Update on the ICUD-SIU consultation on multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging in localised prostate cancer.


Journal

World journal of urology
ISSN: 1433-8726
Titre abrégé: World J Urol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8307716

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2019
Historique:
received: 14 01 2018
accepted: 28 06 2018
pubmed: 14 7 2018
medline: 8 8 2019
entrez: 14 7 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Prostate cancer (PCa) imaging is a rapidly evolving field. Dramatic improvements in prostate MRI during the last decade will probably change the accuracy of diagnosis. This chapter reviews recent current evidence about MRI diagnostic performance and impact on PCa management. The International Consultation on Urological Diseases nominated a committee to review the literature on prostate MRI. A search of the PubMed database was conducted to identify articles focussed on MP-MRI detection and staging protocols, reporting and scoring systems, the role of MP-MRI in diagnosing PCa prior to biopsy, in active surveillance, in focal therapy and in detecting local recurrence after treatment. Differences in opinion were reported in the use of the strength of magnets [1.5 Tesla (T) vs. 3T] and coils. More agreement was found regarding the choice of pulse sequences; diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI), dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE MRI), and/or MR spectroscopy imaging (MRSI) are recommended in addition to conventional T2-weighted anatomical sequences. In 2015, the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS version 2) was described to standardize image acquisition and interpretation. MP-MRI improves detection of clinically significant PCa (csPCa) in the repeat biopsy setting or before the confirmatory biopsy in patients considering active surveillance. It is useful to guide focal treatment and to detect local recurrences after treatment. Its role in biopsy-naive patients or during the course of active surveillance remains debated. MP-MRI is increasingly used to improve detection of csPCa and for the selection of a suitable therapeutic approach.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30003373
doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2395-3
pii: 10.1007/s00345-018-2395-3
doi:

Substances chimiques

Contrast Media 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

429-436

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Références

Eur Urol. 2001 Sep;40(3):265-74
pubmed: 11684842
Urology. 2003 Nov;62(5):900-4
pubmed: 14624916
Radiology. 2004 May;231(2):379-85
pubmed: 15064390
Urology. 2004 May;63(5):922-7
pubmed: 15134982
Radiology. 2004 Sep;232(3):830-3
pubmed: 15273337
Radiology. 2007 Jul;244(1):184-95
pubmed: 17495178
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2007 Jul-Aug;31(4):534-8
pubmed: 17882027
Eur Radiol. 2009 Mar;19(3):761-9
pubmed: 18825386
Radiology. 2009 Apr;251(1):122-33
pubmed: 19332850
Rofo. 2009 Jun;181(6):536-42
pubmed: 19353483
Eur Radiol. 2010 Jan;20(1):48-55
pubmed: 19690866
Eur Urol. 2011 Apr;59(4):477-94
pubmed: 21195536
Urol Oncol. 2013 May;31(4):448-54
pubmed: 21775172
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Aug;197(2):408-14
pubmed: 21785087
J Urol. 2011 Nov;186(5):1818-24
pubmed: 21944089
Eur Radiol. 2012 Apr;22(4):746-57
pubmed: 22322308
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Apr 1;82(5):e787-93
pubmed: 22331003
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Mar;198(3):W228-36
pubmed: 22358019
Eur Urol. 2013 Jan;63(1):125-40
pubmed: 22743165
J Urol. 2013 Nov;190(5):1728-34
pubmed: 23680307
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Jun;39(6):1443-8
pubmed: 24243824
J Am Coll Radiol. 2014 Feb;11(2):156-60
pubmed: 24389134
Radiother Oncol. 2014 Feb;110(2):303-8
pubmed: 24444524
Radiology. 2014 Aug;272(2):446-55
pubmed: 24937690
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2014 Jul-Aug;95(7-8):743-52
pubmed: 25043317
Insights Imaging. 2014 Dec;5(6):697-713
pubmed: 25288529
Radiology. 2015 Apr;275(1):144-54
pubmed: 25423145
Urol Oncol. 2015 Jan;33(1):17.e1-17.e7
pubmed: 25443268
Eur Urol. 2015 Sep;68(3):438-50
pubmed: 25480312
Radiology. 2015 May;275(2):458-68
pubmed: 25599415
Urology. 2015 Feb;85(2):423-8
pubmed: 25623709
J Urol. 2015 Aug;194(2):364-70
pubmed: 25711199
Curr Opin Urol. 2015 May;25(3):198-204
pubmed: 25768693
Eur Urol. 2016 Jan;69(1):149-56
pubmed: 25862143
Eur Urol. 2016 Jan;69(1):16-40
pubmed: 26427566
Eur Urol. 2017 Aug;72(2):177-188
pubmed: 28196723
Radiology. 1997 Jun;203(3):653-9
pubmed: 9169684

Auteurs

Eric Barret (E)

Department of Urology, Institut Montsouris, Paris, France. eric.barret@imm.fr.

Baris Turkbey (B)

Molecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Philippe Puech (P)

Department of Radiology, CHU Lille, University of Lille, Lille, France.

Matthieu Durand (M)

Department of Urology, CHU Nice, Nice, France.

Valeria Panebianco (V)

Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Jurgen J Fütterer (JJ)

Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Raphaële Renard-Penna (R)

Academic Department of Radiology, Hopital Tenon-Hopital Pitié-Salpétrière, AP-HP, UPMC Univ Paris 06, Paris, France.

Olivier Rouvière (O)

Department of Urinary and Vascular Imaging, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, University Lyon 1, Lyon, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH