Multicenter Evaluation of Prosthesis Oversizing of the SAPIEN 3 Transcatheter Heart Valve. Impact on Device Failure and New Pacemaker Implantations.
Aged, 80 and over
Aortic Valve
/ diagnostic imaging
Aortic Valve Stenosis
/ diagnosis
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Heart Valve Prosthesis
/ adverse effects
Humans
Male
Multidetector Computed Tomography
Pacemaker, Artificial
Postoperative Complications
/ etiology
Prosthesis Failure
Retrospective Studies
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
/ adverse effects
Treatment Outcome
Device failure
Dimensionamiento de la prótesis
Fallo de dispositivo
Implante percutáneo de válvula aórtica
Marcapasos
Pacemaker
Sizing
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Journal
Revista espanola de cardiologia (English ed.)
ISSN: 1885-5857
Titre abrégé: Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed)
Pays: Spain
ID NLM: 101587954
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2019
Aug 2019
Historique:
received:
17
10
2017
accepted:
21
05
2018
pubmed:
19
7
2018
medline:
18
12
2019
entrez:
19
7
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A certain degree of prosthesis oversizing (OS) is recommended for the SAPIEN 3 to achieve device success. However, an increase in OS may increase permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) rates. We therefore investigated the influence of OS on device failure and PPI. A total of 804 patients were treated with SAPIEN 3 at 3 centers. Multislice computed tomography-derived OS was calculated and analyzed both as a continuous variable and categorized in 5% increments with -4% to 0% as reference. Device failure occurred in 8.8% of patients. Median OS was lower in patients with device failure vs those with device success (+4% vs +8%; P=.038). A nonlinear risk pattern was shown for OS with a significantly reduced device failure rate within 4% to +22% of OS. There was no case of paravalvular leakage II+ between +10% to +20% of OS. The overall PPI rate was 16.2% and the median OS was significantly larger in patients with PPI (PPI: +9% vs no PPI: +7%; P = .025), while implantation depth did not vary in patients with vs without PPI (6.9±1.7 mm vs 6.6±1.9 mm; P=.101). The risk of PPI increased with increasing OS and was highest in the 2 highest categories. An increase in OS reduces the risk for device failure but increases the risk for PPI. There was no ideal range of OS to minimize both device failure and PPI.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30017841
pii: S1885-5857(18)30239-1
doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2018.06.005
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
spa
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
641-648Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2018 Sociedad Española de Cardiología. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.