Right colectomy: consecutive 100 patients treated with laparoscopic and robotic technique for malignancy. Cumulative experience in a single centre.
Colorectal cancer
Intracorporeal anastomosis
Laparoscopy
Learning curve
Right colectomy
Robotic surgery
Journal
Updates in surgery
ISSN: 2038-3312
Titre abrégé: Updates Surg
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101539818
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2019
Mar 2019
Historique:
received:
12
01
2018
accepted:
08
10
2018
pubmed:
19
11
2018
medline:
30
7
2019
entrez:
19
11
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Robotic-assisted resections prove beneficial in overcoming potential limitation of laparoscopy, but clear evidences on patient's benefits are still lacking. We report our experience on 100 consecutive patients who underwent right colectomy with either robotic or laparoscopic approaches. Data were prospectively collected on a dedicated database (ASA score, age, operative time, conversion rate, re-operation rate, early complications, length of stay, and pathological results). Median total operative time was 160 min in LS group (IQR = 140-180) and 204 min for RS group (IQR = 180-230). Median time to first flatus was 2.5 days for LS group (IQR = 2 - 3) and 2 days for RS group (IQR = 1-2). Length of stay (median) was 8 days in LS group (IQR = 6-10) and 5 days in RS group (IQR = 5-7). No statistically significant difference was found between the 2 groups when the number of harvested nodes, the anastomotic leakage and the postoperative bleeding were analyzed. The 30-day mortality was 0% in LS and RS groups. Conversion rate for LS group was 14% (7/50 pts) and for RS group was 0% (0/50). Minimally invasive surgery is a feasible and safe technique. The RS may overcome some technical limitations of laparoscopic surgery and it achieves the same oncological results compared to LS but with higher costs. The lower conversion rate allows to expect better clinical outcomes and lower complication rate.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30448923
doi: 10.1007/s13304-018-0599-0
pii: 10.1007/s13304-018-0599-0
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
151-156Références
Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Nov;17(11):2856-62
pubmed: 20567918
Surg Endosc. 2003 Apr;17(4):636-40
pubmed: 12574925
N Engl J Med. 2004 May 13;350(20):2050-9
pubmed: 15141043
Ann Surg. 1999 Apr;229(4):487-92
pubmed: 10203080
Lancet. 2002 Jun 29;359(9325):2224-9
pubmed: 12103285
JSLS. 2014 Oct-Dec;18(4):
pubmed: 25587213
Updates Surg. 2016 Mar;68(1):63-9
pubmed: 26992927
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2004 Dec;14(6):329-34
pubmed: 15684776
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Jul 20;25(21):3061-8
pubmed: 17634484
Colorectal Dis. 2009 May;11(4):354-64; discussion 364-5
pubmed: 19016817
Surg Endosc. 2018 Mar;32(3):1104-1110
pubmed: 29218671
Dis Colon Rectum. 2001 May;44(5):638-46
pubmed: 11357021
Surg Endosc. 2008 Jul;22(7):1601-8
pubmed: 18270772
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Aug;223(2):369-73
pubmed: 27109780
Am J Surg. 2004 Jan;187(1):88-92
pubmed: 14706593
Arch Surg. 2003 Jul;138(7):777-84
pubmed: 12860761
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Dec;23(Suppl 5):684-691
pubmed: 27699611
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2002 Apr;12(2):88-95
pubmed: 11948293
JSLS. 2007 Jan-Mar;11(1):76-80
pubmed: 17651561
Surg Endosc. 2015 Jun;29(6):1512-21
pubmed: 25303905
JAMA. 2002 Jan 16;287(3):321-8
pubmed: 11790211
Int J Surg. 2015 Jun;18:75-82
pubmed: 25907328
Surg Endosc. 2016 Oct;30(10):4624-5
pubmed: 26902612
Surg Endosc. 2002 Oct;16(10):1389-402
pubmed: 12140630
Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13
pubmed: 15273542
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2005 May;20(3):253-7
pubmed: 15614504
World J Gastroenterol. 2003 Dec;9(12):2690-4
pubmed: 14669314
Surg Clin North Am. 2003 Dec;83(6):1463-8, xi
pubmed: 14712879
Dis Colon Rectum. 2002 Dec;45(12):1689-94; discussion 1695-6
pubmed: 12473897
World J Surg. 2001 Nov;25(11):1467-77
pubmed: 11760751