Cost Implications of Oral Contrast Administration in the Emergency Department: A Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing Analysis.
Abdominal Pain
/ diagnostic imaging
Administration, Oral
Contrast Media
/ administration & dosage
Costs and Cost Analysis
Diagnosis, Differential
Emergency Service, Hospital
/ economics
Humans
Organizational Policy
Process Assessment, Health Care
Prospective Studies
Radiography, Abdominal
/ economics
Retrospective Studies
Time and Motion Studies
Oral contrast
abdominal pain
emergency department
health care cost analysis
time-driven activity-based costing
Journal
Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR
ISSN: 1558-349X
Titre abrégé: J Am Coll Radiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101190326
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2019
Jan 2019
Historique:
received:
20
06
2018
revised:
25
06
2018
accepted:
20
07
2018
pubmed:
31
8
2018
medline:
1
8
2019
entrez:
31
8
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To quantify the monetary and time costs associated with oral contrast administration in the emergency department (ED) for patients with nontraumatic abdominal pain and to evaluate the cost savings associated with an institutional policy change in the criteria for oral contrast administration. A HIPAA-complaint, institutional review board-approved time-driven activity-based costing analysis was performed using both prospective time studies and retrospective data obtained from a quaternary care center. Retrospective data spanned a 1-year period (January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2016). A process map was generated. Examination volume-related data, labor costs, and material costs were determined and applied to a base-case model. Univariate and multivariate sensitivity analyses were conducted. Multivariate analysis was used to estimate the cost savings associated with a policy change eliminating oral contrast for patients with body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m The baseline oral contrast utilization rate was 86% (4,541 of 5,263). The annual base-case cost estimate for oral contrast administration was $82,552. In multivariate analyses, this ranged from $13,685 to $315,393. The model was most sensitive to the volume of CTs requiring oral contrast. Applying parameters from the new policy change reduced the annual cost by 52% (cost saving: $35,836.57). Impact of oral contrast on time to discharge was highly variable and dependent on the contrast agent utilized. Costs associated with oral contrast in the ED are modest and should be balanced with its potential diagnostic benefits. Our criteria reduced oral contrast utilization by 52%.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30158081
pii: S1546-1440(18)30893-7
doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.07.021
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Contrast Media
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
30-38Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2018 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.