Impact of androgen deprivation therapy on apparent diffusion coefficient and T2w MRI for histogram and texture analysis with respect to focal radiotherapy of prostate cancer.
Einfluss der Androgendeprivation auf Diffusionskoeffizient und T2-gewichtete MRT zur Histogramm- und Texturanalyse im Hinblick auf fokale Strahlentherapie beim Prostatakarzinom.
ADC
Boost volume
Quantitative imaging
Radiomics
Tissue characterization
Journal
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]
ISSN: 1439-099X
Titre abrégé: Strahlenther Onkol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8603469
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2019
May 2019
Historique:
received:
10
07
2018
accepted:
12
11
2018
pubmed:
28
11
2018
medline:
22
1
2020
entrez:
28
11
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Accurate prostate cancer (PCa) detection is essential for planning focal external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). While biparametric MRI (bpMRI) including T2-weighted (T2w) and diffusion-weighted images (DWI) is an accurate tool to localize PCa, its value is less clear in the case of additional androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). The aim of this study was to investigate the value of a textural feature (TF) approach on bpMRI analysis in prostate cancer patients with and without neoadjuvant ADT with respect to future dose-painting applications. 28 PCa patients (54-80 years) with (n = 14) and without (n = 14) ADT who underwent bpMRI with T2w and DWI were analyzed retrospectively. Lesions, central gland (CG), and peripheral zone (PZ) were delineated by an experienced urogenital radiologist based on localized pre-therapeutic histopathology. Histogram parameters and 20 Haralick TF were calculated. Regional differences (i. e., tumor vs. PZ, tumor vs. CG) were analyzed for all imaging parameters. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to measure diagnostic performance to distinguish PCa from benign prostate tissue and to identify the features with best discriminative power in both patient groups. The obtained sensitivities were equivalent or superior when utilizing the TF in the no-ADT group, while specificity was higher for the histogram parameters. However, in the ADT group, TF outperformed the conventional histogram parameters in both specificity and sensitivity. Rule-in and rule-out criteria for ADT patients could exclusively be defined with the aid of TF. The TF approach has the potential for quantitative image-assisted boost volume delineation in PCa patients even if they are undergoing neoadjuvant ADT.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30478670
doi: 10.1007/s00066-018-1402-3
pii: 10.1007/s00066-018-1402-3
pmc: PMC6488548
doi:
Substances chimiques
Androgen Antagonists
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
402-411Références
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018 Jul;45(7):1170-1178
pubmed: 29468311
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2002 Feb;21(2):139-49
pubmed: 11929101
Strahlenther Onkol. 2017 Oct;193(10):767-779
pubmed: 28687979
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2016 May;32(5):
pubmed: 26313267
Prostate. 1987;10(1):11-7
pubmed: 3103113
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Dec;36(6):1402-12
pubmed: 22851455
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 22;14(2):e0212110
pubmed: 30794577
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Dec;48(6):1626-1636
pubmed: 29734484
Eur Radiol. 2015 Sep;25(9):2665-72
pubmed: 25820537
Radiother Oncol. 2012 May;103(2):233-8
pubmed: 22265733
Trials. 2011 Dec 05;12:255
pubmed: 22141598
Strahlenther Onkol. 2018 Jul;194(7):638-645
pubmed: 29511777
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Dec;203(6):W645-50
pubmed: 25415730
Radiology. 2012 Jun;263(3):856-64
pubmed: 22474671
Phys Med Biol. 2017 Sep 21;62(19):7833-7854
pubmed: 28837046
Strahlenther Onkol. 2015 Nov;191(11):862-8
pubmed: 26168782
Phys Med Biol. 2017 Jul 24;62(16):6497-6514
pubmed: 28582269
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Nov 15;96(4):778-784
pubmed: 27788950
BJU Int. 2016 Jul;118(1):7
pubmed: 27311545
Eur Urol Focus. 2016 Aug;2(3):276-283
pubmed: 27766313
Magn Reson Med. 2012 Mar;67(3):778-85
pubmed: 22135228
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 Jan;45(1):103-117
pubmed: 27345946
Eur Radiol. 2012 Apr;22(4):746-57
pubmed: 22322308
Comput Biol Med. 2015 May;60:8-31
pubmed: 25747341
Radiology. 2017 Nov;285(2):493-505
pubmed: 28727544
Strahlenther Onkol. 2015 Apr;191(4):330-7
pubmed: 25471276
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010 Jun;29(6):1310-20
pubmed: 20378467
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2013;2013:6478-81
pubmed: 24111225
Strahlenther Onkol. 2013 Sep;189(9):789-95
pubmed: 23797481
Strahlenther Onkol. 2001 Feb;177(2):90-5
pubmed: 11233840
Radiother Oncol. 2018 Apr;127(1):74-80
pubmed: 29336835
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Feb 22;:
pubmed: 29469937
Cancer. 2014 Jun 1;120(11):1620-9
pubmed: 24591080
Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 22;7(1):4041
pubmed: 28642480
Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2011 Oct-Dec;35(7-8):568-78
pubmed: 21255974
Radiother Oncol. 2015 Dec;117(3):509-14
pubmed: 26349588
Radiographics. 2010 Jan;30(1):13-22
pubmed: 19901087
Nat Rev Urol. 2016 Nov;13(11):641-653
pubmed: 27670618