Model-assisted process characterization and validation for a continuous two-column protein A capture process.


Journal

Biotechnology and bioengineering
ISSN: 1097-0290
Titre abrégé: Biotechnol Bioeng
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7502021

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 2019
Historique:
received: 14 08 2018
revised: 03 10 2018
accepted: 05 10 2018
pubmed: 10 10 2018
medline: 18 12 2019
entrez: 10 10 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In this study we introduce three process characterization approaches toward validation of continuous twin-column capture chromatography (CaptureSMB), referred to as "standard," "model assisted," and "hybrid." They are all based on a traditional risk-based approach, using process description, risk analysis, design-of-experiments (DoE), and statistical analysis as essential elements. The first approach, the "standard" approach uses a traditional experimental DoE to explore the design space of the high-ranked process parameters for the continuous process. Due to the larger number of process parameters in the continuous process, the DoE is extensive and includes a larger number of experiments than an equivalent DoE of a single column batch capture process. In the investigated case, many of the operating conditions were practically infeasible, indicating that the design space boundaries had been chosen inappropriately. To reduce experimental burden and at the same time enhance process understanding, an alternative "model assisted" approach was developed in parallel, employing a chromatographic process model to substitute experimental runs by computer simulations. Using the "model assisted" approach only experimental conditions that were feasible in terms of process yield constraints (>90%) were considered for statistical analysis. The "model assisted" approach included an optimization part that identified potential boundaries of the design space automatically. In summary, the "model assisted" approach contributed to increased process understanding compared to the "standard" approach. In this study, a "hybrid" approach was also used containing the general concepts of the "standard" approach but substituting a number of its experiments by computer simulations. The presented approaches contain essential elements of the Food and Drug Administration's process validation guideline.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30298905
doi: 10.1002/bit.26849
doi:

Substances chimiques

Biological Products 0
Staphylococcal Protein A 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

87-98

Informations de copyright

© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Auteurs

Daniel Baur (D)

Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.

James Angelo (J)

Biologics Process Development, Global Product Development and Supply, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Inc, Devens, Massachusetts.

Srinivas Chollangi (S)

Biologics Process Development, Global Product Development and Supply, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Inc, Devens, Massachusetts.

Thomas Müller-Späth (T)

ChromaCon AG, Zurich, Switzerland.

Xuankuo Xu (X)

Biologics Process Development, Global Product Development and Supply, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Inc, Devens, Massachusetts.

Sanchayita Ghose (S)

Biologics Process Development, Global Product Development and Supply, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Inc, Devens, Massachusetts.

Zheng Jian Li (ZJ)

Biologics Process Development, Global Product Development and Supply, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Inc, Devens, Massachusetts.

Massimo Morbidelli (M)

Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.

Articles similaires

Humans Meta-Analysis as Topic Sample Size Models, Statistical Computer Simulation
Humans Algorithms Software Artificial Intelligence Computer Simulation
Humans Robotic Surgical Procedures Clinical Competence Male Female

A computational model for bacteriophage ϕX174 gene expression.

Alexis M Hill, Tanvi A Ingle, Claus O Wilke
1.00
Gene Expression Regulation, Viral Promoter Regions, Genetic Bacteriophage phi X 174 Computer Simulation Models, Genetic

Classifications MeSH