Prognostic value of estimated plasma volume in acute heart failure in three cohort studies.
Acute Disease
Aged
Biomarkers
/ blood
Cause of Death
/ trends
Europe
/ epidemiology
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Heart Failure
/ blood
Humans
Japan
/ epidemiology
Male
Plasma Volume
/ physiology
Prognosis
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
/ methods
Survival Rate
/ trends
Ventricular Function, Left
/ physiology
Acute decompensated heart failure
Congestion
Plasma volume
Prognosis
Journal
Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society
ISSN: 1861-0692
Titre abrégé: Clin Res Cardiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101264123
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2019
05 2019
Historique:
received:
20
07
2018
accepted:
15
10
2018
pubmed:
21
10
2018
medline:
29
8
2019
entrez:
21
10
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Estimated plasma volume status (ePVS) predicts prognosis in patients with heart failure (HF). It remains unclear whether admission, discharge or change ePVS best predicts post-discharge outcome in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). We retrospectively analyzed three cohort studies: 383 patients admitted at the Tokyo Medical University hospital, 165 patients admitted at the Centro Hospitalar do Porto and 164 patients admitted at the Nancy University Hospital (ICALOR study). ePVS at admission and at discharge as well as its change thereof were, respectively, calculated using the Duarte and Strauss formulas, both derived from hemoglobin and hematocrit ratios. Clinical variables including physical assessment, biological and echocardiographic parameters were recorded. The clinical outcome was a composite of re-hospitalization for worsening HF or all-cause mortality [corrected]. The primary outcomes occurred in 27.2% at 1 year (in the Tokyo cohort), 45.3% at 6 months (in the Porto cohort) and 53.9% at median terms of 298.3 days (in the ICALOR study). After adjusting for potential confounders including natriuretic peptide, discharge ePVS remained significantly associated with increased rates of composite outcome in the Tokyo and Porto cohorts and ICALOR study [hazard ratio (HR) 1.21 (1.01-1.44), p = 0.04; HR 1.45 (1.16-1.81), p < 0.01; HR 1.45 (1.16-1.81), p < 0.01, respectively]. In addition, a pooled analysis yielded a significant improvement in reclassification with discharge ePVS [net reclassification index 13.6% (5.9-22.7), p = 0.004]. As validated in three independent ADHF cohorts, ePVS at discharge was independently associated with post-discharge clinical outcomes and improved the risk stratification of patients admitted for ADHF on top of well-established prognostic markers.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30341579
doi: 10.1007/s00392-018-1385-1
pii: 10.1007/s00392-018-1385-1
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
549-561Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 May 14;61(19):1973-81
pubmed: 23500313
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 May 16;69(19):2428-2445
pubmed: 28494980
Eur J Heart Fail. 2010 May;12(5):423-33
pubmed: 20354029
Echocardiography. 2015 Feb;32(2):213-20
pubmed: 24813438
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Jul 1;120(1):98-105
pubmed: 28479167
Eur J Heart Fail. 2016 Aug;18(8):891-975
pubmed: 27207191
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 Jun 19;39(12):1901-8
pubmed: 12084586
Eur J Heart Fail. 2013 Dec;15(12):1401-11
pubmed: 23845795
Heart Fail Rev. 2011 Nov;16(6):519-29
pubmed: 21604179
Eur Heart J. 2013 Mar;34(11):835-43
pubmed: 23293303
Eur J Heart Fail. 2015 Jan;17(1):35-43
pubmed: 25469484
J Card Fail. 2017 Aug;23(8):628-651
pubmed: 28461259
Br J Haematol. 1973 Dec;25(6):801-14
pubmed: 4586522
Clin Res Cardiol. 2016 Dec;105(12):971-980
pubmed: 27314418
Clin Res Cardiol. 2018 Jul;107(7):586-596
pubmed: 29532155
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Nov 1;58(19):1958-66
pubmed: 22032706
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Aug 6;62(6):516-24
pubmed: 23747773
Circulation. 2010 Jul 20;122(3):265-72
pubmed: 20606118
J Clin Med Res. 2016 Oct;8(10):737-42
pubmed: 27635179
Ann Intern Med. 1999 Mar 16;130(6):461-70
pubmed: 10075613
Clin Res Cardiol. 2016 Jun;105(6):489-507
pubmed: 26615605
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Apr;95(14):e3307
pubmed: 27057905
Eur J Heart Fail. 2015 Oct;17(10):1022-31
pubmed: 25960401
Am J Cardiol. 2008 Sep 15;102(6):722-5
pubmed: 18773996
Eur Heart J. 2011 Mar;32(6):670-9
pubmed: 21138935
Eur J Heart Fail. 2015 Nov;17(11):1172-81
pubmed: 26417699
J Clin Invest. 1951 Aug;30(8):862-8
pubmed: 14861307
Eur J Heart Fail. 2016 Aug;18(8):1041-50
pubmed: 27114058
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2018 Jun;7(4):330-338
pubmed: 28139135
Circ Heart Fail. 2011 Sep;4(5):628-36
pubmed: 21743005
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2017 Jun;6(4):339-347
pubmed: 27073131
JACC Heart Fail. 2015 Nov;3(11):886-93
pubmed: 26541787
Lancet. 2003 Mar 29;361(9363):1077-83
pubmed: 12672310
Clin Res Cardiol. 2018 Dec;107(12):1103-1110
pubmed: 29785543
J Card Fail. 2018 Sep;24(9):553-560
pubmed: 30098381
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Oct 9;168(4):3652-8
pubmed: 23809709
Clin Res Cardiol. 2017 May;106(5):359-368
pubmed: 27999929