Multicenter Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial Comparing Hemodynamic Optimization Against Echocardiographic Optimization of AV and VV Delay of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: The BRAVO Trial.
Action Potentials
Aged
Blood Pressure
Blood Pressure Determination
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
/ adverse effects
Cross-Over Studies
Echocardiography, Doppler
Exercise Test
Exercise Tolerance
Female
Heart Failure
/ diagnostic imaging
Heart Rate
Hemodynamics
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Predictive Value of Tests
Prospective Studies
Recovery of Function
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
United Kingdom
biventricular pacing
cardiac resynchronization therapy
echocardiographic optimization
heart failure
hemodynamic optimization
optimization
Journal
JACC. Cardiovascular imaging
ISSN: 1876-7591
Titre abrégé: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101467978
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2019
08 2019
Historique:
received:
01
11
2017
revised:
09
02
2018
accepted:
15
02
2018
pubmed:
21
5
2018
medline:
25
3
2020
entrez:
21
5
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
BRAVO (British Randomized Controlled Trial of AV and VV Optimization) is a multicenter, randomized, crossover, noninferiority trial comparing echocardiographic optimization of atrioventricular (AV) and interventricular delay with a noninvasive blood pressure method. Cardiac resynchronization therapy including AV delay optimization confers clinical benefit, but the optimization requires time and expertise to perform. This study randomized patients to echocardiographic optimization or hemodynamic optimization using multiple-replicate beat-by-beat noninvasive blood pressure at baseline; after 6 months, participants were crossed over to the other optimization arm of the trial. The primary outcome was exercise capacity, quantified as peak exercise oxygen uptake. Secondary outcome measures were echocardiographic left ventricular (LV) remodeling, quality-of-life scores, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide. A total of 401 patients were enrolled, the median age was 69 years, 78% of patients were men, and the New York Heart Association functional class was II in 84% and III in 16%. The primary endpoint, peak oxygen uptake, met the criterion for noninferiority (p Optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy devices by using noninvasive blood pressure is noninferior to echocardiographic optimization. Therefore, noninvasive hemodynamic optimization is an acceptable alternative that has the potential to be automated and thus more easily implemented. (British Randomized Controlled Trial of AV and VV Optimization [BRAVO]; NCT01258829).
Sections du résumé
OBJECTIVES
BRAVO (British Randomized Controlled Trial of AV and VV Optimization) is a multicenter, randomized, crossover, noninferiority trial comparing echocardiographic optimization of atrioventricular (AV) and interventricular delay with a noninvasive blood pressure method.
BACKGROUND
Cardiac resynchronization therapy including AV delay optimization confers clinical benefit, but the optimization requires time and expertise to perform.
METHODS
This study randomized patients to echocardiographic optimization or hemodynamic optimization using multiple-replicate beat-by-beat noninvasive blood pressure at baseline; after 6 months, participants were crossed over to the other optimization arm of the trial. The primary outcome was exercise capacity, quantified as peak exercise oxygen uptake. Secondary outcome measures were echocardiographic left ventricular (LV) remodeling, quality-of-life scores, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide.
RESULTS
A total of 401 patients were enrolled, the median age was 69 years, 78% of patients were men, and the New York Heart Association functional class was II in 84% and III in 16%. The primary endpoint, peak oxygen uptake, met the criterion for noninferiority (p
CONCLUSIONS
Optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy devices by using noninvasive blood pressure is noninferior to echocardiographic optimization. Therefore, noninvasive hemodynamic optimization is an acceptable alternative that has the potential to be automated and thus more easily implemented. (British Randomized Controlled Trial of AV and VV Optimization [BRAVO]; NCT01258829).
Identifiants
pubmed: 29778861
pii: S1936-878X(18)30211-0
doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.02.014
pmc: PMC6682561
pii:
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01258829']
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Equivalence Trial
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1407-1416Subventions
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
ID : FS/10/38/28268
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
ID : FS/13/44/30291
Pays : United Kingdom
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
Eur Heart J. 2017 Mar 7;38(10):730-738
pubmed: 27941020
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Sep 20;168(1):407-13
pubmed: 23068570
Europace. 2006 May;8(5):358-66
pubmed: 16635996
Am J Cardiol. 2001 Jun 1;87(11):1328-31
pubmed: 11377372
Eur J Heart Fail. 2001 Aug;3(4):481-9
pubmed: 11511435
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Oct 3;168(3):2228-37
pubmed: 23481908
Heart Rhythm. 2004 Nov;1(5):562-7
pubmed: 15851220
Circulation. 1997 Nov 18;96(10):3273-7
pubmed: 9396415
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Dec 10;170(2):118-31
pubmed: 24239155
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012 Feb;5(1):122-30
pubmed: 22095639
N Engl J Med. 2005 Apr 14;352(15):1539-49
pubmed: 15753115
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2014 Apr 03;14:42
pubmed: 24693953
Am Heart J. 2013 Jul;166(1):20-9
pubmed: 23816017
Europace. 2012 Sep;14(9):1324-33
pubmed: 22549295
Int J Cardiol. 2015 Feb 1;180:221-2
pubmed: 25463371
Circulation. 2004 Nov 2;110(18):2864-8
pubmed: 15505095
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2009 Mar;32 Suppl 1:S236-9
pubmed: 19250104
JAMA. 2003 May 28;289(20):2685-94
pubmed: 12771115
Heart Fail Rev. 2008 Jun;13(2):245-69
pubmed: 17987381
Circulation. 1999 Jun 15;99(23):2993-3001
pubmed: 10368116
Circulation. 2001 Dec 18;104(25):3026-9
pubmed: 11748094
Eur J Clin Invest. 2010 Aug;40(8):678-84
pubmed: 20546015
Circulation. 2010 Dec 21;122(25):2660-8
pubmed: 21098426
Am J Cardiol. 2004 Jun 15;93(12):1500-3
pubmed: 15194020
Heart. 2006 Nov;92(11):1628-34
pubmed: 16709698
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 28;11(4):e0154024
pubmed: 27124724
N Engl J Med. 2004 May 20;350(21):2140-50
pubmed: 15152059
Heart Rhythm. 2013 Sep;10(9):1368-74
pubmed: 23851059
Am Heart J. 2002 Jan;143(1):34-44
pubmed: 11773910
N Engl J Med. 2002 Jun 13;346(24):1845-53
pubmed: 12063368
J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Jan 06;4(1):e000896
pubmed: 25564370
Circulation. 2000 Dec 19;102(25):3053-9
pubmed: 11120694
Heart Rhythm. 2012 Sep;9(9):1524-76
pubmed: 22939223
Age Ageing. 1997 Jan;26(1):7-13
pubmed: 9143431
Eur Heart J. 2007 Jul;28(13):1592-7
pubmed: 17298973
Am Heart J. 1992 Oct;124(4):1017-25
pubmed: 1529875