Intraoperative air leak test reduces the rate of postoperative anastomotic leak: analysis of 777 laparoscopic left-sided colon resections.


Journal

Surgical endoscopy
ISSN: 1432-2218
Titre abrégé: Surg Endosc
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8806653

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 2019
Historique:
received: 07 04 2018
accepted: 04 09 2018
pubmed: 12 9 2018
medline: 3 4 2020
entrez: 12 9 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The evidence supporting the use of the air leak test (ALT) after laparoscopic left-sided colon resection (LLCR) to test the colorectal anastomosis (CA) integrity aiming at reducing the rate of postoperative CA leakage (CAL) is not conclusive. The aim of this study was to challenge the use of ALT after elective LLCR. It is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database including all patients undergoing elective LLCR with primary CA and no proximal bowel diversion between January 1996 and June 2017. The decision to perform the ALT was based on the individual surgeon routine practice. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for CAL. A total of 777 LLCR without proximal diversion were included in the analysis: the CA was tested in 398 patients (ALT group), while intraoperative ALT was not performed in 379 patients (No-ALT group). The two groups were similar in demographic characteristics, indication, and type of procedure. Intraoperative ALT was positive in 20 (5%) patients: a stoma was created in 14 (70%) patients, while 6 (30%) patients had a suture repair alone. Overall, postoperative CAL occurred in 32 patients (4.1%): the postoperative CAL rate was lower in ALT patients (2.5% vs. 5.8%, p = 0.025). A reoperation was needed in 87.5% of cases. No CAL occurred in the 20 patients with intraoperative positive ALT. Multivariate analysis showed that ASA score 3-4 (OR 5.39, 95% CI 2.53-11.51, p < 0.001) and male sex (OR 3.96, 95% CI 1.66-9.43, p = 0.002) were independent risk factors for postoperative CAL, while intraoperative ALT independently reduced the postoperative CAL rate (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.18-0.88, p = 0.022). Intraoperative ALT allows to detect AL defects after LLCR that can be effectively managed intraoperatively, leading to a significant lower risk of postoperative CAL.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The evidence supporting the use of the air leak test (ALT) after laparoscopic left-sided colon resection (LLCR) to test the colorectal anastomosis (CA) integrity aiming at reducing the rate of postoperative CA leakage (CAL) is not conclusive. The aim of this study was to challenge the use of ALT after elective LLCR.
METHODS
It is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database including all patients undergoing elective LLCR with primary CA and no proximal bowel diversion between January 1996 and June 2017. The decision to perform the ALT was based on the individual surgeon routine practice. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for CAL.
RESULTS
A total of 777 LLCR without proximal diversion were included in the analysis: the CA was tested in 398 patients (ALT group), while intraoperative ALT was not performed in 379 patients (No-ALT group). The two groups were similar in demographic characteristics, indication, and type of procedure. Intraoperative ALT was positive in 20 (5%) patients: a stoma was created in 14 (70%) patients, while 6 (30%) patients had a suture repair alone. Overall, postoperative CAL occurred in 32 patients (4.1%): the postoperative CAL rate was lower in ALT patients (2.5% vs. 5.8%, p = 0.025). A reoperation was needed in 87.5% of cases. No CAL occurred in the 20 patients with intraoperative positive ALT. Multivariate analysis showed that ASA score 3-4 (OR 5.39, 95% CI 2.53-11.51, p < 0.001) and male sex (OR 3.96, 95% CI 1.66-9.43, p = 0.002) were independent risk factors for postoperative CAL, while intraoperative ALT independently reduced the postoperative CAL rate (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.18-0.88, p = 0.022).
CONCLUSION
Intraoperative ALT allows to detect AL defects after LLCR that can be effectively managed intraoperatively, leading to a significant lower risk of postoperative CAL.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30203203
doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6421-8
pii: 10.1007/s00464-018-6421-8
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1592-1599

Références

Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1988 Nov;70(6):345-7
pubmed: 3207322
J Am Coll Surg. 2000 Nov;191(5):504-10
pubmed: 11085730
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008 Mar;23(3):265-70
pubmed: 18034250
J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83
pubmed: 3558716
Eur J Surg. 1993 Jan;159(1):49-51
pubmed: 8095807
Br J Surg. 1990 Oct;77(10):1105
pubmed: 2224456
Surg Endosc. 2014 Sep;28(9):2513-30
pubmed: 24718665
Surg Endosc. 2009 Nov;23(11):2459-65
pubmed: 19301071
Dis Colon Rectum. 1987 Nov;30(11):867-71
pubmed: 3677962
J Surg Res. 2011 Mar;166(1):e27-34
pubmed: 21195424
Br J Surg. 2005 Sep;92(9):1150-4
pubmed: 16035134
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Aug;31(8):1409-17
pubmed: 27294661
Colorectal Dis. 2015 Feb;17(2):160-4
pubmed: 25359528
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009 May;24(5):569-76
pubmed: 19221768
Surg Endosc. 2008 Jun;22(6):1452-8
pubmed: 17972132
Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2011 May-Jun;139(5-6):333-8
pubmed: 21858972
Int J Colorectal Dis. 1986 Apr;1(2):96-8
pubmed: 3611941
Colorectal Dis. 2018 Feb;20(2):O39-O45
pubmed: 29172236
Br J Surg. 2010 Dec;97(12):1885-9
pubmed: 20872841
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007 Jun;22(6):689-97
pubmed: 17082922
Br J Surg. 2001 Mar;88(3):400-4
pubmed: 11260107
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 May;31(5):951-960
pubmed: 26833470
Tech Coloproctol. 2018 Jan;22(1):15-23
pubmed: 29230591
Arch Surg. 2009 May;144(5):407-11; discussion 411-2
pubmed: 19451481
Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13
pubmed: 15273542
Br J Surg. 2004 Sep;91(9):1125-30
pubmed: 15449262
J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1990 Apr;35(2):106-8
pubmed: 2355372
Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Mar;58(3):333-8
pubmed: 25664712
Br J Surg. 1990 Oct;77(10):1095-7
pubmed: 2136198
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Feb;31(2):197-210
pubmed: 26507962
Ann Surg. 2015 Aug;262(2):321-30
pubmed: 25361221
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018 Apr;44(4):456-462
pubmed: 29396327
J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Sep;17(9):1698-707
pubmed: 23690209
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 Feb 27;6(2):14-26
pubmed: 24600507
Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 May;56(5):535-50
pubmed: 23575392
Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 May;60(5):527-536
pubmed: 28383453

Auteurs

Marco Ettore Allaix (ME)

Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Corso A. M. Dogliotti, 14, 10126, Turin, Italy. meallaix@gmail.com.

Adriana Lena (A)

Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Corso A. M. Dogliotti, 14, 10126, Turin, Italy.

Maurizio Degiuli (M)

Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Corso A. M. Dogliotti, 14, 10126, Turin, Italy.

Alberto Arezzo (A)

Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Corso A. M. Dogliotti, 14, 10126, Turin, Italy.

Roberto Passera (R)

Division of Nuclear Medicine, University of Torino, Turin, Italy.

Massimiliano Mistrangelo (M)

Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Corso A. M. Dogliotti, 14, 10126, Turin, Italy.

Mario Morino (M)

Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Corso A. M. Dogliotti, 14, 10126, Turin, Italy.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH