The genetic landscape of gliomas arising after therapeutic radiation.
Astrocytoma
Chromosome breaks
DNA double-strand breaks
Ganglioglioma
Genomic signature
Glioblastoma
Ionizing radiation
Mutational signature
Radiation therapy
Radiation-associated glioma
Radiation-induced glioma (RIG)
Secondary malignancy
Journal
Acta neuropathologica
ISSN: 1432-0533
Titre abrégé: Acta Neuropathol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0412041
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2019
01 2019
Historique:
received:
27
07
2018
accepted:
01
09
2018
revised:
31
08
2018
pubmed:
10
9
2018
medline:
28
3
2020
entrez:
10
9
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Radiotherapy improves survival for common childhood cancers such as medulloblastoma, leukemia, and germ cell tumors. Unfortunately, long-term survivors suffer sequelae that can include secondary neoplasia. Gliomas are common secondary neoplasms after cranial or craniospinal radiation, most often manifesting as high-grade astrocytomas with poor clinical outcomes. Here, we performed genetic profiling on a cohort of 12 gliomas arising after therapeutic radiation to determine their molecular pathogenesis and assess for differences in genomic signature compared to their spontaneous counterparts. We identified a high frequency of TP53 mutations, CDK4 amplification or CDKN2A homozygous deletion, and amplifications or rearrangements involving receptor tyrosine kinase and Ras-Raf-MAP kinase pathway genes including PDGFRA, MET, BRAF, and RRAS2. Notably, all tumors lacked alterations in IDH1, IDH2, H3F3A, HIST1H3B, HIST1H3C, TERT (including promoter region), and PTEN, which genetically define the major subtypes of diffuse gliomas in children and adults. All gliomas in this cohort had very low somatic mutation burden (less than three somatic single nucleotide variants or small indels per Mb). The ten high-grade gliomas demonstrated markedly aneuploid genomes, with significantly increased quantity of intrachromosomal copy number breakpoints and focal amplifications/homozygous deletions compared to spontaneous high-grade gliomas, likely as a result of DNA double-strand breaks induced by gamma radiation. Together, these findings demonstrate a distinct molecular pathogenesis of secondary gliomas arising after radiation therapy and identify a genomic signature that may aid in differentiating these tumors from their spontaneous counterparts.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30196423
doi: 10.1007/s00401-018-1906-z
pii: 10.1007/s00401-018-1906-z
pmc: PMC6589431
mid: NIHMS1027024
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
Telomerase
EC 2.7.7.49
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
139-150Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : T32 CA151022
Pays : United States
Organisme : ODCDC CDC HHS
ID : DP5 OD021403
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA227136
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R01 NS079697
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : T32 CA128583
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R35 CA220481
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P50 CA097257
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : DP5 OD021403
Pays : United States
Références
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Nov 15;96(4):717-721
pubmed: 27788944
Nat Genet. 2014 May;46(5):444-450
pubmed: 24705251
Brain Tumor Pathol. 2017 Oct;34(4):149-154
pubmed: 28795231
J Neurooncol. 2005 Sep;74(2):151-4
pubmed: 16193385
Cancer Cell. 2017 Oct 9;32(4):520-537.e5
pubmed: 28966033
Acta Neuropathol. 2018 Mar;135(3):485-488
pubmed: 29428973
Cancer Res. 1991 Dec 1;51(23 Pt 1):6393-6
pubmed: 1933904
Nat Commun. 2016 Sep 12;7:12605
pubmed: 27615322
Cancer. 1998 Jan 1;82(1):8-34
pubmed: 9428476
Oncogene. 2015 Feb 19;34(8):1064-72
pubmed: 24632607
Acta Neuropathol. 2013 May;125(5):659-69
pubmed: 23417712
Acta Neuropathol. 2018 Apr;135(4):635-638
pubmed: 29435664
Brain Pathol. 2019 Jan;29(1):85-96
pubmed: 30051528
Nat Commun. 2017 Aug 4;8(1):186
pubmed: 28775249
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 25;372(26):2499-508
pubmed: 26061753
J Clin Oncol. 1998 Dec;16(12):3761-7
pubmed: 9850019
Acta Neuropathol. 2018 Jun;135(6):939-953
pubmed: 29644394
Cell. 2013 Oct 10;155(2):462-77
pubmed: 24120142
J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2007 Aug;66(8):740-9
pubmed: 17882018
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jun 20;28(18):3061-8
pubmed: 20479398
Acta Neuropathol. 2017 Jul;134(1):155-158
pubmed: 28474103
Surg Neurol Int. 2012;3:48
pubmed: 22629485
Nature. 2008 Oct 23;455(7216):1061-8
pubmed: 18772890
Nature. 2013 Aug 22;500(7463):415-21
pubmed: 23945592
Am J Pathol. 1999 May;154(5):1431-8
pubmed: 10329596
Neuro Oncol. 2017 May 1;19(5):699-709
pubmed: 28453743
J Neurooncol. 2008 Sep;89(2):169-77
pubmed: 18566750
Brain Pathol. 2016 Sep;26(5):569-80
pubmed: 26517431
Neurosurg Rev. 2018 Jul;41(3):719-731
pubmed: 27709409
Acta Neuropathol. 2015 Apr;129(4):609-610
pubmed: 25720745
Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2018 Jun 7;6(1):47
pubmed: 29880043
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 25;372(26):2481-98
pubmed: 26061751
Acta Neuropathol. 2016 Nov;132(5):757-760
pubmed: 27624885