Combined epithelial marker analysis of tumour budding in stage II colorectal cancer.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antigens, CD
/ metabolism
Biomarkers, Tumor
/ analysis
Cadherins
/ metabolism
Colorectal Neoplasms
/ diagnosis
Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition
/ physiology
Female
Humans
Integrin beta4
/ metabolism
Keratins
/ metabolism
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Staging
/ methods
Prognosis
Tissue Array Analysis
/ methods
colorectal cancer
digital pathology
epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition
integrin β4
multiplex immunohistochemistry
prognostics
tumour budding
Journal
The journal of pathology. Clinical research
ISSN: 2056-4538
Titre abrégé: J Pathol Clin Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101658534
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2019
01 2019
Historique:
received:
21
05
2018
revised:
03
10
2018
accepted:
20
10
2018
pubmed:
26
10
2018
medline:
23
7
2020
entrez:
26
10
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Tumour budding predicts survival of stage II colorectal cancer (CRC) and has been suggested to be associated with epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). However, the underlying molecular changes of tumour budding remain poorly understood. Here, we performed multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC) to phenotypically profile tumours using known EMT-associated markers: E-cadherin (adherence junctions), integrin β4 (ITGB4; basement membrane), ZO-1 (tight junctions), and pan-cytokeratin. A subpopulation of patients showed high ITGB4 expression in tumour buds, and this coincided with a switch of ITGB4 localisation from the basal membrane of intact epithelium to the cytoplasm of budding cells. Digital image analysis demonstrated that tumour budding with high ITGB4 expression in tissue microarray (TMA) cores correlated with tumour budding assessed from haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) whole sections and independently predicted poor disease-specific survival in two independent stage II CRC cohorts (hazard ratio [HR] = 4.50 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.50-13.5), n = 232; HR = 3.52 (95% CI = 1.30-9.53), n = 72). Furthermore, digitally obtained ITGB4-high bud count in random TMA cores was better associated with survival outcome than visual tumour bud count in corresponding H&E-stained samples. In summary, the mIHC-based phenotypic profiling of human tumour tissue shows strong potential for the molecular characterisation of tumour biology and for the discovery of novel prognostic biomarkers.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30358171
doi: 10.1002/cjp2.119
pmc: PMC6317060
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antigens, CD
0
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
CDH1 protein, human
0
Cadherins
0
ITGB4 protein, human
0
Integrin beta4
0
Keratins
68238-35-7
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
63-78Informations de copyright
© 2018 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research published by The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
J Invest Dermatol. 1999 Apr;112(4):411-8
pubmed: 10201522
Am J Pathol. 2000 Mar;156(3):985-96
pubmed: 10702414
Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2001 Oct;13(5):541-5
pubmed: 11544021
Cancer Res. 2001 Nov 15;61(22):8089-93
pubmed: 11719433
J Clin Pathol. 2003 Jan;56(1):69-73
pubmed: 12499439
Lab Invest. 2005 Feb;85(2):257-66
pubmed: 15516972
Gut. 1992 Mar;33(3):342-6
pubmed: 1568652
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Aug 17;97(16):1180-4
pubmed: 16106022
Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2005 Sep;24(3):413-23
pubmed: 16258729
Genome Biol. 2006;7(10):R100
pubmed: 17076895
J Pathol. 2007 Jul;212(3):260-8
pubmed: 17516584
Hum Pathol. 2007 Nov;38(11):1696-702
pubmed: 17707462
Anticancer Res. 2008 May-Jun;28(3B):1831-6
pubmed: 18630467
Am J Surg Pathol. 2009 Jan;33(1):134-41
pubmed: 18971777
Cancer. 2010 Nov 15;116(22):5336-9
pubmed: 20665503
Oncotarget. 2010 Nov;1(7):651-61
pubmed: 21317460
Int J Oncol. 1994 Sep;5(3):573-8
pubmed: 21559615
Cancer Biol Ther. 2012 Mar;13(5):289-95
pubmed: 22310977
Mod Pathol. 2012 Oct;25(10):1315-25
pubmed: 22790014
Histopathology. 2012 Nov;61(5):777-87
pubmed: 22803799
J Transl Med. 2013 Apr 30;11:104
pubmed: 23627766
Cancer Res. 1988 Feb 15;48(4):816-21
pubmed: 2448027
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014 Mar;15(3):178-96
pubmed: 24556840
Cancer Sci. 2014 Nov;105(11):1487-95
pubmed: 25220207
Lab Invest. 2015 Mar;95(3):308-19
pubmed: 25599535
Virchows Arch. 2015 May;466(5):485-93
pubmed: 25701480
Lab Invest. 2015 Sep;95(9):976-86
pubmed: 26121317
Hum Pathol. 2016 Jan;47(1):4-19
pubmed: 26476568
J Biol Chem. 1989 Apr 15;264(11):6529-35
pubmed: 2649503
Pathol Int. 2016 Feb;66(2):75-82
pubmed: 26753834
J Clin Med. 2016 Apr 29;5(5):null
pubmed: 27136592
Cancer Res. 1989 May 15;49(10):2615-20
pubmed: 2713845
J Korean Med Sci. 2017 Jan;32(1):38-46
pubmed: 27914130
Hum Pathol. 2017 Jul;65:21-30
pubmed: 28188750
Mod Pathol. 2017 Sep;30(9):1299-1311
pubmed: 28548122
J Pathol Clin Res. 2017 Jul 26;3(3):171-178
pubmed: 28770101
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 27;12(9):e0185436
pubmed: 28953975
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 14;7(1):15580
pubmed: 29138507
Oncotarget. 2017 Sep 27;8(54):92333-92345
pubmed: 29190919
Int J Cancer. 2019 Jan 1;144(1):150-159
pubmed: 29992570
J Clin Invest. 1993 Sep;92(3):1425-35
pubmed: 8376596
J Pathol. 1998 May;185(1):44-52
pubmed: 9713359