Radiological Evaluation Does Not Reflect the Clinical Outcome After Surgery in Unstable Thoracolumbar and Lumbar Type A Fractures Without Neurological Symptoms: A Comparative Study of 2 Cohorts Treated by Open or Percutaneous Surgery.


Journal

Clinical spine surgery
ISSN: 2380-0194
Titre abrégé: Clin Spine Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101675083

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 2019
Historique:
pubmed: 20 11 2018
medline: 10 4 2020
entrez: 20 11 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

This is a prospective study of 2 cohorts. Compare the clinical and radiologic outcome of 2 cohorts of unstable thoracolumbar and lumbar fractures treated by open posterior fixation (OPF) with bone graft or by percutaneous fixation (PCF) without grafting. In recent years, PCF is the most common treatment of thoracolumbar fractures. To date, no studies have analyzed clinical outcomes in terms of return to work. Two cohorts of patients with unstable thoracolumbar and lumbar fractures fractures (type A2, A3, and A4) without neurological symptoms underwent OPF (n=91) or PCF (n=54) between 2010 and 2015. A conventional radiologic study was performed in the preoperative, immediate postoperative period, 1-year, and 2-year follow-up. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by Visual Analog Scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores at 1-year and 2-year follow-up. The period to return to work and the type of work were also recorded. The percentages of correction were significantly higher in cases operated by OPF: fracture angle (P<0.001), kyphotic deformity (P<0.001), vertebral compression (P<0.001), and displacement (P<0.001). Cases operated by PCF experienced greater loss of correction at 2-year follow-up, especially in fracture displacement (P<0.001), deformity angle (P<0.001), kyphotic deformity (P<0.001), and in the sagittal index (P<0.001). Besides this greater loss of correction, PCF cases showed better Visual Analog Scale (P<0.001) and Oswestry Disability Index scores (P<0.001) at final follow-up. The percentage of patients returning to the same heavy work position was higher in the PCF group (P<0.001) and in a shorter period of time (P<0.001). The greater loss of correction of patients undergoing PCF does not reflect the clinical outcomes that were significantly better as compared to patients undergoing open fixation with grafting. It would be useful to further evaluate if the radiological changes could have a long-term clinical significance.

Sections du résumé

STUDY DESIGN
This is a prospective study of 2 cohorts.
OBJECTIVE
Compare the clinical and radiologic outcome of 2 cohorts of unstable thoracolumbar and lumbar fractures treated by open posterior fixation (OPF) with bone graft or by percutaneous fixation (PCF) without grafting.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA
In recent years, PCF is the most common treatment of thoracolumbar fractures. To date, no studies have analyzed clinical outcomes in terms of return to work.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Two cohorts of patients with unstable thoracolumbar and lumbar fractures fractures (type A2, A3, and A4) without neurological symptoms underwent OPF (n=91) or PCF (n=54) between 2010 and 2015. A conventional radiologic study was performed in the preoperative, immediate postoperative period, 1-year, and 2-year follow-up. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by Visual Analog Scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores at 1-year and 2-year follow-up. The period to return to work and the type of work were also recorded.
RESULTS
The percentages of correction were significantly higher in cases operated by OPF: fracture angle (P<0.001), kyphotic deformity (P<0.001), vertebral compression (P<0.001), and displacement (P<0.001). Cases operated by PCF experienced greater loss of correction at 2-year follow-up, especially in fracture displacement (P<0.001), deformity angle (P<0.001), kyphotic deformity (P<0.001), and in the sagittal index (P<0.001). Besides this greater loss of correction, PCF cases showed better Visual Analog Scale (P<0.001) and Oswestry Disability Index scores (P<0.001) at final follow-up. The percentage of patients returning to the same heavy work position was higher in the PCF group (P<0.001) and in a shorter period of time (P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
The greater loss of correction of patients undergoing PCF does not reflect the clinical outcomes that were significantly better as compared to patients undergoing open fixation with grafting. It would be useful to further evaluate if the radiological changes could have a long-term clinical significance.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30451782
doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000737
doi:

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

E117-E125

Auteurs

Rafael Lorente (R)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Hospital Infanta Cristina, Badajoz.

Alejandro Lorente (A)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital Ramón y Cajal.

Pablo Palacios (P)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Hospital Madrid Sanchinarro, Madrid.

Carlos Barrios (C)

Institute for Research on Musculoskeletal Disorders, School of Medicine, Valencia Catholic University, Valencia, Spain.

Bárbara Rosa (B)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Hospital Vila Franca de Xira, Vila Franca de Xira, Portugal.

Alexander Vaccaro (A)

Department of Spine Surgery of Sidney Kimmel Medical Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH