Epithelial membrane protein 2: a novel biomarker for circulating tumor cell recovery in breast cancer.
Adult
Aged
Antibodies, Monoclonal
/ immunology
Biomarkers, Tumor
/ blood
Breast Neoplasms
/ blood
Cell Separation
/ methods
Epithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule
/ blood
Female
Humans
Immunomagnetic Separation
/ methods
MCF-7 Cells
Membrane Glycoproteins
/ blood
Middle Aged
Neoplastic Cells, Circulating
/ metabolism
Biomarker
Breast cancer
Capture
Circulating tumor cells
Epithelial membrane protein 2
Journal
Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico
ISSN: 1699-3055
Titre abrégé: Clin Transl Oncol
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101247119
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2019
Apr 2019
Historique:
received:
15
06
2018
accepted:
02
09
2018
pubmed:
16
9
2018
medline:
13
7
2019
entrez:
16
9
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
EpCAM is a common marker used in the detection of circulating tumor cells (CTC). Disseminated cancer cells display the characteristics of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition events. The purpose of this study was to assess the potential of epithelial membrane protein 2 (EMP2) as a novel biomarker for CTC retrieval in breast cancer. MCF7 and MDA-MB-231 cells were stained with either anti-EpCAM or anti-EMP2 mAbs, respectively, followed by flow cytometric assay to measure their expression levels. PBMCs isolated from healthy donors were used for breast cancer cell spiking. CD45-depleted PBMCs from breast cancer patients' blood were used for CTC capturing. Immunomagnetic separation was used to enrich breast cancer cells. Cytospin centrifugation was performed to concentrate the captured cells, followed by immunofluorescence staining with anti-CD45 mAb, anti-pan cytokeratin mAb and DAPI. Fluorescent images were taken using a confocal microscope for CTC counts. MDA-MB-231 cells had 2.56 times higher EMP2 expression than MCF7 cells, and EMP2 had a significantly higher capture efficiency than EpCAM for MCF7 cells. Furthermore, anti-EMP2 was capable of capturing MCF7 cells that escaped in the flow-through of anti-EpCAM. Likewise, EMP2 had a significantly higher capture efficiency on MDA-MB-231 cells when compared to MCF7 cells. Most importantly, EMP2 biomarker was successfully used for CTC capture in patients with primary breast cancer. EMP2 is superior to EpCAM for capturing both MCF7 and MDA-MB-231 cells. Additionally, EMP2 is a novel biomarker and capable of capturing breast cancer cells in patient blood samples.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30218306
doi: 10.1007/s12094-018-1941-1
pii: 10.1007/s12094-018-1941-1
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Monoclonal
0
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
EMP2 protein, human
0
EPCAM protein, human
0
Epithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule
0
Membrane Glycoproteins
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
433-442Références
Lancet. 2000 Dec 9;356(9246):1981-2
pubmed: 11130529
Am J Surg. 2000 Dec;180(6):446-8; discussion 448-9
pubmed: 11182395
Semin Surg Oncol. 2001 Jun;20(4):312-8
pubmed: 11747273
N Engl J Med. 2004 Aug 19;351(8):781-91
pubmed: 15317891
Clin Cancer Res. 2004 Oct 15;10(20):6897-904
pubmed: 15501967
Cell Stem Cell. 2007 Nov;1(5):555-67
pubmed: 18371393
Breast Cancer Res. 2009;11(4):R46
pubmed: 19589136
Cancer Lett. 2010 Feb 1;288(1):99-106
pubmed: 19619935
Anticancer Res. 2009 Oct;29(10):4185-7
pubmed: 19846970
BMC Cancer. 2010 Dec 03;10:666
pubmed: 21129172
BMC Cancer. 2011 Jan 31;11:45
pubmed: 21281469
Breast Cancer Res. 2012 Oct 22;14(5):R133
pubmed: 23088337
J Lab Autom. 2013 Dec;18(6):455-68
pubmed: 23832928
Mol Cancer Ther. 2014 Apr;13(4):902-15
pubmed: 24448822
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014 Mar;15(3):178-96
pubmed: 24556840
Breast Cancer Res. 2014 Mar 06;16(2):R23
pubmed: 24602188
Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 2015 Apr-Jun;119(2):374-8
pubmed: 26204639
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 22;10(12):e0144535
pubmed: 26695635
Mol Oncol. 2016 Mar;10(3):374-94
pubmed: 26897752
Cancer Discov. 2016 May;6(5):479-91
pubmed: 26969689
Oncotarget. 2016 Apr 26;7(17):24677-87
pubmed: 27013581
Cancer Lett. 2016 Jul 1;376(2):205-10
pubmed: 27060205
Mol Clin Oncol. 2016 Apr;4(4):599-602
pubmed: 27073672
Sci Rep. 2016 Jun 23;6:28587
pubmed: 27335258
J Clin Med. 2016 Jul 14;5(7):null
pubmed: 27429011
Int J Mol Sci. 2016 Oct 24;17(10):
pubmed: 27783057
Front Oncol. 2016 Dec 01;6:255
pubmed: 27990412
Oncol Lett. 2016 Dec;12(6):4869-4876
pubmed: 28105194
Oncotarget. 2017 Jan 31;8(5):8801-8806
pubmed: 28187533
Oncogene. 2017 Jun 29;36(26):3706-3717
pubmed: 28192403
Oncogene. 2017 Oct 19;36(42):5793-5807
pubmed: 28604744
Front Med (Lausanne). 2017 Dec 08;4:227
pubmed: 29276709
Oncol Lett. 2018 Feb;15(2):2522-2528
pubmed: 29434968
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Jan 17;92(2):537-41
pubmed: 7831325