A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing the Short- and Long-Term Outcomes for Laparoscopic and Open Liver Resections for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Updated Results from the European Guidelines Meeting on Laparoscopic Liver Surgery, Southampton, UK, 2017.


Journal

Annals of surgical oncology
ISSN: 1534-4681
Titre abrégé: Ann Surg Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9420840

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2019
Historique:
received: 29 04 2018
pubmed: 6 11 2018
medline: 21 5 2019
entrez: 4 11 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The laparoscopic approach to liver resection has experienced exponential growth in recent years; however, its application is still under debate and objective, evidence-based guidelines for its safe future progression are needed. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic and open liver resections for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). To identify all the comparative manuscripts reporting on laparoscopic and open liver resection for HCC, all published English-language studies with more than 10 cases were screened. In addition to the primary meta-analysis, four specific subgroup analyses were performed on patients with Child-Pugh A cirrhosis, resections for solitary tumors, and those undergoing minor and major resections. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) methodology and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. From the initial 361 manuscripts, 28 were included in the meta-analysis. Five of these 28 manuscripts were specific to patients with Child-Pugh A cirrhosis (321 cases), 11 focused on solitary tumors (1003 cases), 16 focused on minor resections (1286 cases), and 3 focused on major resections (164 cases). Three manuscripts compared 1079 cases but could not be assigned to any of the above subanalyses. In general terms, short-term outcomes were favorable when using a laparoscopic approach, especially in minor resections. The only advantage seen with an open approach was reduced operative time during major liver resections. No differences in long-term outcomes were observed between the approaches. Laparoscopic liver resection for HCC is feasible and offers improved short-term outcomes, with comparable long-term outcomes as the open approach.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The laparoscopic approach to liver resection has experienced exponential growth in recent years; however, its application is still under debate and objective, evidence-based guidelines for its safe future progression are needed.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic and open liver resections for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
METHODS METHODS
To identify all the comparative manuscripts reporting on laparoscopic and open liver resection for HCC, all published English-language studies with more than 10 cases were screened. In addition to the primary meta-analysis, four specific subgroup analyses were performed on patients with Child-Pugh A cirrhosis, resections for solitary tumors, and those undergoing minor and major resections. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) methodology and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.
RESULTS RESULTS
From the initial 361 manuscripts, 28 were included in the meta-analysis. Five of these 28 manuscripts were specific to patients with Child-Pugh A cirrhosis (321 cases), 11 focused on solitary tumors (1003 cases), 16 focused on minor resections (1286 cases), and 3 focused on major resections (164 cases). Three manuscripts compared 1079 cases but could not be assigned to any of the above subanalyses. In general terms, short-term outcomes were favorable when using a laparoscopic approach, especially in minor resections. The only advantage seen with an open approach was reduced operative time during major liver resections. No differences in long-term outcomes were observed between the approaches.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Laparoscopic liver resection for HCC is feasible and offers improved short-term outcomes, with comparable long-term outcomes as the open approach.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30390167
doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6926-3
pii: 10.1245/s10434-018-6926-3
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

252-263

Auteurs

Ruben Ciria (R)

Unit of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, CIBER-EHD, IMIBIC, University Hospital Reina Sofía, University of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain. rubenciria@gmail.com.

Irene Gomez-Luque (I)

Unit of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, CIBER-EHD, IMIBIC, University Hospital Reina Sofía, University of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain.

Sira Ocaña (S)

Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University Clinic, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.

Federica Cipriani (F)

Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.

Mark Halls (M)

Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.

Javier Briceño (J)

Unit of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, CIBER-EHD, IMIBIC, University Hospital Reina Sofía, University of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain.

Yukihiro Okuda (Y)

Unit of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, CIBER-EHD, IMIBIC, University Hospital Reina Sofía, University of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain.
Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

Roberto Troisi (R)

Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, "Federico II" University, Naples, Italy.

Fernando Rotellar (F)

Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University Clinic, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.

Olivier Soubrane (O)

Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplant, Beaujon Hospital, University Paris 7, Clichy, AP-HP, France.

Mohammed Abu Hilal (M)

Department of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK. abuhilal9@gmail.com.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH