Endoscopic Closure of Gastro-gastric Fistula After Gastric Bypass: a Technically Feasible Procedure but Associated with Low Success Rate.
Bypass
Endoscopic suturing
Endosurgery
Gastro-gastric fistula
Journal
Obesity surgery
ISSN: 1708-0428
Titre abrégé: Obes Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9106714
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2019
01 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
3
9
2018
medline:
8
1
2020
entrez:
3
9
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Gastro-gastric fistulas (GGF) are reported to be as high as 12% after gastric bypass for treatment of morbid obesity. While different endoscopic methods are described, the management traditionally consists of surgical revision with high associated morbidity. The aim of the study was to assess feasibility, safety and success rate of endoscopic closure using an endoscopic suturing device. From January 2016 to March 2018, we reviewed the electronic records of all patients undergoing endoscopic closure of a GGF with the Apollo Overstitch system (Apollo Endosurgery, Austin, Texas, USA). Demographic details, procedure details, and outcome variables were recorded. A total of six patients (M:F = 5:1) underwent endoscopic fistula closure. Five patients (83.3%) had a prior banded gastric bypass (with subsequent band removal). The median number of prior abdominal surgeries was 3, the mean time from bypass to endoscopic fistula closure was 5 years (range 1.1-10.4). While immediate complete endoscopic fistula closure was possible in 10 of 12 attempts in those six patients (83%), all patients had recurrent (persistent) fistulas at follow-up. After a mean follow-up time of 12 months, 83.3% had further laparoscopic converted to open (n = 2) or laparoscopic (n = 3) revisions with complete fistula closure. One patient is refusing further intervention. Endoscopic gastro-gastric fistula closure with an endoscopic suturing device is feasible and safe. Unfortunately, due to the nature of gastro-gastric fistulas, permanent successful closure is rare. Therefore, the approach should be reserved for patients in whom a laparoscopic or open surgical attempt is impossible due to prior abdominal revisions.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Gastro-gastric fistulas (GGF) are reported to be as high as 12% after gastric bypass for treatment of morbid obesity. While different endoscopic methods are described, the management traditionally consists of surgical revision with high associated morbidity. The aim of the study was to assess feasibility, safety and success rate of endoscopic closure using an endoscopic suturing device.
METHODS
From January 2016 to March 2018, we reviewed the electronic records of all patients undergoing endoscopic closure of a GGF with the Apollo Overstitch system (Apollo Endosurgery, Austin, Texas, USA). Demographic details, procedure details, and outcome variables were recorded.
RESULTS
A total of six patients (M:F = 5:1) underwent endoscopic fistula closure. Five patients (83.3%) had a prior banded gastric bypass (with subsequent band removal). The median number of prior abdominal surgeries was 3, the mean time from bypass to endoscopic fistula closure was 5 years (range 1.1-10.4). While immediate complete endoscopic fistula closure was possible in 10 of 12 attempts in those six patients (83%), all patients had recurrent (persistent) fistulas at follow-up. After a mean follow-up time of 12 months, 83.3% had further laparoscopic converted to open (n = 2) or laparoscopic (n = 3) revisions with complete fistula closure. One patient is refusing further intervention.
CONCLUSION
Endoscopic gastro-gastric fistula closure with an endoscopic suturing device is feasible and safe. Unfortunately, due to the nature of gastro-gastric fistulas, permanent successful closure is rare. Therefore, the approach should be reserved for patients in whom a laparoscopic or open surgical attempt is impossible due to prior abdominal revisions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30173285
doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3488-1
pii: 10.1007/s11695-018-3488-1
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
23-27Références
Endosc Int Open. 2017 Sep;5(9):E900-E904
pubmed: 28924597
Endoscopy. 2016 Nov;48(11):1023-1028
pubmed: 27576179
Endosc Int Open. 2016 Feb;4(2):E222-7
pubmed: 26878054
J Gastrointest Surg. 2007 Dec;11(12):1673-9
pubmed: 17912592
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2005 Sep-Oct;1(5):467-74
pubmed: 16925272
J Am Coll Surg. 1997 Jul;185(1):1-7
pubmed: 9208953
Ann Surg. 1995 Apr;221(4):387-91
pubmed: 7726674
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017 Jan;13(1):15-20
pubmed: 27693362
Surg Clin North Am. 2005 Feb;85(1):119-27, x
pubmed: 15619533
Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Mar;71(3):606-11
pubmed: 20018279
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010 May-Jun;6(3):282-8
pubmed: 20510291
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015 Nov-Dec;11(6):1227-32
pubmed: 26003896
Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Dec;58(6):867-70
pubmed: 14652554
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008 Nov;93(11 Suppl 1):S89-96
pubmed: 18987275
Obes Surg. 2018 Apr;28(4):939-944
pubmed: 28983751
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2006 Mar-Apr;2(2):117-21
pubmed: 16925334
JAMA. 2005 Oct 19;294(15):1909-17
pubmed: 16234497
Obes Surg. 2010 Aug;20(8):1090-5
pubmed: 20440578
Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Feb;59(2):296-300
pubmed: 14745411
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Apr;204(4):617-24
pubmed: 17382221