Nine prophylactic polishing pastes: impact on discoloration, gloss, and surface properties of a CAD/CAM resin composite.
CAD/CAM resin composite
Discoloration
Prophylactic polishing paste
Surface free energy
Surface gloss
Surface roughness
Journal
Clinical oral investigations
ISSN: 1436-3771
Titre abrégé: Clin Oral Investig
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9707115
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2019
Jan 2019
Historique:
received:
18
12
2017
accepted:
09
04
2018
pubmed:
17
4
2018
medline:
7
6
2019
entrez:
17
4
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To investigate discoloration reduction and changes of surface properties of a CAD/CAM resin composite after 14 days´ storage in red wine and polishing with nine different prophylactic polishing pastes (PPPs). Rectangular discs (N = 172) were fabricated and polished (P4000) using GC Cerasmart (GC Europe) to investigate different polishing protocols with 1-4 related descending PPPs (22 in total): Cleanic/CLE-Kerr, CleanJoy/CLJ-Voco, Clean Polish/Super Polish/SPO-Kerr, Clinpro Prophy Paste/CPP-3M, Détartrine/DET-Septodont, Nupro/NUP-Dentsply Sirona, Prophy Paste CCS/CCS-Directa, Proxyt/PXT-Ivoclar Vivadent, and Zircate/ZIR Prophy Paste-Dentsply Sirona. Surface properties (roughness values (RV)/Ra, Rz, Rv, surface free energy (SFE), surface gloss (G), and discoloration (ΔE)) were analyzed before and after storage and additional polishing. Data were examined using Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, three-way ANOVA followed by Tukey-B post hoc, Mann-Whitney U, and Kruskal-Wallis H tests (α < 0.05). Regarding RV, CLE, followed by CCS, and CPP showed the highest values; the lowest presented SPO and DET (p < 0.001). No impact of PPP was observed on ΔE values (p = 0.160). The lowest SFE presented DET, followed by SPO; highest showed CCS followed by NUP and CPP (p < 0.001). Within G, lowest values were observed for CLE and NUP, followed by CCS, ZIP, and CLJ (p < 0.001); the highest presented SPO (p < 0.001). Polishing showed generally a positive impact on SFE values (p < 0.001-p = 0.007), except ZIP (p = 0.322) and CLE (p = 0.083). G increased and RV decreased after polishing (p < 0.001), except SPO, with no significant change for G (p = 0.786). Polishing with PPPs improves the surface properties and is generally recommended. The choice of PPP has a minor role in removing discolorations. Multi-step systems should be carried out conscientiously. The proper selection of PPP is essential for the clinical outcome of surface properties of prosthetic restorations. Not every polishing paste leads to the same final surface quality.
Identifiants
pubmed: 29658069
doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2440-z
pii: 10.1007/s00784-018-2440-z
doi:
Substances chimiques
Composite Resins
0
Toothpastes
0
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
327-335Références
Quintessence Int. 1999 Mar;30(3):169-73
pubmed: 10356569
Oper Dent. 2002 Jan-Feb;27(1):50-8
pubmed: 11817469
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2002;14(4):245-51
pubmed: 12214949
Dent Mater. 2003 Jan;19(1):12-8
pubmed: 12498891
Pesqui Odontol Bras. 2003 Jan-Mar;17(1):63-8
pubmed: 12908062
Oper Dent. 2004 Mar-Apr;29(2):203-11
pubmed: 15088733
J Biomater Appl. 2004 Oct;19(2):121-34
pubmed: 15381785
Dent Mater. 2006 Feb;22(2):146-65
pubmed: 16084582
Oper Dent. 2006 Jan-Feb;31(1):11-7
pubmed: 16536188
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Oct;17 Suppl 2:68-81
pubmed: 16968383
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2007 Jan;18(1):155-63
pubmed: 17200827
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2007 Jan 01;8(1):27-35
pubmed: 17211502
Dent Mater J. 2007 Nov;26(6):915-23
pubmed: 18203499
Acta Odontol Scand. 2009;67(5):313-20
pubmed: 19565367
Dent Mater. 2010 Apr;26(4):306-19
pubmed: 20036418
Dent Off. 1990 Dec;10(4):9-10
pubmed: 2076261
Dent Mater. 2011 Apr;27(4):339-47
pubmed: 21176946
Dent Mater. 2012 May;28(5):529-34
pubmed: 22230107
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2013 Apr;20:113-25
pubmed: 23455168
J Prosthet Dent. 2013 May;109(5):325-32
pubmed: 23684283
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2014 Jan-Feb;34(1):e26-9
pubmed: 24396850
ScientificWorldJournal. 2014 Mar 03;2014:962764
pubmed: 24729757
Dent Clin North Am. 1989 Apr;33(2):305-18, 210-9
pubmed: 2542106
J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Jun;113(6):534-40
pubmed: 25749093
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2015 Nov-Dec;5(6):457-62
pubmed: 26759798
J Appl Biomater Funct Mater. 2016 Jul 26;14(3):e248-55
pubmed: 27311431
Clin Oral Investig. 2017 May;21(4):1191-1200
pubmed: 27344329
BMC Oral Health. 2016 Aug 18;16(1):74
pubmed: 27539128
J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Mar;117(3):419-425
pubmed: 27692577
J Clin Exp Dent. 2017 Jun 1;9(6):e772-e778
pubmed: 28638554
J Dent Res. 1986 Jun;65(6):892-4
pubmed: 3011867
Dent Mater. 1987 Oct;3(5):246-51
pubmed: 3479360
J Dent Res. 1984 May;63(5):685-8
pubmed: 6584473
Caries Res. 1984;18(5):385-90
pubmed: 6592039
Dent Mater. 1994 Sep;10(5):325-30
pubmed: 7498594
J Clin Periodontol. 1995 Jan;22(1):1-14
pubmed: 7706534
Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1993 Apr;5(3 Suppl 1):12-7
pubmed: 8219152
Quintessence Int. 1993 Jan;24(1):53-63
pubmed: 8390065
Quintessence Int. 1996 Apr;27(4):279-85
pubmed: 8941847
Oper Dent. 1997 Nov-Dec;22(6):260-5
pubmed: 9610323
Oper Dent. 1998 Jan-Feb;23(1):36-42
pubmed: 9610331