Asexual reproduction and growth rate: independent and plastic life history traits in Neurospora crassa.
Journal
The ISME journal
ISSN: 1751-7370
Titre abrégé: ISME J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101301086
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2019
03 2019
Historique:
received:
25
04
2018
accepted:
19
09
2018
revised:
07
09
2018
pubmed:
11
11
2018
medline:
7
8
2019
entrez:
11
11
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Trade-offs among traits influencing fitness are predicted by life history theory because resources allocated to one function are unavailable to another. Here we examine the relationship between two such traits, asexual reproduction and growth rate, in the filamentous fungus Neurospora crassa, where shared genetic and physiological factors and a source-sink energetic relationship between growth and reproduction may constrain the evolution of these traits. To test growth-reproduction relationships in this species, we independently selected on mycelial growth rate or asexual spore production in a heterogeneous lab-derived population and evaluated the response of the non-selected traits. Combined with phenotypes for the 20 wild strains used to produce the heterogeneous population and the genome-wide genotypes of 468 strains, these data show that growth and reproduction are highly plastic in N. crassa and do not trade off either among wild strains or after laboratory selection in two environments. Rather, we find no predictable growth-reproduction relationship in the environments tested, indicating an effective absence of genetic constraint between these traits. Our results suggest that growth rate and asexual reproduction may not respond predictably to environmental change and suggest that reliance on a single trait as a proxy for fitness in fungal studies may be inadvisable.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30413765
doi: 10.1038/s41396-018-0294-7
pii: 10.1038/s41396-018-0294-7
pmc: PMC6462030
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Pagination
780-788Références
Trends Microbiol. 2002 Oct;10(10):474-81
pubmed: 12377558
New Phytol. 2002 Sep;155(3):321-348
pubmed: 33873312
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2017 Feb;1389(1):76-91
pubmed: 27936291
G3 (Bethesda). 2016 Dec 7;6(12):4009-4022
pubmed: 27694114
Genetics. 1966 Jun;53(6):1151-65
pubmed: 5958913
Genetics. 1995 Sep;141(1):137-45
pubmed: 8536962
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014 Aug 19;369(1649):20130245
pubmed: 25002693
Mol Ecol. 2013 Jun;22(11):3124-40
pubmed: 23701397
Eukaryot Cell. 2008 Sep;7(9):1549-64
pubmed: 18676954
J Theor Biol. 2013 Mar 7;320:124-30
pubmed: 23246716
Trends Ecol Evol. 2000 Oct 1;15(10):421-425
pubmed: 10998520
Mycologia. 2002 Jan-Feb;94(1):40-8
pubmed: 21156476
Heredity (Edinb). 2004 Sep;93(3):241-8
pubmed: 15280897
J Biosci. 2010 Mar;35(1):119-26
pubmed: 20413916
Trends Ecol Evol. 2012 Oct;27(10):547-60
pubmed: 22819306
Genetics. 2011 Aug;188(4):799-808
pubmed: 21828280
Mol Ecol. 2015 May;24(9):1969-86
pubmed: 25469955
Evolution. 1997 Oct;51(5):1499-1505
pubmed: 28568630
Evolution. 2006 May;60(5):970-9
pubmed: 16817537
Nat Rev Genet. 2009 Aug;10(8):531-9
pubmed: 19546856
Nucleic Acids Res. 2012 Jan;40(Database issue):D675-81
pubmed: 22064857
PLoS One. 2007 Aug 29;2(8):e795
pubmed: 17726525
Bull Math Biol. 2007 Feb;69(2):605-34
pubmed: 16841267
Am Nat. 2016 Feb;187(2):E27-40
pubmed: 26807754
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2011 Dec;66(12):1300-8
pubmed: 21975091
PLoS One. 2008;3(10):e3376
pubmed: 18852878
Int J Biometeorol. 2015 Sep;59(9):1157-67
pubmed: 25414142
PLoS One. 2011 Apr 13;6(4):e18561
pubmed: 21541009
Mol Ecol. 2011 Oct;20(19):4042-58
pubmed: 21902746
Trends Ecol Evol. 2004 Oct;19(10):535-44
pubmed: 16701319
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Feb 15;108(7):2831-6
pubmed: 21282627
New Phytol. 2013 Sep;199(4):895-907
pubmed: 23782262
Nature. 2003 Apr 24;422(6934):859-68
pubmed: 12712197