LILBID and nESI: Different Native Mass Spectrometry Techniques as Tools in Structural Biology.
Antiporters
/ analysis
Avidin
/ analysis
Bacterial Proteins
/ analysis
Buffers
Detergents
/ chemistry
Escherichia coli Proteins
/ analysis
Glycerol
/ chemistry
Lasers
Mass Spectrometry
/ instrumentation
Membrane Proteins
/ analysis
Potassium Channels
/ analysis
Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization
/ instrumentation
Ion source
LILBID
Membrane proteins
Native mass spectrometry
Soluble proteins
nESI
Journal
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
ISSN: 1879-1123
Titre abrégé: J Am Soc Mass Spectrom
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9010412
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2019
Jan 2019
Historique:
received:
09
03
2018
accepted:
08
08
2018
revised:
02
08
2018
pubmed:
19
9
2018
medline:
19
3
2019
entrez:
19
9
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Native mass spectrometry is applied for the investigation of proteins and protein complexes worldwide. The challenge in native mass spectrometry is maintaining the features of the proteins of interest, such as oligomeric state, bound ligands, or the conformation of the protein complex, during transfer from solution to gas phase. This is an essential prerequisite to allow conclusions about the solution state protein complex, based on the gas phase measurements. Therefore, soft ionization techniques are required. Widely used for the analysis of protein complexes are nanoelectro spray ionization (nESI) mass spectrometers. A newer ionization method is laser induced liquid bead ion desorption (LILBID), which is based on the release of protein complexes from solution phase via infrared (IR) laser desorption. We use both methods in our lab, depending on the requirements of the biological system we are interested in. Here we benchmark the performance of our LILBID mass spectrometer in comparison to a nESI instrument, regarding sample conditions, buffer and additive tolerances, dissociation mechanism and applicability towards soluble and membrane protein complexes. Graphical Abstract ᅟ.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30225732
doi: 10.1007/s13361-018-2061-4
pii: 10.1007/s13361-018-2061-4
pmc: PMC6318263
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antiporters
0
Bacterial Proteins
0
Buffers
0
Detergents
0
Escherichia coli Proteins
0
Membrane Proteins
0
Potassium Channels
0
prokaryotic potassium channel
0
Avidin
1405-69-2
EmrE protein, E coli
147995-06-0
Glycerol
PDC6A3C0OX
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
181-191Subventions
Organisme : European Research Council
ID : 337567
Pays : International
Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
ID : SFB807
Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
ID : SFB807
Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
ID : SFB807
Organisme : Cluster of Excellence Frankfurt
ID : Macromolecular Complexes
Organisme : Cluster of Excellence Frankfurt
ID : Macromolecular Complexes
Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
Anal Chem. 2001 Apr 1;73(7):1455-60
pubmed: 11321294
FEBS Lett. 2002 Aug 14;525(1-3):33-8
pubmed: 12163157
FEBS Lett. 2003 Dec 18;555(3):449-54
pubmed: 14675754
Immunol Lett. 2006 Feb 28;103(1):27-32
pubmed: 16325268
Chem Biol. 2006 Jun;13(6):597-605
pubmed: 16793517
Methods. 2007 Apr;41(4):355-69
pubmed: 16938466
Nat Protoc. 2007;2(3):715-26
pubmed: 17406634
Nat Methods. 2008 Nov;5(11):927-33
pubmed: 18974734
J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2009 Mar;20(3):341-8
pubmed: 19110440
Anal Chem. 2009 Feb 15;81(4):1347-56
pubmed: 19140748
Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2009 Oct;19(5):632-9
pubmed: 19782560
Annu Rev Biochem. 2011;80:247-71
pubmed: 21548785
Science. 2011 Oct 21;334(6054):380-385
pubmed: 22021858
Nature. 2011 Dec 18;481(7379):45-50
pubmed: 22178925
Anal Chem. 2012 Mar 20;84(6):2939-48
pubmed: 22409725
J Mol Biol. 2012 Oct 12;423(1):1-13
pubmed: 22750574
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012 Dec;1818(12):3098-106
pubmed: 22960287
Nat Protoc. 2013 Apr;8(4):639-51
pubmed: 23471109
Nature. 2013 May 23;497(7450):521-4
pubmed: 23676677
Structure. 2013 Sep 3;21(9):1541-50
pubmed: 24010713
Nat Methods. 2013 Dec;10(12):1206-8
pubmed: 24122040
J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 1994 Mar;5(3):201-4
pubmed: 24222550
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2014 Dec;71(24):4895-4910
pubmed: 25012698
J Am Chem Soc. 2014 Dec 10;136(49):17010-2
pubmed: 25402655
Trends Biochem Sci. 2015 Jan;40(1):49-57
pubmed: 25544475
Annu Rev Phys Chem. 2015 Apr;66:453-74
pubmed: 25594852
Anal Chem. 2015 Apr 21;87(8):4370-6
pubmed: 25799115
Methods Enzymol. 2015;556:351-69
pubmed: 25857790
Chem Biol. 2015 May 21;22(5):583-92
pubmed: 25937312
Mass Spectrom Rev. 2016 Jan-Feb;35(1):48-70
pubmed: 25945814
Chem Biol. 2015 May 21;22(5):563-4
pubmed: 26000743
J Phys Chem A. 2016 Mar 10;120(9):1495-500
pubmed: 26903000
Anal Chem. 2016 Jul 19;88(14):7060-7
pubmed: 27328020
J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2017 Jan;28(1):5-13
pubmed: 27909974
Elife. 2017 Jan 09;6:
pubmed: 28067619
Expert Rev Proteomics. 2017 Aug;14(8):715-723
pubmed: 28737967
Methods Mol Biol. 2017;1635:205-232
pubmed: 28755371
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2017 Nov 15;31(21):1845-1850
pubmed: 28850755
Biophys J. 2017 Sep 19;113(6):1177-1178
pubmed: 28867509
Methods. 2018 Sep 1;147:187-205
pubmed: 29510247
Biochemistry. 1997 Aug 19;36(33):10343-52
pubmed: 9254634