A high level of satisfaction after bicompartmental individualized knee arthroplasty with patient-specific implants and instruments.
Adult
Aged
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
/ instrumentation
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Knee
/ surgery
Knee Joint
/ surgery
Knee Prosthesis
Male
Middle Aged
Observer Variation
Osteoarthritis, Knee
/ psychology
Patient Satisfaction
Postoperative Period
Printing, Three-Dimensional
Prostheses and Implants
Prosthesis Design
Tibia
/ surgery
Treatment Outcome
Bicompartmental knee arthroplasty; osteoarthritis
Customized individually made
Patient-specific implantation
Resurfacing
Journal
Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA
ISSN: 1433-7347
Titre abrégé: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9314730
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2019
May 2019
Historique:
received:
16
03
2018
accepted:
19
09
2018
pubmed:
7
10
2018
medline:
20
8
2019
entrez:
7
10
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Customized Individually Made (CIM) Bicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (BKA) implants and three-dimensional printed customized instruments are available to fit to each patient's unique anatomy, medial or lateral with patellofemoral. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes after CIM-BKA. Fifty-five patients [59 knees; average age, 51 years; standard deviation (SD), 6.8; range 37-65 years] who underwent CIM-BKA were evaluated over an average of 3.8-year follow-up (SD 1.6; range 1-6 years). Forty-one knees underwent BKA combined medial and patellofemoral replacement (BKA-MP) and 18 knees underwent BKA combined lateral with patellofemoral replacement (BKA-LP). Survival rates, the modified Cincinnati Knee Rating Scale, WOMAC, VAS, SF-36, a satisfaction survey, and radiographic evaluation were used to evaluate outcomes. Overall, survival rates were 98% and 92% at 2 and 5 years, respectively. Of 56 knees (95%) that did not fail, all patient-reported functional scores significantly improved post-operatively (P < 0.01), regardless of the previous surgeries, with a high level of satisfaction (51/56 knees, 91%). Radiographically, all the femoral components fit perfectly and 56 knees (95%) of the tibial components fit with less than 2 mm of undercoverage or overhang. Three knees (5%) required the conversion to TKA and 17 knees (29%) required subsequent surgical procedures, of which multiply operated knees had higher rate than virgin knee [14/40 (35%) vs. 3/16 (19%)]. CIM-BKA allowed precise fit of the components and provided a significant improvement post-operatively with a high level of satisfaction over short- to mid-term follow-up. This novel CIM-BKA is resurfacing, and does not require 10-mm faceted cuts, being only 3-mm-thick, which preserves bone stock for the future. It may be a promising option for relatively young active patients with bicompartmental osteoarthritis with a longer term follow-up being necessary. IV.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30291399
doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5155-4
pii: 10.1007/s00167-018-5155-4
pmc: PMC6527787
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1487-1496Références
Clin J Sport Med. 2001 Oct;11(4):223-8
pubmed: 11753058
BMJ. 1992 Jul 18;305(6846):160-4
pubmed: 1285753
Ann Rheum Dis. 1957 Dec;16(4):485-93
pubmed: 13498603
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Jul;(436):237-45
pubmed: 15995447
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Nov;466(11):2711-6
pubmed: 18719972
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009 Apr;17(4):328-33
pubmed: 19099293
Knee. 2009 Oct;16(5):310-3
pubmed: 19188069
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 May;92(5):1115-21
pubmed: 20439656
Clin Geriatr Med. 2010 Aug;26(3):387-99
pubmed: 20699161
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011 Jan 27;12:29
pubmed: 21272328
Br J Sports Med. 2012 Mar;46(3):180-92
pubmed: 21511738
J Arthroplasty. 2011 Sep;26(6 Suppl):40-5
pubmed: 21550763
J Psychosom Res. 2011 Nov;71(5):296-9
pubmed: 21999972
J Arthroplasty. 2013 Feb;28(2):227-33
pubmed: 22749658
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Dec;21(12):2737-43
pubmed: 22829329
Knee. 2014 Jan;21(1):180-4
pubmed: 24148793
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Apr 2;96(7):529-35
pubmed: 24695918
Int Orthop. 2015 Aug;39(8):1519-26
pubmed: 25645437
Knee. 2015 Sep;22(4):321-7
pubmed: 25956739
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015 Sep;101(5):547-52
pubmed: 26047754
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989 Sep;(246):238-49
pubmed: 2670388
J Arthroplasty. 2016 May;31(5):1016-21
pubmed: 26725134
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2016 Jul;26(5):517-21
pubmed: 27001223
Bone Joint J. 2016 Dec;98-B(12):1625-1634
pubmed: 27909124
Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2017 Feb;29(1):51-58
pubmed: 28144716
Orthop Clin North Am. 2017 Jul;48(3):265-273
pubmed: 28577776
Int Orthop. 2018 Aug;42(8):1827-1833
pubmed: 29030653
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Mar;33(3):677-683
pubmed: 29113757
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Jun;26(6):1811-1822
pubmed: 29185005
J Rheumatol. 1988 Dec;15(12):1833-40
pubmed: 3068365