Work Disability in Australia: An Overview of Prevalence, Expenditure, Support Systems and Services.


Journal

Journal of occupational rehabilitation
ISSN: 1573-3688
Titre abrégé: J Occup Rehabil
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9202814

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 2019
Historique:
pubmed: 31 10 2018
medline: 20 8 2020
entrez: 31 10 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Purpose This study sought to describe Australian systems of income support for people with work disability. Specific aims were to summarise and compare the features of the income support systems, including the rehabilitation and employment services funded or provided by those systems, and factors affecting transition between systems. Further objectives were to estimate the prevalence of work disability in Australia and the national expenditure on work disability income support. Methods A mixed methods project involving collation and analysis of existing publicly available documentation and data, and interviews with 25 experts across ten major systems of income support. The prevalence of work disability and expenditure in each system, and in total, was estimated using publicly accessible data sources. System features and service models were synthesised from data sources, tabulated and compared qualitatively. Results In Australia during the 2015/2016 financial year an estimated 786,000 people with work disability received income support from a Commonwealth, state, territory or private source. An additional 6.5 million people accessed employer provided leave entitlements for short periods of work incapacity. A total of $37.2 billion Australian dollars was spent on income support for these people during the year. This support was provided through a complex array of government authorities, private sector insurers and employers. Service models vary substantially between systems, with case management the only service provided across all systems. Healthcare and return to work services were provided in some systems, although models differed markedly between systems. Income support ranged from 19 to 100% of earnings for a person earning the average weekly Australian wage pre-disability. There is a paucity of information relating to movement between systems of support, however it is likely that many thousands of people with long periods of work disability transition between systems annually. Conclusions This study demonstrates the substantial financial and human impact of work disability on Australian society. Findings indicate multiple opportunities for reducing the burden of work disability, including aligning case management and healthcare service models, and engaging employers in prevention and rehabilitation. The findings suggest a need for greater interrogation and evaluation of Australian work disability support systems.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30374851
doi: 10.1007/s10926-018-9816-4
pii: 10.1007/s10926-018-9816-4
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

526-539

Références

Soc Secur Bull. 2003-2004;65(4):31-7
pubmed: 16402660
Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2010 Sep;17(3):145-59
pubmed: 19946813
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35614
pubmed: 22558176
Am J Ind Med. 2012 Nov;55(11):1028-36
pubmed: 22968927
Soc Secur Bull. 2012;72(3):1-17
pubmed: 23113426
JAMA Psychiatry. 2014 Apr;71(4):446-53
pubmed: 24522841
J Occup Rehabil. 2015 Mar;25(1):160-81
pubmed: 24832892
J Occup Rehabil. 2015 Mar;25(1):220-39
pubmed: 24871375
Public Health. 2014 Jul;128(7):587-618
pubmed: 25065515
Soc Sci Med. 2015 May;132:88-94
pubmed: 25795992
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jul 11;15:642
pubmed: 26162910
BMC Fam Pract. 2015 Aug 15;16:100
pubmed: 26275607
BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 20;6(1):e009423
pubmed: 26792215
BMJ Open. 2016 May 05;6(5):e010910
pubmed: 27150186
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jul 29;16:658
pubmed: 27473747
Lancet. 2016 Oct 8;388(10053):1545-1602
pubmed: 27733282
J Occup Rehabil. 2018 Mar;28(1):1-15
pubmed: 28224415
Health Policy. 2017 Aug;121(8):903-912
pubmed: 28595897
Scand J Public Health. 2019 Mar;47(2):127-136
pubmed: 29032743
Public Health Res Pract. 2017 Oct 11;27(4):null
pubmed: 29114712
Health Econ. 2018 Mar;27(3):606-621
pubmed: 29237234
BMC Public Health. 2018 Jan 5;18(1):100
pubmed: 29301515
Lancet. 2018 Jun 9;391(10137):2356-2367
pubmed: 29573870

Auteurs

Alex Collie (A)

School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia. alex.collie@monash.edu.

Michael Di Donato (M)

School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.

Ross Iles (R)

School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH