Barriers to and Facilitators of Implementing Programs for Return to Work (RTW) of Cancer Survivors in Four European Countries: A Qualitative Study.
Focus groups
Implementation
Intervention
Neoplasms
Return to work
Journal
Journal of occupational rehabilitation
ISSN: 1573-3688
Titre abrégé: J Occup Rehabil
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9202814
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2019
09 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
24
11
2018
medline:
20
8
2020
entrez:
24
11
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Purpose Implementation of return to work (RTW) programs for cancer survivors has proved to be challenging. The purpose of our study was to gather experiences about barriers to and facilitators of implementing RTW programs for cancer survivors in four European countries. Methods Separate multidisciplinary focus groups were held in Belgium (n = 8), the Netherlands (n = 8), Ireland (n = 6), and UK (n = 4) in 2017 and included among others a physician, and a representative of an employer, a cancer society, and the government. Primary focus of thematic analysis was what could be done to improve the implementation of RTW programs for cancer survivors. Analysis used the 'Arena in work disability prevention model' as the conceptual framework. Results Many barriers to and facilitators of implementing RTW programs for cancer survivors were described including the personal, workplace, healthcare and legislative system as well as the overall societal and political context. That is, for example cooperation between stakeholders, time, money and ability issues at the workplace, and insufficient/inadequate legislation. Insufficient knowledge of cancer and its implications for work was identified as an overarching theme in all countries leading to stigma, misconceptions and lack of communication. This was mentioned in relation to the workplace, personal and healthcare system, and in the overall societal context. Conclusions Results indicate that a prerequisite for implementing RTW programs is raising sufficient knowledge regarding cancer and its implications for work. Greater knowledge could be a first step to better implement RTW programs which may result in better supporting cancer survivors with their RTW .
Identifiants
pubmed: 30467648
doi: 10.1007/s10926-018-9818-2
pii: 10.1007/s10926-018-9818-2
pmc: PMC6675765
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
550-559Références
Intensive Care Med. 2004 Apr;30(4):536-55
pubmed: 14997291
J Occup Rehabil. 2005 Dec;15(4):507-24
pubmed: 16254752
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57
pubmed: 17872937
Qual Health Res. 2007 Oct;17(8):1103-16
pubmed: 17928482
J Cancer Surviv. 2007 Jun;1(2):129-36
pubmed: 18648953
JAMA. 2009 Feb 18;301(7):753-62
pubmed: 19224752
Implement Sci. 2009 Aug 07;4:50
pubmed: 19664226
J Cancer Surviv. 2010 Dec;4(4):415-37
pubmed: 20945110
J Occup Rehabil. 2011 Mar;21 Suppl 1:S77-85
pubmed: 21365301
J Occup Rehabil. 2012 Jun;22(2):241-51
pubmed: 22105670
J Occup Rehabil. 2012 Dec;22(4):565-78
pubmed: 22699884
Haematologica. 2013 Mar;98(3):479-86
pubmed: 22929981
BMC Public Health. 2013 Feb 19;13:153
pubmed: 23421974
Eur J Cancer. 2013 Apr;49(6):1374-403
pubmed: 23485231
BMC Public Health. 2013 Aug 13;13:750
pubmed: 23941563
Occup Med (Lond). 2013 Oct;63(7):501-6
pubmed: 24027219
Work. 2013;46(4):455-72
pubmed: 24125901
Psychooncology. 2014 May;23(5):481-92
pubmed: 24375630
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Feb 1;191(3):292-301
pubmed: 25369558
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 25;(9):CD007569
pubmed: 26405010
BMC Public Health. 2016 Sep 06;15:940
pubmed: 27600542
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016 Oct;52(4):560-569.e1
pubmed: 27650011
J Occup Rehabil. 2017 Sep;27(3):422-433
pubmed: 27699618
J Occup Rehabil. 2016 Dec;26(4):448-464
pubmed: 27796914
Am J Occup Ther. 2017 May/Jun;71(3):7103090010P1-7103090010P7
pubmed: 28422624
Support Care Cancer. 2017 Nov;25(11):3495-3504
pubmed: 28612159
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2018 Mar;27(2):e12793
pubmed: 29205611