Continuous dynamic mapping to avoid accidental injury of the facial nerve during surgery for large vestibular schwannomas.
Adult
Aged
Cohort Studies
Facial Nerve Injuries
/ etiology
Facial Paralysis
/ etiology
Female
Humans
Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring
/ methods
Male
Middle Aged
Neuroma, Acoustic
/ surgery
Neurosurgical Procedures
/ adverse effects
Postoperative Complications
/ etiology
Quality of Life
Reproducibility of Results
Retrospective Studies
Electrical nerve stimulation
Facial nerve
House-Brackmann score
Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring
Motor evoked potential
Vestibular schwannoma
Journal
Neurosurgical review
ISSN: 1437-2320
Titre abrégé: Neurosurg Rev
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 7908181
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2020
Feb 2020
Historique:
received:
30
07
2018
accepted:
16
10
2018
revised:
23
09
2018
pubmed:
28
10
2018
medline:
15
9
2020
entrez:
28
10
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In vestibular schwannoma (VS) surgery postoperative facial nerve (CN VII) palsy is reducing quality of life. Recently, we have introduced a surgical suction device for continuous dynamic mapping to provide feedback during tumor resection without switching to a separate stimulation probe. The objective was to evaluate the reliability of this method to avoid CN VII injury. Continuous mapping for CN VII was performed in large VS (08/2014 to 11/2017) additionally to standard neurophysiological techniques. A surgical suction-and-mapping probe was used for surgical dissection and continuous monopolar stimulation. Stimulation was performed with 0.05-2 mA intensities (0.3 msec pulse duration, 2.0 Hz). Postoperative CNVII outcome was assessed by the House-Brackmann-Score (HBS) after 1 week and 3 months following surgery. Twenty patients with Koos III (n = 2; 10%) and Koos IV (n = 18; 90%) VS were included. Preoperative HBS was 1 in 19 patients and 2 in 1 patient. Dynamic mapping reliably indicated the facial nerve when resection was close to 5-10 mm. One week after surgery, 7 patients presented with worsening in HBS. At 3 months, 4 patients' facial weakness had resolved and 3 patients (15%) had an impairment of CN VII (HBS 3 and 4). Of the 3 patients, near-total removal was attempted in 2. The continuous dynamic mapping method using an electrified surgical suction device might be a valuable additional tool in surgery of large VS. It provides real-time feedback indicating the presence of the facial nerve within 5-10 mm depending on stimulation intensity and may help in avoiding accidental injury to the nerve.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30367353
doi: 10.1007/s10143-018-1044-z
pii: 10.1007/s10143-018-1044-z
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
241-248Références
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2006 Apr;46(4):176-80; discussion 180-1
pubmed: 16636507
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1992 Apr;25(2):413-48
pubmed: 1630836
Neurosurg Focus. 2012 Sep;33(3):E16
pubmed: 22937850
J Neurosurg. 2007 Mar;106(3):519-20; author reply 520
pubmed: 17367086
Neurophysiol Clin. 2007 Dec;37(6):399-406
pubmed: 18083495
Neurosurgery. 2010 Jun;66(6):1064-73; discussion 1073
pubmed: 20386137
Neurosurgery. 2018 Feb 1;82(2):202-210
pubmed: 28383680
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2011 May;153(5):1059-67; discussion 1067
pubmed: 21340712
Clin Neurophysiol. 2015 Sep;126(9):1833-9
pubmed: 25655939
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Jun;66(2):191-5
pubmed: 24822161
J Neurosurg. 2013 Feb;118(2):287-96
pubmed: 23198802
J Clin Neurol. 2016 Jul;12(3):262-73
pubmed: 27449909
Laryngoscope. 1985 Dec;95(12):1536-40
pubmed: 4068872
Childs Nerv Syst. 2002 Jul;18(6-7):264-87
pubmed: 12172930
J Neurosurg. 2000 Oct;93(4):586-93
pubmed: 11014536
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2011 Sep;153(9):1753-9
pubmed: 21660421
Clin Neurophysiol. 2014 Feb;125(2):415-21
pubmed: 23993682
Neurosurgery. 1989 Feb;24(2):300-1
pubmed: 2918989
World Neurosurg. 2015 Aug;84(2):292-300
pubmed: 25790872
Clin Neurophysiol. 2015 Sep;126(9):1647-9
pubmed: 25680949
Neurosurg Focus. 2018 Mar;44(3):E4
pubmed: 29490553
J Neurosurg. 2015 Aug;123(2):301-6
pubmed: 25978712
J Neurosurg. 2010 Apr;112(4):860-7
pubmed: 19663543
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008 Apr;79(4):431-6
pubmed: 17673492
J Neurosurg. 2014 Jun;120(6):1278-87
pubmed: 24724851
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2013 Dec;155(12):2273-9; discussion 2279
pubmed: 24078065
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2017 Jul;159(7):1197-1211
pubmed: 28516364
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2011 Dec;113(10):872-9
pubmed: 21798660
J Neurosurg. 2014 May;120(5):1015-24
pubmed: 24628613
Skull Base Surg. 1991;1(2):85-92
pubmed: 17170827
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004 Jan;130(1):104-12
pubmed: 14726918
World Neurosurg. 2017 May;101:357-364
pubmed: 28213194
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2013 Feb;74(1):39-43
pubmed: 24436886
Neurosurg Rev. 2014 Jan;37(1):15-21
pubmed: 23771647
Clin Neurophysiol. 2005 Mar;116(3):588-96
pubmed: 15721072
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Aug;27(2):161-168
pubmed: 28524753
Childs Nerv Syst. 2010 Apr;26(4):513-21
pubmed: 20143075
Neurosurg Focus. 2012 Sep;33(3):E5
pubmed: 22937856
Neurochirurgie. 2017 Jun;63(3):175-180
pubmed: 28506487
Neurosurgery. 2012 Sep;71(1 Suppl Operative):104-14; discussion 114-5
pubmed: 22270233
Clin Neurophysiol. 2013 Dec;124(12):2291-316
pubmed: 24055297