2018.08.001
pubmed: 30191186
pmcid: 6107969
Costa LMR da, de Medeiros DL, Ries LGK, Beretta A, de Noronha MA (2014) Assessment of cross-cultural adaptations and measurement properties of self-report outcome measures in Portuguese relevant to temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review. Fisioterapia e Pesquisa 21(2):107–112. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-2950/35421022014
Borges REA, Mendonça L, da Santos Calderon RA P (2024) Diagnostic and screening inventories for temporomandibular disorders: A systematic review. CRANIO
doi: 10.1080/08869634.2021.1954376
pubmed: 34275426
Kumar N, Daigavane P, Jain S, Mantri N (2022) Review of Various Clinical Assessment Indices and Orthodontic Management for Temporomandibular Joint Disorders. Cureus Published online Oct 19. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.30492
Chaves TC, de Oliveira AS, Grossi DB (2008) Principais instrumentos para avaliação da disfunção temporomandibular, parte I: índices e questionários; uma contribuição para a prática clínica e de pesquisa. Fisioterapia e Pesquisa 15(1):92–100. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1809-29502008000100015
doi: 10.1590/S1809-29502008000100015
Nomura K, Vitti M, de Oliveira AS et al (2007) Use of the Fonseca’s questionnaire to assess the prevalence and severity of temporomandibular disorders in brazilian dental undergraduates. Braz Dent J 18(2):163–167. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402007000200015
doi: 10.1590/S0103-64402007000200015
pubmed: 17982559
Topuz MF, Oghan F, Ceyhan A et al (2023) Assessment of the severity of temporomandibular disorders in females: Validity and reliability of the Fonseca anamnestic index. CRANIO
doi: 10.1080/08869634.2020.1814652
pubmed: 32870743
Maroco J, Garcia-Marques T (2006) Qual a fiabilidade do alfa de Cronbach? Questões antigas e soluções modernas? Laboratório de Psicologia 4(1):65–90. https://doi.org/10.14417/lp.763
Chew PKH, Dillon DB, Swinbourne AL (2018) An examination of the internal consistency and structure of the Statistical Anxiety Rating Scale (STARS). PLoS ONE 13(3):e0194195. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0194195
doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0194195
pubmed: 29538400
pmcid: 5851613
Barten JA, Pisters MF, Huisman PA, Takken T, Veenhof C (2012) Measurement properties of patient-specific instruments measuring physical function. J Clin Epidemiol 65(6):590–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.12.005
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.12.005
pubmed: 22459427
Streiner DL, Norman GR (2008) Health Measurement Scales. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199231881.001.0001