HLA-Mismatched Donors in Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndrome: An EBMT Registry Analysis.
Aged
Disease-Free Survival
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Graft vs Host Disease
/ metabolism
HLA Antigens
/ metabolism
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Histocompatibility Testing
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Myelodysplastic Syndromes
/ metabolism
Registries
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Survival Rate
Unrelated Donors
HLA-mismatched donor
Haploidentical transplant
MDS
Myelodysplastic syndrome
Journal
Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation
ISSN: 1523-6536
Titre abrégé: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9600628
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2019
01 2019
Historique:
received:
04
07
2018
accepted:
23
08
2018
pubmed:
3
9
2018
medline:
24
12
2019
entrez:
3
9
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Recently, haploidentical transplantation (haplo) using post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) has been reported to give very encouraging results in patients with hematological malignancies. Patients who have no HLA-matched donor currently have the choice between a mismatched unrelated donor, an unrelated cord blood (CB) donor, and a haploidentical related donor. The aim of our study is to compare the outcome of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) who have been transplanted from a haploidentical donor using PTCy, an HLA-mismatched unrelated donor (marrow or peripheral blood stem cells), or an unrelated mismatched CB donor. A total of 833 MDS patients from the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) registry, transplanted between 2011 and 2016, were identified. The potential benefit of haplo was compared with mismatched unrelated and CB donors in an adjusted and weighted model taking into account potential confounders and other prognostic variables. Haplo was at lower risk of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) than mismatched unrelated donor (P = .010) but at similar risk than CB. Progression-free survival was better after haplo (versus mismatched unrelated, P = .056; versus CB, P = .003) and overall survival tended to be superior after haplo (versus mismatched unrelated, P = .082; versus CB, P = .002). Nonrelapse mortality was not significantly different between haplo and mismatched unrelated donors. Relapse risk was not influenced by the type of donor. In conclusion, patients with MDS from the EBMT registry receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from a haplo donor have significantly better outcome than those receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from a CB donor and at least similar or better outcome than with a mismatched unrelated donor. Prospective studies comparing the type of donors will be needed to confirm this assumption.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30172776
pii: S1083-8791(18)30528-7
doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.08.026
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
HLA Antigens
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
114-120Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.