Bromocriptine treatment in patients with peripartum cardiomyopathy and right ventricular dysfunction.
Bromocriptine
/ administration & dosage
Cardiomyopathies
/ complications
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Echocardiography
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Heart Ventricles
/ diagnostic imaging
Hormone Antagonists
/ administration & dosage
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine
Peripartum Period
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular
Prospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
Ventricular Dysfunction, Right
/ drug therapy
Ventricular Function, Right
/ physiology
Bromocriptine therapy
Peripartum cardiomyopathy
Right ventricular dysfunction
Journal
Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society
ISSN: 1861-0692
Titre abrégé: Clin Res Cardiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101264123
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2019
Mar 2019
Historique:
received:
17
05
2018
accepted:
10
08
2018
pubmed:
20
8
2018
medline:
29
5
2019
entrez:
20
8
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction predicts adverse outcome in peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM). We recently demonstrated beneficial effects associated with the prolactin release inhibitor bromocriptine at different doses when added to standard heart failure therapy in PPCM. Here, we evaluated for the first time the therapeutic potential of bromocriptine particularly in PPCM patients with RV involvement. In this study, 40 patients with PPCM were included, of whom 24 patients had reduced RV ejection fraction (RVEF < 45%). We examined the effect of short-term (1W: bromocriptine, 2.5 mg, 7 days, n = 10) compared with long-term bromocriptine treatment (8W: 5 mg for 2 weeks followed by 2.5 mg for another 6 weeks, n = 14) in addition to guideline-based heart failure therapy in patients with an initial RVEF < 45% on the following outcomes: (1) change from baseline (Δ delta) in RVEF, (2) change from baseline in left ventricular EF (LVEF), and (3) rate of patients with full LV recovery (LVEF ≥ 50%) and (4) rate of patients with full RV recovery (RVEF ≥ 55%) at 6-month follow-up as assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Reduced RVEF at initial presentation was associated with a lower rate of full cardiac recovery at 6-month follow-up (patients with RV dysfunction: 58% vs. patients with normal RV function: 81%; p = 0.027). RVEF increased from 38 ± 7 to 53 ± 11% with a delta-RVEF of + 15 ± 12% in the 1W group, and from 35 ± 9 to 58 ± 7% with a Δ RVEF of + 23 ± 10% in the 8W group (Δ RVEF 1W vs 8W: p = 0.118). LVEF increased from 25 ± 8 to 46 ± 12% with a Δ LVEF of + 21 ± 11% in the 1W group, and from 22 ± 6 to 49 ± 10% with a Δ LVEF of + 27 ± 9% in the 8W group (Δ LVEF 1W vs 8W: p = 0.211). Full LV recovery was present in 50% of the 1W group and in 64% of the 8W group (p = 0.678). Full RV recovery was observed in 40% of the 1W group and in 79% of the 8W group (p = 0.092). Despite overall worse outcome in patients with RV dysfunction at baseline, bromocriptine treatment in PPCM patients with RV involvement was associated with a high rate of full RV and LV recovery, although no significant differences were observed between the short-term and long-term bromocriptine treatment regime. These findings suggest that bromocriptine in addition to standard heart failure therapy may be also effective in PPCM patients with biventricular impairment.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction predicts adverse outcome in peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM). We recently demonstrated beneficial effects associated with the prolactin release inhibitor bromocriptine at different doses when added to standard heart failure therapy in PPCM. Here, we evaluated for the first time the therapeutic potential of bromocriptine particularly in PPCM patients with RV involvement.
METHODS
METHODS
In this study, 40 patients with PPCM were included, of whom 24 patients had reduced RV ejection fraction (RVEF < 45%). We examined the effect of short-term (1W: bromocriptine, 2.5 mg, 7 days, n = 10) compared with long-term bromocriptine treatment (8W: 5 mg for 2 weeks followed by 2.5 mg for another 6 weeks, n = 14) in addition to guideline-based heart failure therapy in patients with an initial RVEF < 45% on the following outcomes: (1) change from baseline (Δ delta) in RVEF, (2) change from baseline in left ventricular EF (LVEF), and (3) rate of patients with full LV recovery (LVEF ≥ 50%) and (4) rate of patients with full RV recovery (RVEF ≥ 55%) at 6-month follow-up as assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Reduced RVEF at initial presentation was associated with a lower rate of full cardiac recovery at 6-month follow-up (patients with RV dysfunction: 58% vs. patients with normal RV function: 81%; p = 0.027). RVEF increased from 38 ± 7 to 53 ± 11% with a delta-RVEF of + 15 ± 12% in the 1W group, and from 35 ± 9 to 58 ± 7% with a Δ RVEF of + 23 ± 10% in the 8W group (Δ RVEF 1W vs 8W: p = 0.118). LVEF increased from 25 ± 8 to 46 ± 12% with a Δ LVEF of + 21 ± 11% in the 1W group, and from 22 ± 6 to 49 ± 10% with a Δ LVEF of + 27 ± 9% in the 8W group (Δ LVEF 1W vs 8W: p = 0.211). Full LV recovery was present in 50% of the 1W group and in 64% of the 8W group (p = 0.678). Full RV recovery was observed in 40% of the 1W group and in 79% of the 8W group (p = 0.092).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Despite overall worse outcome in patients with RV dysfunction at baseline, bromocriptine treatment in PPCM patients with RV involvement was associated with a high rate of full RV and LV recovery, although no significant differences were observed between the short-term and long-term bromocriptine treatment regime. These findings suggest that bromocriptine in addition to standard heart failure therapy may be also effective in PPCM patients with biventricular impairment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30121697
doi: 10.1007/s00392-018-1355-7
pii: 10.1007/s00392-018-1355-7
pmc: PMC6394477
doi:
Substances chimiques
Hormone Antagonists
0
Bromocriptine
3A64E3G5ZO
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
290-297Subventions
Organisme : German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)
ID : 01KG1001
Références
Circulation. 2006 Oct 24;114(17):1883-91
pubmed: 17060398
Cell. 2007 Feb 9;128(3):589-600
pubmed: 17289576
Circulation. 2010 Apr 6;121(13):1465-73
pubmed: 20308616
Eur J Heart Fail. 2010 Aug;12(8):767-78
pubmed: 20675664
Nature. 2012 May 09;485(7398):333-8
pubmed: 22596155
Heart. 2013 Mar;99(5):308-13
pubmed: 23118348
Basic Res Cardiol. 2013 Jul;108(4):366
pubmed: 23812247
Eur Heart J. 2015 May 7;36(18):1090-7
pubmed: 25636745
Clin Res Cardiol. 2015 Nov;104(11):911-7
pubmed: 26026286
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Aug 25;66(8):905-14
pubmed: 26293760
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jan 21;374(3):233-41
pubmed: 26735901
Circ Heart Fail. 2016 May;9(5):
pubmed: 27166247
Eur J Heart Fail. 2016 Sep;18(9):1096-105
pubmed: 27338866
Clin Res Cardiol. 2017 Feb;106(2):127-139
pubmed: 27576561
Kardiol Pol. 2016;74(10):1037-1147
pubmed: 27748494
ESC Heart Fail. 2015 Dec;2(4):139-149
pubmed: 27774259
Eur J Heart Fail. 2017 Sep;19(9):1131-1141
pubmed: 28271625
Clin Res Cardiol. 2017 Aug;106(8):582-589
pubmed: 28275862
Eur Heart J. 2017 Sep 14;38(35):2671-2679
pubmed: 28934837
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Nov 1;2(11):1256-1260
pubmed: 29049825