Patients at low surgical risk as defined by the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Score undergoing isolated interventional or surgical aortic valve implantation: in-hospital data and 1-year results from the German Aortic Valve Registry (GARY).
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aortic Valve Stenosis
/ surgery
Case-Control Studies
Comorbidity
Female
Germany
/ epidemiology
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation
/ adverse effects
Hospital Mortality
/ trends
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Registries
Risk Assessment
Severity of Illness Index
Societies, Medical
/ organization & administration
Survival Rate
Thoracic Surgery
/ statistics & numerical data
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
/ adverse effects
Low risk
Surgical aortic valve replacement
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation
Journal
European heart journal
ISSN: 1522-9645
Titre abrégé: Eur Heart J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8006263
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 05 2019
01 05 2019
Historique:
accepted:
09
10
2018
pubmed:
18
11
2018
medline:
8
9
2020
entrez:
17
11
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become the standard treatment for patients with severe aortic valve stenosis at high surgical risk and may be considered for patients with intermediate risk. During the last few years, an increasing number of patients with low surgical risk have been treated with TAVI. In this study, low-risk patients undergoing isolated TAVI or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) were analysed using data from the German Aortic Valve Registry (GARY). All patients with a Society of Thoracic Surgeons Score of <4% undergoing TAVI or SAVR in 2014 and 2015 were evaluated. A total of 20 549 low surgical risk patients remained for further analysis, comprising 14 487 surgical patients and 6062 TAVI patients. Since TAVI patients were significantly older and had significantly more co-morbidities, a weighted propensity score model was used to compare SAVR and TAVI patients for in-hospital, 30-day, and 1-year mortality. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation patients showed a significantly higher in-hospital and 30-day survival than SAVR patients (in hospital survival TAVI vs. SAVR: 98.5% vs. 97.3%; P = 0.003; 30-day survival TAVI vs. SAVR: 98.1% vs. 97.1%; P = 0.014). At 1 year, survival rates did not differ significantly (survival TAVI vs. SAVR: 90.0% vs. 91.2%; P = 0.158). In this first GARY analysis of low-risk patients, weighted comparison showed similar 1-year survival for TAVI and SAVR and higher in-hospital survival for TAVI patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30445543
pii: 5185128
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy699
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1323-1330Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2018. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.