Multi-parametric "on board" evaluation of right ventricular function using three-dimensional echocardiography: feasibility and comparison to traditional two-and three dimensional echocardiographic measurements.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Case-Control Studies
Echocardiography, Doppler
Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional
Feasibility Studies
Female
Heart Diseases
/ diagnostic imaging
Heart Ventricles
/ diagnostic imaging
Humans
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Middle Aged
Myocardial Contraction
Predictive Value of Tests
Prospective Studies
Reproducibility of Results
Software
Stroke Volume
Ventricular Function, Right
Right ventricle
Right ventricular ejection fraction
Right ventricular strain
Three-dimensional echocardiography
Journal
The international journal of cardiovascular imaging
ISSN: 1875-8312
Titre abrégé: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100969716
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2019
Feb 2019
Historique:
received:
10
09
2018
accepted:
02
11
2018
pubmed:
16
11
2018
medline:
23
4
2019
entrez:
16
11
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Three-dimensional echocardiographic (3DE) of right ventricle (RV) has been validated in many clinical settings. However, the necessity of complicated and off-line dedicated software has reduced its diffusion. A new simplified "on board" 3DE software (OB) has been developed to obtain RV volumes and ejection fraction (EF) together with several conventional parameters automatically derived from 3DE: tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), fractional area change (FAC), longitudinal strain (LS). Aims of this study were to evaluate feasibility and accuracy of OB RV analysis. A complete 2DE and 3DE with OB 3DRV evaluation was obtained in 35 normal subjects and 105 patients with different pathologies. Results were compared with the conventional off-line software (OFL) and with the 2D-derived corresponding values. A subgroup of 22 patients underwent also cardiac CMR. OB 3DRV was feasible in 133/140 cases (95%) in a mean time of 97.5 ± 33 s lower than OFL analysis (129 ± 52 s plus dataset loading 80 ± 24 s). Imaging quality was good in 84%. OB and OFL 3DE RV volumes and EF were similar. 3DE derived FSA and LS (but not TAPSE) were similar to 2DE values and correlated with tissue Doppler systolic peak velocity, dP/dt, systolic pulmonary pressure and myocardial performance index. OB RV volumes and EF well correlated with CMR. (bias + SD: - 21.5 ± 20 mL for EDV; - 8.2 ± 12.4 mL for ESV; - 1 ± 5.9% for EF). OB 3DE method is feasible, simple, time saving. It easily provides 3DE RV volumes and multiple functional parameters. Off-line operator border adjustment may improve accuracy of 3DE TAPSE.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30430329
doi: 10.1007/s10554-018-1496-9
pii: 10.1007/s10554-018-1496-9
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
275-284Références
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2004 May;17(5):443-7
pubmed: 15122184
Am J Cardiol. 2006 Mar 1;97(5):703-9
pubmed: 16490442
Int J Cardiol. 2007 Jan 31;115(1):86-9
pubmed: 16750277
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Oct 23;50(17):1668-76
pubmed: 17950149
Am J Cardiol. 2008 Aug 15;102(4):499-505
pubmed: 18678314
Eur J Echocardiogr. 2009 Jul;10(5):630-4
pubmed: 19252190
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010 Jan;3(1):10-8
pubmed: 20129525
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010 Feb;23(2):109-15
pubmed: 20152691
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010 Feb;23(2):116-26
pubmed: 20152692
Curr Opin Cardiol. 2010 Sep;25(5):430-6
pubmed: 20592586
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010 Jul;23(7):685-713; quiz 786-8
pubmed: 20620859
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010 Sep;23(9):943-53
pubmed: 20797527
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011 Mar;24(3):277-313
pubmed: 21338865
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011 Aug;24(8):868-77
pubmed: 21665432
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013 Apr;32(4):424-30
pubmed: 23498163
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Sep;6(5):700-10
pubmed: 23811752
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Jun;7(6):553-60
pubmed: 24412192
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Mar;7(2):230-9
pubmed: 24515411
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2014 Aug;27(8):858-871.e1
pubmed: 24975996
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015 Jan;28(1):1-39.e14
pubmed: 25559473
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Jun;8(6):null
pubmed: 26038432
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015 Oct;28(10):1222-31
pubmed: 26237996
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Nov;17(11):1279-1289
pubmed: 26647080
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Feb;18(2):212-223
pubmed: 26873461
Circulation. 2016 Aug 30;134(9):656-65
pubmed: 27507405
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Feb;10(2):
pubmed: 28174197