The Influence of Spatial Design on Team Communication in Hospital Emergency Departments.


Journal

HERD
ISSN: 2167-5112
Titre abrégé: HERD
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101537529

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 2019
Historique:
pubmed: 22 9 2018
medline: 14 7 2020
entrez: 22 9 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To identify spatial design factors that influence informal interprofessional team-based communication within hospital emergency departments (EDs). Effective team communication in EDs is critical for interprofessional collaborative care and prevention of serious errors due to miscommunication. Limited evidence exists about how informal communication in EDs is shaped by the physical workspace and how workplace design principles can improve the quality of ED team communication. Two health services with four hospital sites in Victoria, Australia, participated. A multistage mixed-methods approach used (1) an anonymous online communication network survey ( N = 103) to collect data on patterns and locations of informal interprofessional team communication among ED staff, (2) focus groups ( N = 37) and interviews ( N = 3) using photoelicitation to understand the perspectives of ED staff about how spatial design influences team communication, and (3) validity testing of preliminary findings with executives and ED managers at the participating sites. Informal communication with peers and within discipline groups on nonspecific areas of the ED was most common. Three key factors influenced the extent to which ED workspaces facilitated informal communication: (1) staff perceptions of privacy, (2) staff perceptions of safety, and (3) staff perceptions of connectedness to ED activity. Our research supports the proposition that ED physical environments influence informal team communication patterns. To facilitate effective team communication, ED workspace spatial designs need to provide visibility and connectedness, support and capture "case talk," enable privacy for "comfort talk," and optimize proximity to patients without compromising safety.

Sections du résumé

OBJECTIVE
To identify spatial design factors that influence informal interprofessional team-based communication within hospital emergency departments (EDs).
BACKGROUND
Effective team communication in EDs is critical for interprofessional collaborative care and prevention of serious errors due to miscommunication. Limited evidence exists about how informal communication in EDs is shaped by the physical workspace and how workplace design principles can improve the quality of ED team communication.
METHOD
Two health services with four hospital sites in Victoria, Australia, participated. A multistage mixed-methods approach used (1) an anonymous online communication network survey ( N = 103) to collect data on patterns and locations of informal interprofessional team communication among ED staff, (2) focus groups ( N = 37) and interviews ( N = 3) using photoelicitation to understand the perspectives of ED staff about how spatial design influences team communication, and (3) validity testing of preliminary findings with executives and ED managers at the participating sites.
RESULTS
Informal communication with peers and within discipline groups on nonspecific areas of the ED was most common. Three key factors influenced the extent to which ED workspaces facilitated informal communication: (1) staff perceptions of privacy, (2) staff perceptions of safety, and (3) staff perceptions of connectedness to ED activity.
CONCLUSION
Our research supports the proposition that ED physical environments influence informal team communication patterns. To facilitate effective team communication, ED workspace spatial designs need to provide visibility and connectedness, support and capture "case talk," enable privacy for "comfort talk," and optimize proximity to patients without compromising safety.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30235953
doi: 10.1177/1937586718800481
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

100-115

Auteurs

Lucio Naccarella (L)

1 Health Systems & Workforce Unit, Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

Michelle Raggatt (M)

2 Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Monash Health Partnership, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.

Bernice Redley (B)

2 Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Monash Health Partnership, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.
3 Faculty of Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH