Engineering sucrose metabolism in Pseudomonas putida highlights the importance of porins.


Journal

Microbial biotechnology
ISSN: 1751-7915
Titre abrégé: Microb Biotechnol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101316335

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 2020
Historique:
received: 22 03 2018
revised: 04 05 2018
accepted: 07 05 2018
pubmed: 29 5 2018
medline: 15 5 2021
entrez: 30 5 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Using agricultural wastes as a substrate for biotechnological processes is of great interest in industrial biotechnology. A prerequisite for using these wastes is the ability of the industrially relevant microorganisms to metabolize the sugars present therein. Therefore, many metabolic engineering approaches are directed towards widening the substrate spectrum of the workhorses of industrial biotechnology like Escherichia coli, yeast or Pseudomonas putida. For instance, neither xylose or arabinose from cellulosic residues, nor sucrose, the main sugar in waste molasses, can be metabolized by most E. coli and P. putida wild types. We evaluated a new, so far uncharacterized gene cluster for sucrose metabolism from Pseudomonas protegens Pf-5 and showed that it enables P. putida to grow on sucrose as the sole carbon and energy source. Even when integrated into the genome of P. putida, the resulting strain grew on sucrose at rates similar to the rate of the wild type on glucose - making it the fastest growing, plasmid-free P. putida strain known so far using sucrose as substrate. Next, we elucidated the role of the porin, an orthologue of the sucrose porin ScrY, in the gene cluster and found that in P. putida, a porin is needed for sucrose transport across the outer membrane. Consequently, native porins were not sufficient to allow unlimited growth on sucrose. Therefore, we concluded that the outer membrane can be a considerable barrier for substrate transport, depending on strain, genotype and culture conditions, all of which should be taken into account in metabolic engineering approaches. We additionally showed the potential of the engineered P. putida strains by growing them on molasses with efficiencies twice as high as obtained with the wild-type P. putida. This can be seen as a further step towards the production of low-value chemicals and biofuels with P. putida from alternative and more affordable substrates in the future.

Identifiants

pubmed: 29808622
doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.13283
pmc: PMC6922520
doi:

Substances chimiques

Porins 0
Sucrose 57-50-1

Banques de données

GENBANK
['EFK49434.1', 'EGI19556.1']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

97-106

Informations de copyright

© 2018 The Authors. Microbial Biotechnology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd and Society for Applied Microbiology.

Références

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992 Feb;58(2):536-44
pubmed: 1610179
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1988 Mar 3;938(3):493-6
pubmed: 2450582
BMC Genomics. 2010 May 19;11:311
pubmed: 20482812
ACS Synth Biol. 2017 May 19;6(5):793-805
pubmed: 28121421
Metab Eng. 2018 Jul;48:94-108
pubmed: 29864584
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013 Jan;79(2):478-87
pubmed: 23124236
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012 Mar;93(6):2279-90
pubmed: 22350258
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 Aug;74(16):5031-7
pubmed: 18586973
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2003 Dec;67(4):593-656
pubmed: 14665678
Microb Biotechnol. 2020 Jan;13(1):97-106
pubmed: 29808622
J Bacteriol. 1982 Nov;152(2):636-42
pubmed: 6813310
J Biol Chem. 1999 Oct 8;274(41):29228-41
pubmed: 10506180
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 Feb;75(4):931-6
pubmed: 19060171
Methods Enzymol. 1994;235:386-405
pubmed: 8057911
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015 Aug;99(15):6197-214
pubmed: 26099332
PLoS Biol. 2012 Jan;10(1):e1001242
pubmed: 22272184
FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2015 Jul;39(4):555-66
pubmed: 25934123
Microb Cell Fact. 2013 Mar 18;12:26
pubmed: 23506076
J Biol Chem. 2012 Nov 30;287(49):41044-52
pubmed: 23066028
Microb Cell Fact. 2014 Jun 19;13:88
pubmed: 24948031
J Bacteriol. 2007 Jun;189(12):4529-33
pubmed: 17416664
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 May 26;95(11):6419-24
pubmed: 9600981
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2007 Sep;6(9):1527-50
pubmed: 17446557
Arch Microbiol. 1977 Feb 4;112(1):49-55
pubmed: 139135
J Bacteriol. 1991 Aug;173(16):4970-6
pubmed: 1650338
Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Jan 4;44(D1):D646-53
pubmed: 26578582
Microbiologyopen. 2017 Aug;6(4):
pubmed: 28349670
Microbiology (Reading). 2011 May;157(Pt 5):1531-1540
pubmed: 21330430
Microbiology (Reading). 2016 Sep;162(9):1535-1543
pubmed: 27417954
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2017 Jul 19;10:190
pubmed: 28814973
J Proteome Res. 2014 Oct 3;13(10):4298-309
pubmed: 25198519
Mol Microbiol. 1988 Jan;2(1):1-8
pubmed: 2835584
J Mol Biol. 1990 Oct 5;215(3):403-10
pubmed: 2231712

Auteurs

Hannes Löwe (H)

Systems Biotechnology, Technical University of Munich, 85748, Garching, Germany.

Peter Sinner (P)

Systems Biotechnology, Technical University of Munich, 85748, Garching, Germany.

Andreas Kremling (A)

Systems Biotechnology, Technical University of Munich, 85748, Garching, Germany.

Katharina Pflüger-Grau (K)

Systems Biotechnology, Technical University of Munich, 85748, Garching, Germany.

Articles similaires

Female Biofilms Animals Lactobacillus Mice
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Aldehydes Biotransformation Flavoring Agents Lipoxygenase
Host Specificity Bacteriophages Genomics Algorithms Escherichia coli
Biofilms Horses Animals Escherichia coli Mesenchymal Stem Cells

Classifications MeSH